If they KNOWINGLY put out a product that causes harm they 100% can (and will) be held liable. In the "vaccines" case it's been proven that they 100% knew it was harmful to the point of death and released it anyway.
Right. Look how many people are lighting torches below! This is an anti-2A argument designed to skew your thinking and entrap your conclusions. PRODUCTS DON'T KILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE.
Except in cases where the consumer users the product correctly, as intended, and follows all safety guidelines, but is still damaged by defaults within the product. Yeah I think in those fucking cases they should be allowed to sue.
No firearm company is mandating police departments to purchase their product and discharge on bystanders.
Government, however, is mandating doctors use defective, harmful products on citizens provided to them exclusively by the pharmaceutical companies. And government, pharma, and the fucking doctors should all be sued out of the holding of all their assets before we hang them.
Well, that’s not totally true. Think auto manufacturers and gun makers. Some can be used for good with common sense, others like the pharma companies make products that are designed to mame and kill and yes THEY should be held 100% accountable.
Guns are literally designed and made to mame and kill. It's not an argument against what you're saying, but at least be honest and correct with your arguments.
In theory yes, but many are intended to put food on the table, not kill humans, and others are for competition and never designed to hurt any living thing, although they easily could be used for that as well.
the more big pharma kills people... eventually, people will start killing them back... starting at the top and working their way down... if the system won't protect the people, then eventually, people will have to protect the people... whatever the means... and it won't be pleasant. there comes a point where people will not get pushed any further.
Immunity shields automatically go bye bye when its proved that the vaccine wasnt developed in line with how they said it was going to be, for that matter it may even be when its proven that the vaccine doesnt stop transmission of covid, the thing it was developed for..
I believe the fraud they've committed will void the contract with the government to absolve them of liability for these jabs specifically. I also think that there needs to be no immunity shields as the post says.
I watched a video Last night with Reiner Fuelmich whos the Head Lawyer leading the Nuremburg (2) Trials,and he had this to say, blew me away, this is what he said, That the Vaccines have (3) Levels of Lethality, Level (1) vaccine harm,you can lose arms leg, or blindness or other, then you have level (2) where you have strokes,blood clots heart attacks ,some will die some survive,then you have level (3) 3000% lethality than level (1) & (2).. that kills you almost emediately,or within a few Hours ar days,.He said the Fact that they have this type of Experiment going on ,within an Experiment Proves Premeditation.That they are all working together in Harmony, He says once they can prove Premeditation ( and they can ) then there is NO Immunity from Prosecution for these So called " vaccine " makers.!!!
How will big pharma explain living parasites in their "vaccines"? Shards of stainless steel? Self-assembling nanobots?
The jabs are not even uniform.. Different lots, different ingredients. Even IF they were safe, which they're not, having different contents in different lots is enough to stop the jabs immediately.
I believe if it is proven that they lied regarding initial testing that the imunity is waved.
^Exactly. If you commit fraud or a crime to get approval they can't be shielded. At a minimum it is a crime.
Forget suing them. These lunatics all need to go to jail for voluntary manslaughter...
Like 50,000 cases of it.
More like take a long fall off a short rope over a mile down cliff and be left as an example ir be lit up in electric chair so hot they glow
why not both?
agreed.
Intent to Commit fraud! Let’s roast these bastards!
Intent to commit crimes against children and humanity.
True. Plus, there is not immunity for crimes against humanity or war crimes.
Just the stunts they pull to evade justice. Mainly installing more corrupt evil in high places to side with them
And prevent all hospitals and doctor's from forcing people to sign waivers before they will treat you....
thats why it is still on an EUA
IIRC, fraud/lying in order to get EUA removes the immunity shield
If they KNOWINGLY put out a product that causes harm they 100% can (and will) be held liable. In the "vaccines" case it's been proven that they 100% knew it was harmful to the point of death and released it anyway.
tar and feather first so they can feel the pain. then the rope
Can we make it electric razor barbed fencing that they swing from, ya know ‘just in case rope ain’t enough
There are different kinds of law enforcement. I suspect the criminals are going to find out the hard way.
They keep changing definitions to cover their 6. I didn’t know they owned Webster….
Haven’t you noticed how the definitions of words keep changing over the years?
I mean.... except for firearms....and prob lots of other products too.....
Right. Look how many people are lighting torches below! This is an anti-2A argument designed to skew your thinking and entrap your conclusions. PRODUCTS DON'T KILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE.
Except in cases where the consumer users the product correctly, as intended, and follows all safety guidelines, but is still damaged by defaults within the product. Yeah I think in those fucking cases they should be allowed to sue.
No firearm company is mandating police departments to purchase their product and discharge on bystanders.
Government, however, is mandating doctors use defective, harmful products on citizens provided to them exclusively by the pharmaceutical companies. And government, pharma, and the fucking doctors should all be sued out of the holding of all their assets before we hang them.
Well, that’s not totally true. Think auto manufacturers and gun makers. Some can be used for good with common sense, others like the pharma companies make products that are designed to mame and kill and yes THEY should be held 100% accountable.
Exactly!
Guns are literally designed and made to mame and kill. It's not an argument against what you're saying, but at least be honest and correct with your arguments.
In theory yes, but many are intended to put food on the table, not kill humans, and others are for competition and never designed to hurt any living thing, although they easily could be used for that as well.
Pharma execs: "OK how much is the fine, 10 billion...and how much did we earn from the crime, 50 billion.... Great job folks, PAY IT"
Yes!
the more big pharma kills people... eventually, people will start killing them back... starting at the top and working their way down... if the system won't protect the people, then eventually, people will have to protect the people... whatever the means... and it won't be pleasant. there comes a point where people will not get pushed any further.
Immunity shields automatically go bye bye when its proved that the vaccine wasnt developed in line with how they said it was going to be, for that matter it may even be when its proven that the vaccine doesnt stop transmission of covid, the thing it was developed for..
I believe the fraud they've committed will void the contract with the government to absolve them of liability for these jabs specifically. I also think that there needs to be no immunity shields as the post says.
If you were forced to get vaxxed as a condition of employment and you end up with vax damage....Workman's Compensation is the way to go.
Lawyer Around the world is licking their chops. Not Only Is Big Pharma Getting rich. Lawyers are going to get filthy rich.
The exact moment the immunity for these death shots is waived, will also the exact same moment they file for bankruptcy protection.
No, people should sue the politicians that gave them that immunity.
I hope I get to serve on a jury where someone has shot a globohomo drug exec who got their loved ones killed...
They will fucking walk .
Those of us who didn't fall for the bullshit should get reparations for having to deal with the bullshit.
I watched a video Last night with Reiner Fuelmich whos the Head Lawyer leading the Nuremburg (2) Trials,and he had this to say, blew me away, this is what he said, That the Vaccines have (3) Levels of Lethality, Level (1) vaccine harm,you can lose arms leg, or blindness or other, then you have level (2) where you have strokes,blood clots heart attacks ,some will die some survive,then you have level (3) 3000% lethality than level (1) & (2).. that kills you almost emediately,or within a few Hours ar days,.He said the Fact that they have this type of Experiment going on ,within an Experiment Proves Premeditation.That they are all working together in Harmony, He says once they can prove Premeditation ( and they can ) then there is NO Immunity from Prosecution for these So called " vaccine " makers.!!!
Amen
What is going to happen in the next two years to the people that got vaccinated is beyond frightening.
How will big pharma explain living parasites in their "vaccines"? Shards of stainless steel? Self-assembling nanobots?
The jabs are not even uniform.. Different lots, different ingredients. Even IF they were safe, which they're not, having different contents in different lots is enough to stop the jabs immediately.
Better het just stop taking thekr destructive meds
Throw qualified immunity for cops in there as well. I understand the idea. That idea has turned into a shield for bad cops.
AMEN!!!