Another disturbing datapoint is that these very toxic batches also happen to have been higher number of states distributed. This makes you think that they wanted toxic batches to reach most number of states.
My God they are developing a weapon!
Just discovered the new Veritas news.
“Military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the gain of function research moratorium.”
I hate to be this guy, but prior to vaccine bullshit i had job where I analyzed data.
While i appreciate where these people are coming from, we do not know the size of each batch to establish a %lethality. All we have is a count for certain batches are higher
This coukd be explainable if the mentioned batches are 10x the size of the other batches.
When i looked at the batches many of them ended in XXXX20 meaning priduced in 2020. Could have process changes between years, or less urgency so smaller batches?
Those batches could have been bigger or smaller but since we do not know, its hard to establish lethality.
This makes sense when you consider the purchase orders as well. I'd have to assume that a specific order wouldn't be more than "x" batches or so(no clue though this would have to be looked into as well). Might be why Trump loves his vax so much?
Exactly. It could be way fucking worse too if the batch sizes for the poisonous ones were actually smaller. Im not saying its either, i just dont have that last variable to have the full picture and can find better ammo with more integrity to fire at the normies.
The onus of providing data transparency is on the manufacturers and CDC/FDA etc. In the absence of such transparency, we will use common sense. They can easily disprove this by releasing full data.
Until then all this hand-wringing aint gonna save any lives. If this analysis happens to be hyperbolic, but results in more data transparency I am all for it.
Another disturbing datapoint is that these very toxic batches also happen to have been higher number of states distributed. This makes you think that they wanted toxic batches to reach most number of states.
My God they are developing a weapon! Just discovered the new Veritas news.
“Military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the gain of function research moratorium.”
Officially they were trying to vaccinate bats. How much more ridiculous does this need to get??
Just wait!
There's only one person I can imagine has an interest in bat vaccinations.
Batman! Has he gone rogue?
Tune in next week to find out!!!!
I hear the jab turned Robin gay, allegedly.
I think we need to remember DARPA listens to Gates all the time. Trusting the government is how we got into this mess.
I hate to be this guy, but prior to vaccine bullshit i had job where I analyzed data.
While i appreciate where these people are coming from, we do not know the size of each batch to establish a %lethality. All we have is a count for certain batches are higher
This coukd be explainable if the mentioned batches are 10x the size of the other batches.
When i looked at the batches many of them ended in XXXX20 meaning priduced in 2020. Could have process changes between years, or less urgency so smaller batches?
Those batches could have been bigger or smaller but since we do not know, its hard to establish lethality.
This makes sense when you consider the purchase orders as well. I'd have to assume that a specific order wouldn't be more than "x" batches or so(no clue though this would have to be looked into as well). Might be why Trump loves his vax so much?
You have to be this guy! Critical thought is a good thing. ;)
Exactly. It could be way fucking worse too if the batch sizes for the poisonous ones were actually smaller. Im not saying its either, i just dont have that last variable to have the full picture and can find better ammo with more integrity to fire at the normies.
The onus of providing data transparency is on the manufacturers and CDC/FDA etc. In the absence of such transparency, we will use common sense. They can easily disprove this by releasing full data.
Until then all this hand-wringing aint gonna save any lives. If this analysis happens to be hyperbolic, but results in more data transparency I am all for it.