Anyone who has been here longer than a few months has surely noticed the change in content lately. Provably false posts are being upvoted. There are tons of comments which show ignorance of basic Q theory. Muh racism is being injected into discussions, and accounts I've never seen before are screaming about muh evil Jews.
I'm sure other longtime members can point out more concerning trends. This is just what I've noticed this morning.
Some might attribute all of this to an influx of new accounts who still have much to learn. This is possibly the cause, but several things make me doubt that. For one, I'm not seeing many handshakes. The questionable posts and comments are coming from 'established' accounts. And with the state of things right now (Trump seemingly off the stage & few signs of hope) it makes little sense that new people are joining our community in a sincere effort to learn about Q.
Shills attempting to undermine discussion is nothing new, but I'm seeing a change in strategy. For months we've dealt with doomers popping up left and right, and now they have suddenly gone silent. In their place I see a more sophisticated type of shill, whose goal is to flood this forum with nonsense theories and unsavory content which can be used to discredit the movement.
Other than being more vigilant and vetting things before upvoting, I'm not sure much can be done about this. As always, DEPORT any questionable content and let the mods try and sort it out. I'm sure they are aware of the state of things...
The Parasite Pill is just a hypothesis for why Ivermectin is being fought against by the Globalists
It's a moronic, retarded, "theory" in the same category as flat-earth, it exists for nothing more than to discredit "conspiracy theorists"
I can give you a far better hypothesis, one that actually makes sense:
How about that one? I struggle to understand how it can go straight to "they are sentient demonic parasites!!", get stickied, and get hundreds of upvotes...
Occam's Razor - a scientific and philosophical rule that entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily which is interpreted as requiring that the simplest of competing theories be preferred to the more complex or that explanations of unknown phenomena be sought first in terms of known quantities
To use Occam's Razor on the definition of Occam's Razor -- Keep it simple.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Occam's%20razor
Occam's Razor is not immune to exceptions, however, and at least in terms of a global government controlling people behind the scenes that in itself is an exception to the rule.
So... To me, "sentient parasites are controlling people" is not completely out of the realm of possibility -- after all, parasites can control their hosts in insects, so it stands to reason that it is potentially plausible -- but it is incredibly unlikely as nothing has been documented or studied about it and questions haven't even been asked.
Indeed, right now there is no evidence of any parasite in existence being able to control a human's complex nervous system to any tangible degree. Disrupt our chemical balances and make us more susceptible to irritability, sure. Actively remove thought and control? Not even the smallest bit of likelihood.
To me, Occam's razor is saying, "Look to the simplest explanation first. If this doesn't satisfactorily answer the question, then look to the next simplest explanation...etc. Eventually, you will find the answer. Most of the time, the answer is simple and not overly complicated.
Think of it as building a Rube Goldberg machine to do a simple task. Yes, the machine will work, but there's a much easier way to go about it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rube_Goldberg_machine
Occams razor was created by the DS so people like you would have some "scientific" basis to shutdown people making meaningful connections.
Apply Occams razor to covid, its extremely unlikely by this logic that hundreds of countries could colude to have the exact same rules and practices, its much more likely that theyre all trying their best and following the science but just messing up over and over again. How many resources and decades of planning would it take to make something like this happen? Well none because Occams razor dicates thats too unlikely and it must be simply be stupididty and ignorance...
See, its just bullshit, we need to start fresh and stop parroting these programs.
Agreed fuck occam he is just another faggot
What if I personally find your theory ludicrous? What if I think you're both morons?
Should that matter? Are we arrogant enough to think that way?
Friend, if you can't see the difference between:
I don't know what to tell you
Does it matter that such threads get created? no, usually they just not gain any traction, and die off, as they should
Now when that garbage gets hundreds of upvotes and gets stickied twice, I see it as a major problem, because is this place supposed to be a harbor for normies seeking truth or not?
Now imagine you have been a regular cOViD moron for the last 2 years, avidly following all the propaganda, double masking and all that good stuff.
Then, by some miracle, for whatever reason, you start finally having some independent thought, and things start smelling funny, and you, by doing some digging, end up here.
First thing you see:
Oh gee, I guess these people are fanatic, demented conspiracy theorists after all, lemme get out of here and turn CNN back on!
No, this place was designed to keep Q shit off of The Donald. There is no other reason for it...
You responded to the wrong person I think.
Then downvote it
Yea seemed like coordinated bad faith to me
It's also a hypothesis that holds much weight.
Sure, it might not literally be a 'hive mind', but the fact is that there are demonstrable elements of how parasites can control hosts, given the limits with which we define intelligence, an entity whose thought process aligns with others of its same species could appear as a 'hive mind' in that the distinctions between 'individuals' are lost.
It's surprising how easy people are to criticize elements of a hypothesis in ways that toss out the whole rather than focusing on the undeniable elements and removing the elements in which there is disagreement.