oh, boy. Yup. 100%!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (65)
sorted by:
175,000 lbs of aircraft traveling at over 400 knots. The weight of the roof, weakened support structure, 3 sides strong, one side weak. Inside job, or maybe just not letting a good crisis go to waste.
Not vaccinated. shrug
Traces of thermite, you know. Just normal stuff.
Multi-ton engines and black boxes never found, terrorist passport survives unscathed. I can't believe there are people here who believe this shit.
Me neither digga. 20 years on, tards gonna tard.
Don't ask them to research which people of a particular faith all mysteriously decided to be sick on that day... including that Golem Silverstein, who picked up the big fat insurance check on the other side.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=silverstein%20wtc%20insurance&ko=-1&ia=web
Facts <> FeeFees
The engines weighed about 4 tons each.
The collapsing towers weighed 500,000 tons (each).
What's the mystery? They were atomized. Fist sized pieces were recovered. Finger sized pieces of the 3000 or so people killed were recovered.
Let me guess......nobody died because they didn't pull out an intact body......
This shouldn't require an engineering background. I get why people are skeptical.
But there's a line of credulity, where the consequences of this would have been once understood. Seemingly, that's no longer true. Basic math comprehension is gone.....
Doesn't everybody have magnesium laying around?
Look up what happens when molten aluminum and water mix.
Burning at temperatures way below what's required to even anneal steel, let alone melt it... yeah totally.
An aluminum fuselage turning molten, and water, do not mix well.
Show me where you got jet fuel to burn below 400F. Would make an AWESOME chemistry paper.
how long does it take for jet fuel to burn off in open air?
How long is a piece of string?
Steel annealing is around 1100 degrees genius, jet fuel burns at around 800. The steel also has to be heat soaked for long enough ,usually a couple of hours or more at that temperature. Learn shit. face palm
if 3 sides were weakened then laws of physics dictate that things topple, they don't fall into their own footprint. only a handful of companies around the world could do this as it require very precise timing of explosive that are carefully placed, in yet 2 planes toppled 3 building in that very difficult outcome that day. Explain again how a building never hit was toppled that same way.
Dude that shit was everywhere
For a building designed in the traditional sense. The world trade centers were designed to have more of the weight distributed through the outer walls so as to require less interior support columns, making more room for office space. If the relatively few inner support columns are also damaged and weakend, you would see an implosion rather than toppling. Bear in mind the weight of the roof, which was 6ft thick, concrete and steel.
Not many buildings, if any, were built the way the towers were, so the best we have is computer models. And we know how trustworthy those can be.
You can find pictures of the debris field along Barclay street to see building 7. Even buildings along the north side were hit by falling debris.
The world trace center was retrofitted to withstand multple plane hits. there was a pool of molten steel for weeks after the event. thermite does this, not a plane fuel explosion which could somehow melt the very engine its injected into.
It was never retrofitted. I'm not sure where you got that info. In 1964 they did impact tests and calculated that the towers could withstand an impact from a 707.
And few people claim seeing a pool of molten steel. How do we know it was steel, and not say molten aluminum? Look up what happens when molten aluminim and water mixes. Why did no one take pictures of it? And what is thermite? Iron oxide and aluminum. Both of which would be found in the towers. Are you suggesting that iron microspheres is enough to claim thermite charges?
I'm not saying there was no conspiracy. Only that the end result was probably going to be achieved whether the towers fell or not. Thus why I said "not letting a good crisis go to waste". I believe the planes did the job, but I also believe the attacks were allowed to happen.
Did anyone ask Q who did 9/11?