Again, here is a copy of the Law of War manual for reference. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf
To start you off, I posted this a few months ago and it explains how the Geneva Convention rules apply when there is a foreign occupation and how the United Nations could get involved if international rules were not followed. https://greatawakening.win/p/13zg9ZWTFC/hello-patriots-i-took-some-time-/
That post led to a conversation about the start date of the occupation. If we have to wait a year, when did it begin? Did it begin when he won the election, when the election was ratified or did it start on inauguration day? I think I found the answer.
If you look at 11.2.4 (page 749) in the Law of War Manual, it says "there is no specific legal requirement that the Occupying Power issue a proclamation of military occupation."
However, it also states "A proclamation may help fix the date of the beginning of the occupation. The proclamation may also advise inhabitants of occupied territory of the rules with which they must comply. In particular, the proclamation may be used to advise inhabitants of changes to law, including penal law."
There it is! "The proclamation may also advise inhabitants of occupied territory of the rules with which they must comply" What did Biden do on his first day in office (Jan 20th)? He signed 17 executive orders telling us the rules with which we must comply. When he signed the EO's, he changed the rules and that was his proclamation of occupation.
If we go to page 1073 section 18.9.3.1 we find " Grave Breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions"
Grave breaches of the GC are those involving any of the following acts, if committed against persons or property protected by the GC:
• willful killing;
• torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;
• willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health;
• unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement of a protected person;
• compelling a protected person to serve in the forces of a hostile Power;
• willfully depriving a protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial prescribed in the GC;
• taking of hostages; and
• extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.
I think it is safe to say that Biden has broken most, if not ALL, of the rules established by the GC. The grave breaches will be used to prosecute him and anyone who participated in this belligerent occupation.
If we go to page 1126, section 18.23.5 "Conspiracy"
The term conspiracy is defined as the combination of minds in an unlawful purpose.
Page 1127, section 18.23.5.1 " Conspiracy to Commit Genocide"
The Genocide Convention provides that conspiracy to commit genocide shall be punishable. Thus, mere agreement by perpetrators to commit genocide may be punishable even if no preparatory act has taken place.
Page 1119, 18.22.3 Official Position Does Not Relieve a Person of Responsibility.
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government official does not relieve him or her of responsibility under international law.
Page 1120, 18.22.4 Acting Pursuant to Orders Does Not Relieve a Person of Responsibility.
The fact that a person acted pursuant to orders of his or her Government or of a superior does not relieve that person from responsibility under international law, provided it was possible in fact for that person to make a moral choice.
To summarize, just following orders will not be a defense, being a head of state will not be a defense and if you conspired with this plandemic, at any level, you will be held responsible and charged with conspiracy to commit genocide. I think Fauci will be the first arrest. "First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction." Q Imagine what will go through the minds of all these liberals when he gets charged with conspiracy to commit genocide. "What did he inject me with?"
How many world leaders will be arrested along with him. It is a conspiracy, "combination of minds in an unlawful purpose".
I think it will happen soon and the cabal knows its coming.
They tried to pass HR-1 in a gutted NASA bill yesterday, They are desperate, they are panicking. Enoy the show.
I have more, I will post it later.
Stay safe my frens!!
WWG1WGA!!!
There must needs be time to persuade the perps to cease their activity, and a reasonable time frame is one year. This has been established through 2 world wars and a handful of large skirmishes that were politicized into combat (Gulf of Tonkin "incident")...
AND there must be time to wake up the normies to what the "occupying force" is doing to them and their country. GENOCIDE is a big deal, and this latest attempt with the plandemic may end up being the worse genocide in world history.
That is worth waiting for. I know this doesn't answer the question of "why a year", but it does make sense that time is needed for the populace to EXPERIENCE tyranny vs. hearing about it from "conspiracy theorists".
Thanks. I fully agree that time is needed. For me, the key factor has always been (well, for the past 2 years) the People. This was really driven home thru 2021, right? It makes no sense for DJT to walk away.... unless it had to be this way. That the DS and Cabal had to be completely and utterly exposed to the People, and that this only really takes place at the precipice.
So, yeah. Time. What I have a lot of trouble with is a) the idea that "you have to wait one year in order to be able to....?" and b) that the 11.3 marker points to the Law of War manual. Neither of those assertions makes any sense to me, and I'm sort of bewildered how others can attach to the theory so strongly, without even offering any real or factual basis IN the Manual itself.
I can not understand your reluctance towards the one year requirement-international laws that the United States has signed on to are binding at this time. Should these be found to have been initiated illegally-as all cabal based treaties/agreements may be spurious. But this is well into the future when "The best is yet to come" happens..
thank you fren. I appreciate your efforts.
I think you misunderstand me. The question is not whether I have some reluctance towards such (I don't) but whether such a one-year requirement (to not engage or respond to a belligerent occupier) actually exists.
I'm listening to other sources now, and the key points have become clearer - the need for not acting against one's own population, doing 'by the book' etc. However, but the source for the "one-year" stipulation still eludes me and the reference to 11.3 I still find .... unenlightening.
thanks again.
That seems exceedingly arbitrary.
In war, you fight. the Manual of War re: occupation deals with when the other guys (your opponent) controls your people and rules they must follow in order to preserve things properly, and not be open to war crimes. Didn't you ever watch Hogan's Heroes?
WW2 took 5+ years, WW1 four. Persuasion to cease activities is called surrender. The enemy doesn't do that just because you wait for a period of time.
We are dealing with CCP owned "Americans" in a territory separate from our own states, a totally different war is being waged now. What you seem to be asking for is Civil War, where battle lines are drawn and defended-which is not in the best interests of the sovereigns of this nation, US..
I I appreciate the response, but ... (screeches brakes) hang on, I'm asking for what???? (OK, gonna ignore that rather lamebrain remark)
If I read you right, you are talking about CCP occupying Washington DC. Is that correct?
Are you saying that 12 months is required to convince the CCP that what they are attempting to do will not work? To what effect? So that they pack up and go home? So that the Cabal says "oh well, we tried. Let's give up now"? ("cease their activity")
Or something else?
12 months, while 'reasonable' seems very arbitrary to me. And besides, the whole premise the OP is working on is that there is some legal reason why 12 months is required before the legitimate sovereign can ... what, act to reclaim its own territory.
Sorry, I cannot see how your assertion here interface with the Law of War manual, specifically Chapter 11.
There ARE Constitutional restraints that MUST be followed for a takedown of the occupiers to truly work: Law of War, the Geneva Convention and whatever other treaties The United States is a signatory of. The 'combat' aspect is the arrest of the traitors and the constitutional requirements of a fair trial that must be maintained-since the courts are hamstrung with corruption and the Maritime Law, the tribunals will be held to pursue justice in a timely manner.
BY THE BOOK, or risk being what we are prosecuting..
Are we looking at it from the wrong perspective? Could the occupying power be the legitimate authority of the United States government in exile through devolution, with the occupying forces the States National Guard and the occupied area being the corporate entity UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?
I am no expert on the law. But I took the "year and a day" requirement to be aimed at the occupiers, not the conquered.
In other words: If what looks like an occupying force moves into a place and occupies that place for a year and a day, that proves their intent to go right on being an occupying force.
Now they've got no other excuse to be there. Now they have proven themselves to be nothing but belligerents.
Now it's showtime.
If the conquered people rise up against them before they've proven themselves to be belligerent occupiers, then UN and/or NATO troops have the right to come in to protect civilians and keep order.
So, we wait a year and a day to:
and
Somebody feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. u/mengderen
Hogans Hero's??? Really??? That series made light of real POWs travails and made the guards look like buffoons which, be most assuredly, were not the case. Better if you watch The Great Escape instead..
You think strangely, Meng. I've watched GE many times, more than once.
(Am I right in guessing that English is not your native language?)
Point is, what the Geneva Convention applies to, and what it is related to.
I am amazed that my writing strikes you as my being ESL.. 🤣 I am an American, born in a Navy hospital midway between VE Day and VJ Day. I was born with a very patriotic last name by the Grace of God, served in the US Navy just before Viet Nam erupted. 😎