Some people are getting upset when I ask them for real evidence that Betty White was some type of evil witch.
I don’t worship Betty White despite the fact that she was a nice old lady and a comic genius.
I’m trying to defend this community from disinformation.
Disinformation is often comes in the form of a planted discrediting campaign. A good example of that is the flat earth campaign. Somebody spent a lot of money trying to create the idea that ALL conspiracy theorists believe that the earth is flat.
If Left-wing media organizations can plant the false narrative that all of us here at dot.win believe that “Betty White is the Satanic queen of Hollywood” most people are not going to believe it, because there’s no legitimate evidence for that.
Once they’ve created the narrative that all Trump followers are delusional then the Normie’s can ignore every single legitimate piece of evidence that we present to them. It’s called poisoning the well. Once you pour just a little bit of poison into the well of dot.win then no one is going to drink anymore water from this site.
Normie thinking: “Those people believe that Betty White is a Satanist therefore when they tell me that Joe Biden is a serial sex abuser, I don’t have to pay attention to that at all.”
I thought that Betty White was an amusing comic actress. I don’t worship her. You can go through my posting history before last week and I never ever mentioned her. And there is also nothing suspicious about her that’s ever been posted about her here until after she died.
So I want you to dig really hard and give me the legitimate, legally valid evidence that Betty White was the satanic queen of Hollywood. If you don’t have any legitimate evidence shut the f-ck up.
P.S. Black eyes, off-color jokes and resemblances between old ladies are not valid legitimate, legal forms of evidence.
If you make a claim and can't bring the receipts, you're just stating an opinion. Which is fine for idea sharing, but if you are trying to convince someone of something, bring the proof.
With this, however I agree that it's not necessary. It changes nothing one way or the other. At this point until the Q team releases something, it's all speculation. We can only go on what we know and as OP said she was mostly a sweet old lady and comic genius. I hope she's clean, but hope is not evidence. As far as we know she is "dead" but at the same time her "death" could all have been part of the plan. Dead at 99, 17 days before the big 100 of "natural causes". Again, I have no pull one way or the other on this one.
"...But hope is not evidence."
I wish more people understood that.
And if you have no evidence, the default is the assumption of innocence. It is a sick perversion to go around with the idea that even the dead are supposed to prove their innocence, when only "suspicion" exists (more properly labeled paranoia).
Its like our own form of cancel culture. Label them a pedo and disregard any idea to the contrary.
No the cover-up is that Betty was likely was killed by a Covid vaccine booster.
But no one’s talking about that because are too busy speculating on how she may have been a satanic queen.
Cannot both be true, doth one exclude t'other?
There can be more than one right answer. But to disagree with the speculation does NOT make you right. No one is making you click on posts and I know this will be hard to hear, but... this isn't YOUR site. It's a community site. You are more than welcome to go start your own dot win community and tailor it to your liking.
There’s a difference between some speculation and putting up a post where someone claims that “they are 100% sure that Betty White was the sister of Barbara Bush”.
That is what somebody did a couple days ago and it pissed me off. They did not ask a question. The original poster stated as a proven fact that they were sisters.
Later on, the reason the OP gave for their “factual statement” was that “they looked very similar”. You know, because old grey haired ladies never look alike.
Alright. One raver to another, I respect you trying to be a voice of reason here. And yes, outside of SemperSupra's Snow White digs we haven't seen much "evidence" of Betty White's malfeasance. Fair enough that you take this hill and defend it.
That said, I'll keep my eyes open for any pop cultural Satanism regarding BW because at this point it's my belief that Hollywood (magic wand) is the literal definition of a Poisoned Well. Not in a disinformation sense, in a literal POISON sense. 😉
But frankly, my interest in White's filmography is about zero, and free time for films is just a little bit more than that. ☹️
So your response is to get angry over having an opinion? The logical thing to do would be to prove it otherwise. Also instead of getting triggered, present your counter stance and accept that if people want to be wrong, they are allowed to.
I too feel that there needs to be a distinction of fact and opinion posts and that if people make hard claims, they need their hard evidences. You do plenty by asking your questions and exposing what they are claiming. People will read your comments and will see what you're saying and will often times agree that they want to see the receipts.
We pride ourselves in this community on being able to present evidence and facts and do extensive research into topics. But that happens because we are patient with each other and we respect each other's stances but also call out people when they are flat out fuckin wrong. My advice to you is take a breath when you get upset by someone's post and reply calmly AND with good intentions. You'll either be exposed to the truth or call them out on their false truth. And that's really what most of our "misinfo" is. No one here is trying to circulate false info. Most everyone usually is well meaning.
Objectively speaking, racism is not compatible with unity. You can disagree all you want, but your feelings will never equal facts.
I know you lower IQ types are still learning critical thinking and comprehension. But unless you can articulate my hypocrisy, you're just another loudmouth contributing noise.
I really like this comment..."No one is making you click on posts and I know this will be hard to hear, but... this isn't YOUR site. ".....👏
Still waiting on my opportunist fans to chime in, "bUt YoU dEmAnD sTuFf AlL tHe TiMe". Maybe way the fuck back, but in recent history all my posts have been an exchange of ideas and I try to remain in objective fact as best I can.
But no, this community belongs to no one. Not even Q or Trump. We're a free thinking group of Americans (and yes, even our brothers and sisters in other countries are American at heart).
That said, Primaries are coming and we may want to incorporate a vetting process or something so we can help get MAGA candidates noticed and promoted. If we direct our research energy into vetting people, I think we could very easily drain the swamp without the need to conclude Devolution. But everyone has to get on board with the idea.