Where did we go wrong? Why had the sense of collective good disappeared? On a microscale, it
seemed that neighbors were less willing at the dawn of the twenty-first century to take minute
risks or pay taxes on behalf of the health of the overall community. And on a macroscale, the
wealthy world seemed in 2000 to be less willing than they in some cases had been during the days
of colonialism a century earlier to come to the aid of African, South Asian, Eastern European and
Latin American populations. Why?
I'll bet some ivory tower thinktank prick wrote this. As if people not wanting to go along with tyranny are just "less willing to take minute risks or pay taxes on behalf of the overall community." They can accuse everyone of being racist assholes (basically) and that'll excuse whatever failures of leadership they made. No, it's everyone else's fault.
Never forget that the NYT is THE LEADING DISINFORMATION OUTLET of the DS. It is far too late for them to salvage any credibility. As with anything coming from the NYT, one needs to look for the motives and ask yourself, "What is the REAL story here? .... how are they trying to manipulate the narrative now?"
Even if the NYT came out tomorrow and said the 2020 election was full of fraud and deceit, I still would not trust them until I saw a track record of truth for another 10 or 20 years. THAT is how bad they are.
The dam is breaking. The flood of covid/vaxx information, real science and studies is about to hit the normies upsides the head and leave them spinning
Wew - that headline would have gotten anyone's YouTube channel banned for a gorillion years by the Israeli queen of YouTube... but now the Israeli queens of the CDC are doing damage control.
To little, to late. If you had done your job as a legitimate media interest, you wouldn’t be going down. You play, you pay, along with all your “reporters” and “writers” who just printed the narrative rather than actually investigate, critique and report.
'When the Delta variant caused an outbreak in Massachusetts last summer, the fact that three-quarters of those infected were vaccinated led people to mistakenly conclude that the vaccines were powerless against the virus — validating the C.D.C.’s concerns.
But that could have been avoided if the agency had educated the public from the start that as more people are vaccinated, the percentage of vaccinated people who are infected or hospitalized would also rise, public health experts said.'
~Now show us where three-quarters of the UN-vaccinated were also infected and we might have a discussion.~
Also of interest - 'Despite the cautious preparation, the C.D.C. released the wastewater data a week later than planned. It wasn’t because the data wasn’t ready, it was because the systems and how it physically displayed on the page wasn’t working the way that they wanted it to,” Ms. Nordlund said.
The C.D.C. has received more than $1 billion to modernize its systems, which may help pick up the pace, Ms. Nordlund said.'
Too little, too late. Guilty of collusion. No one escapes, no deals.
Exactly. No fucking way do these pricks get a pass on this.
There have been a numerous posts explaining why he did.
But that doesn't change his point that it is a double standard.
You reject their reasonings as wrong in all circumstance, but interject that our guy's reasoning for the same was good and acceptable.
That is essentially the dictionary definition.
Pre-revisionist era.
Here you go: https://greatawakening.win/p/141ro6xrkv/please-read-this-through-everyth/c/
I'll bet some ivory tower thinktank prick wrote this. As if people not wanting to go along with tyranny are just "less willing to take minute risks or pay taxes on behalf of the overall community." They can accuse everyone of being racist assholes (basically) and that'll excuse whatever failures of leadership they made. No, it's everyone else's fault.
Never forget that the NYT is THE LEADING DISINFORMATION OUTLET of the DS. It is far too late for them to salvage any credibility. As with anything coming from the NYT, one needs to look for the motives and ask yourself, "What is the REAL story here? .... how are they trying to manipulate the narrative now?"
Even if the NYT came out tomorrow and said the 2020 election was full of fraud and deceit, I still would not trust them until I saw a track record of truth for another 10 or 20 years. THAT is how bad they are.
The dam is breaking. The flood of covid/vaxx information, real science and studies is about to hit the normies upsides the head and leave them spinning
I will take a bet that the article explains with reasons why this is a good thing.
Wew - that headline would have gotten anyone's YouTube channel banned for a gorillion years by the Israeli queen of YouTube... but now the Israeli queens of the CDC are doing damage control.
I pray this will save lives.
The NYT is trying to save their own skins.
My question is how are they going to spin it to make the bad guys look like the good guys?
To little, to late. If you had done your job as a legitimate media interest, you wouldn’t be going down. You play, you pay, along with all your “reporters” and “writers” who just printed the narrative rather than actually investigate, critique and report.
they are trying to save themselves from NB 2.0 - won't matter - they will pay
Detecting a pattern here?
Subscription wall, but here's sauce
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/health/covid-cdc-data.html
If you view it on your phone you can get past the party wall by going to reader view on iPhone at least
Shocker!
'When the Delta variant caused an outbreak in Massachusetts last summer, the fact that three-quarters of those infected were vaccinated led people to mistakenly conclude that the vaccines were powerless against the virus — validating the C.D.C.’s concerns.
But that could have been avoided if the agency had educated the public from the start that as more people are vaccinated, the percentage of vaccinated people who are infected or hospitalized would also rise, public health experts said.'
~Now show us where three-quarters of the UN-vaccinated were also infected and we might have a discussion.~
Also of interest - 'Despite the cautious preparation, the C.D.C. released the wastewater data a week later than planned. It wasn’t because the data wasn’t ready, it was because the systems and how it physically displayed on the page wasn’t working the way that they wanted it to,” Ms. Nordlund said.
The C.D.C. has received more than $1 billion to modernize its systems, which may help pick up the pace, Ms. Nordlund said.'
Masshole here.....there was no delta variant, just more lies and pretended science
This is the stage where they begin eating each other, deciding who should take the blame.