It’s already patented. Been since the 1980s. Flying black triangles and pill shaped drones using electric fields to create some sort of gravity field that doesn’t have friction. It can go between air and water seamlessly, that’s why all the navy pilots say they saw it go in the water. The drawings and patent numbers are available, redacted into the dirt of course. But they exist and belong to the Navy.
It’s obvious they are real, and they are our own equipment. In this video of supposed unidentified triangle drones flying around a navy warship, they have visual the IR markers for IFF. Those aren’t ufos, they are drones. It’s a slow drip. All this bullshit about ufos harassing navy ships is bullshit. They are clearly marked with IR strobes.
We are already exploring our local area as much as possible for planets that are composed in a way that’s friendly to life, and our space exploration is less than a century old. What about a civilization a thousand years ahead? Or 100k years ahead? Or 3 million?
If we take it for granted that life exists out there based on the sheer probabilities, on a timeline measured in billions of years, it isn’t a stretch to imagine some alien science drone crashed into earth. We can see distant planets propensity for life using current satellites, why wouldn’t other civilizations have the same tech or far more? How many objects have we crashed into nearby planets in our own solar system for research purposes? How many more will we in the next 50k years?
We only been doing this space shit for 50-60 years and look at what we have done. What about a civilization who has been doing it for 50k?
This is the point lost on normies when it comes to space and the possibility of alien civilizations. What we have done in the 100 or so years since we first took to the air is incredible. What we will have accomplished 1000 years from now we cant even imagine. And 50k years from now? Incomprehensible.
Or that we (humanity) already had advanced technology and through manmade or natural disasters had to “reboot”. But what if some part of the advanced humanity managed to save their tech and civilization? Wouldn’t they be considered “gods” or “aliens” to those with lesser technology.
Aliens are certainly real and we've possibly already made contact or at the very least have interacted in some way with them or their tech. That doesn't make my original statement incorrect. If your only evidence is "there are patents!" then I have several different models of time machines to sell you.
This is video of them clearly being tested around a naval vessel “leaked” from the Pentagon where they claim to just have no idea what these objects could be. And yet they have IR strobes commonly used in the military for IFF.
Your analogy to time machines is laughable. Are the patent holders for the time machines government agencies? Are these same agencies now claiming that ancient Roman warriors are mysteriously showing up around their bases? If they were, your analogy would work. But they aren’t.
The same people who owns patents on triangular untraditional propulsion unmanned vehicles are suddenly suffering from swarming drones with friendly IR strobes that look exactly like the patent drawing. Just like time machines. Lol.
I have patent numbers, too. Only one I know of that ever turned into military technology, and it was not alien science. Unless you are the inventor, you don't really know anything about it, so stop using it as a magic wand.
Makes for a great TV series. But this is all fantasy. There is no evidence and no technology. You can believe in you gut all you want to, but your gut has no I.Q.
I have already provided one piece of evidence of the navy destroyer video. Here is the second piece, https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060145019A1/en
A patent for a triangular spacecraft from the US navy.
So instead of relying on broad sweeping dismissal of my evidence based on nothing but your gut feeling that you are right, why don’t you refute my evidence? Are you suggesting both of these items are fantasy? That you have a high iQ?
Let me give you a tip. Next time you should say this is fantasy because.... Or you are wrong because..... and then you actually say something useful and productive to prove my assertion is not correct.
You sound like a vaxxer. CNN hasn’t told you the navy most likely is testing alien propulsion for next gen drones, so you just ignore video of the fucking thing and the godamn patent for it, and refer to these things as fantasy, even though you can see them with your own eyes.
Evidence of what? Imagination? Drones fly around with multiple small rotors. No anti-gravity involved or necessary.
Let me give you a tip. Work in the industry for 40 years and soak up some understanding. You are the one trying to prove something that is literally incredible, so your proofs ought to be verifiable. Waving a video proves nothing---as all my Moon Hoax friends (ha!) would be glad to agree.
I don't watch CNN and they don't send me any memos. As for the invention, it looks like it takes some inspiration from the Biefeld-Brown effect, and by the stressed field work that has been studied by NASA (failure) and by the Russians (success). Reminds me of the de Seversky ionocraft, but they did not scale up beyond tabletop demonstrators.
Lol ok. Your incredible genius didn’t even notice the drones in the navy video don’t make noise. Those aren’t standard drones powered by blades. I didn’t leak them. I didn’t make the claim that they are unidentified. I didn’t create the claim they were silent and hovered around the ship for hours. The Pentagon did.
You should take this old smart guy shtick to the pentagon and explain to them clearly those are nothing more than DJI drones with some construction paper on them.
I swear dunning kruger just pours off of you in sheets.
It’s already patented. Been since the 1980s. Flying black triangles and pill shaped drones using electric fields to create some sort of gravity field that doesn’t have friction. It can go between air and water seamlessly, that’s why all the navy pilots say they saw it go in the water. The drawings and patent numbers are available, redacted into the dirt of course. But they exist and belong to the Navy.
Patented doesn't equal real.
It’s obvious they are real, and they are our own equipment. In this video of supposed unidentified triangle drones flying around a navy warship, they have visual the IR markers for IFF. Those aren’t ufos, they are drones. It’s a slow drip. All this bullshit about ufos harassing navy ships is bullshit. They are clearly marked with IR strobes.
We are already exploring our local area as much as possible for planets that are composed in a way that’s friendly to life, and our space exploration is less than a century old. What about a civilization a thousand years ahead? Or 100k years ahead? Or 3 million?
If we take it for granted that life exists out there based on the sheer probabilities, on a timeline measured in billions of years, it isn’t a stretch to imagine some alien science drone crashed into earth. We can see distant planets propensity for life using current satellites, why wouldn’t other civilizations have the same tech or far more? How many objects have we crashed into nearby planets in our own solar system for research purposes? How many more will we in the next 50k years?
We only been doing this space shit for 50-60 years and look at what we have done. What about a civilization who has been doing it for 50k?
This is the point lost on normies when it comes to space and the possibility of alien civilizations. What we have done in the 100 or so years since we first took to the air is incredible. What we will have accomplished 1000 years from now we cant even imagine. And 50k years from now? Incomprehensible.
Or that we (humanity) already had advanced technology and through manmade or natural disasters had to “reboot”. But what if some part of the advanced humanity managed to save their tech and civilization? Wouldn’t they be considered “gods” or “aliens” to those with lesser technology.
Aliens are certainly real and we've possibly already made contact or at the very least have interacted in some way with them or their tech. That doesn't make my original statement incorrect. If your only evidence is "there are patents!" then I have several different models of time machines to sell you.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SKsLK_Na7iw
This is video of them clearly being tested around a naval vessel “leaked” from the Pentagon where they claim to just have no idea what these objects could be. And yet they have IR strobes commonly used in the military for IFF.
Your analogy to time machines is laughable. Are the patent holders for the time machines government agencies? Are these same agencies now claiming that ancient Roman warriors are mysteriously showing up around their bases? If they were, your analogy would work. But they aren’t.
The same people who owns patents on triangular untraditional propulsion unmanned vehicles are suddenly suffering from swarming drones with friendly IR strobes that look exactly like the patent drawing. Just like time machines. Lol.
I have patent numbers, too. Only one I know of that ever turned into military technology, and it was not alien science. Unless you are the inventor, you don't really know anything about it, so stop using it as a magic wand.
Makes for a great TV series. But this is all fantasy. There is no evidence and no technology. You can believe in you gut all you want to, but your gut has no I.Q.
Is that the best you got to play the smart guy?
I have already provided one piece of evidence of the navy destroyer video. Here is the second piece, https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060145019A1/en A patent for a triangular spacecraft from the US navy.
So instead of relying on broad sweeping dismissal of my evidence based on nothing but your gut feeling that you are right, why don’t you refute my evidence? Are you suggesting both of these items are fantasy? That you have a high iQ?
Let me give you a tip. Next time you should say this is fantasy because.... Or you are wrong because..... and then you actually say something useful and productive to prove my assertion is not correct.
You sound like a vaxxer. CNN hasn’t told you the navy most likely is testing alien propulsion for next gen drones, so you just ignore video of the fucking thing and the godamn patent for it, and refer to these things as fantasy, even though you can see them with your own eyes.
dunning-kruger
Evidence of what? Imagination? Drones fly around with multiple small rotors. No anti-gravity involved or necessary.
Let me give you a tip. Work in the industry for 40 years and soak up some understanding. You are the one trying to prove something that is literally incredible, so your proofs ought to be verifiable. Waving a video proves nothing---as all my Moon Hoax friends (ha!) would be glad to agree.
I don't watch CNN and they don't send me any memos. As for the invention, it looks like it takes some inspiration from the Biefeld-Brown effect, and by the stressed field work that has been studied by NASA (failure) and by the Russians (success). Reminds me of the de Seversky ionocraft, but they did not scale up beyond tabletop demonstrators.
Lol ok. Your incredible genius didn’t even notice the drones in the navy video don’t make noise. Those aren’t standard drones powered by blades. I didn’t leak them. I didn’t make the claim that they are unidentified. I didn’t create the claim they were silent and hovered around the ship for hours. The Pentagon did.
You should take this old smart guy shtick to the pentagon and explain to them clearly those are nothing more than DJI drones with some construction paper on them.
I swear dunning kruger just pours off of you in sheets.
there are literally patents for this shit already. just like covid and its vaccine were patented years ago.
Lmao man are you gonna have your reality shattered.