Q also told us disinfo was necessary. I don't know what to believe anymore because, if you haven't noticed, things in the world are FUCKING CRAZY.
There was a laundry list of evidence to suggest that whoever was posting on Truth as @Q was at the very least a special case. Deltas, getting retweeted by Kash?
Don't act like everyone who fell for this was an idiot because the stuff wouldn't have got stickied if everyone thought it was fake.
Q focused anons onto a topic to flood normie land with info about, keeping us ahead of the news cycle so when happenings happened anon had done their homework.
I'm ok with "fake"q taking the lead if they can perform that role as well as all other Q posters have.
It doesnt mean everyone who fell for it are idiots, it just means they are craving hopium and clinging to something that was intended to be fun out of desperation
Q did say that disinfo was necessary. But how could that be in relation to "no outside comms"? If we are to believe that no outside comms is disinfo, then our trust of Q would dissolve; all we have is the tripcode from 8kun. That's the only thing we have to identify a post as truly being Q. They ONLY thing that would make me think @q was Q would be a post, with his tripcode on 8kun, saying that "yes, that is me on Truth. blah blah blah"
Heres one of my other comments in this thread:
a lot of hints; @q was made before Trump's and Nunes' account were created, and it was created on a 3 yr delta related to truth social
several ReTruths of @q's posts by Nunes and Kash Patel
again: not proven to be Q, but we speculate that it is. the only problem is "no outside comms", so until we get some sort of proof via 8kun with the trip, theres no way to confirm
even if Trump said "Yes, that account is Q" I would still firmly believe it to be disinformation and unproven
I believe Q is a team of people as well and when Patel said he was drinking beer with @q, I thought that was weird.
Having said that, @q is definitely someone who knows what Q is about, knows who supports them (most likely also Truth Social early adopters) and decided to fuck with them by
1: creating an account before anyone else including Trump could therefore rendering legitimacy.
Having a reparte between Kash and Nunes. Both must know about Q (at the very least from a national security- intelligence point of view) and are held in high regard by the truther community.
Posting about Chernobyl before Chernobyl happened giving further credence.
This is a Trump run organization. Qtards trust Trump and whole heartedly believe. Albeit we trust God more but one cannot argue we have an extremely high level of trust in Trump. To allow someone in the TS dev team to use Q to play a “joke” seems sacrilegious to me.
Yes we can argue “oh it’s a test to make sure we stay true to mission….no outside comms etc etc. “…..ok but I will remind everyone that’s also how battered-wife syndrome, Stockholm syndrome starts.
one cannot argue we have an extremely high level of trust in Trump. To allow someone in the TS dev team to use Q to play a “joke” seems sacrilegious to me.
Good question. I'm very upset to say the least
why? Q told us no outside comms. Desperation lead you to believe that was a lie, when you know that it wasn't
I'm not upset, because I knew it wasn't Q
Q also told us disinfo was necessary. I don't know what to believe anymore because, if you haven't noticed, things in the world are FUCKING CRAZY.
There was a laundry list of evidence to suggest that whoever was posting on Truth as @Q was at the very least a special case. Deltas, getting retweeted by Kash?
Don't act like everyone who fell for this was an idiot because the stuff wouldn't have got stickied if everyone thought it was fake.
It isn't who Q is for me as much as what Q did.
Q focused anons onto a topic to flood normie land with info about, keeping us ahead of the news cycle so when happenings happened anon had done their homework.
I'm ok with "fake"q taking the lead if they can perform that role as well as all other Q posters have.
Am I wrong?
It doesnt mean everyone who fell for it are idiots, it just means they are craving hopium and clinging to something that was intended to be fun out of desperation
Q did say that disinfo was necessary. But how could that be in relation to "no outside comms"? If we are to believe that no outside comms is disinfo, then our trust of Q would dissolve; all we have is the tripcode from 8kun. That's the only thing we have to identify a post as truly being Q. They ONLY thing that would make me think @q was Q would be a post, with his tripcode on 8kun, saying that "yes, that is me on Truth. blah blah blah"
Heres one of my other comments in this thread:
a lot of hints; @q was made before Trump's and Nunes' account were created, and it was created on a 3 yr delta related to truth social
several ReTruths of @q's posts by Nunes and Kash Patel
again: not proven to be Q, but we speculate that it is. the only problem is "no outside comms", so until we get some sort of proof via 8kun with the trip, theres no way to confirm
even if Trump said "Yes, that account is Q" I would still firmly believe it to be disinformation and unproven
@q isn't Q until Q says @q is Q. It's just that simple.
My first clue was the Alex Jones meme about "Everyone I disagree with is guilty of child trafficking." That's a pretty stupid meme.
I hope you're right
I believe Q is a team of people as well and when Patel said he was drinking beer with @q, I thought that was weird.
Having said that, @q is definitely someone who knows what Q is about, knows who supports them (most likely also Truth Social early adopters) and decided to fuck with them by
1: creating an account before anyone else including Trump could therefore rendering legitimacy.
Having a reparte between Kash and Nunes. Both must know about Q (at the very least from a national security- intelligence point of view) and are held in high regard by the truther community.
Posting about Chernobyl before Chernobyl happened giving further credence.
This is a Trump run organization. Qtards trust Trump and whole heartedly believe. Albeit we trust God more but one cannot argue we have an extremely high level of trust in Trump. To allow someone in the TS dev team to use Q to play a “joke” seems sacrilegious to me.
Yes we can argue “oh it’s a test to make sure we stay true to mission….no outside comms etc etc. “…..ok but I will remind everyone that’s also how battered-wife syndrome, Stockholm syndrome starts.
Just look at the post that had people finding out who q was based on the carpet of a hotel. And then a day later “oh just a cute nickname…joke joke”.
Kudos to the autists that figured out the clues but it seems like they were made a fool.
If anything it was a diversion. Why are they distracting autists on a wild goose chase when there are bigger fish to fry?
Outstanding point
Trump doesn't fuck around
"a mystery inside a riddle wrapped in an enigma. That kind of stuff is fun!" - like the "Turducken." Yum!
Q said it was a group of under 10, all but three military.