I'm not so hopeful. If the recent paper from MIT on how the vaccine suppresses the immune system is correct, everyone will eventually die from cancer. If their bodies continue to express the spike, their cancer surveillance system is severely hindered leading to waves of cancer through the vaccinated. We're already seeing massive increases in cancers. If expression is permanent then it's a death sentence. Only gene therapy to reverse the expression of the spike protein or immune support systems will save these people now.
Yep, I am sorry about your Mother. I look at medical records every day at my job and I am seeing people with multiple cancers at one time. Had an elderly patient with lung cancer, got the jab then 9 months later had a new cancer(not metastatic) of the colon, then in 2 months, acute leukemia. I've never seen that in 15 years in my position.
I'm terribly sorry to hear that. If you can, I would start her on a treatment of Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and massive doses of vitamin D. You can get the Fenbendazole as a dog dewormer pretty cheap. I don't know what dosages she should take but if the prognosis is stark, I would go with as much as she can safely muster. How bad is it?
That has been my assertion. Question is how long these people can live. And that is where the "human body is resilient" comes in. People live with autoimmune diseases and cancers for decades, some limping along heavily medicated.
I reckon for a lot of people that otherwise had healthy mitochondria it will "just" be a slow descent into a disease state. Auto Immune issues, cancers, neurological issues, nervous system disorders and so on.
I suspect not long. Much of our resilience is rooted in our immune system. If they do indeed have VAIDS then cancers that take years to kill could metastasize much faster. If the MIT paper is correct and current cancer rates are accurate, it's likely millions of vaccinated already have cancer that just hasn't been discovered yet. With no typical immune defense, by the time they have symptoms, it could already be deadly. A comment by a user here comes to mind. Mother diagnosed with cancer. Dead a week or so later. Tumors on every organ in her abdomen. So bad doctors couldn't tell where it originated. Leading me to believe it was more or less unmitigated metastasis.
Takeaway sentence, quote Markus Alden et al. everywhere: "We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure."
It's in your liver in 6 hours. They know because they put it next to a human liver cell line and proved it.
Fauci knew because we have receipts for his buying human livers from aborted fetuses and attaching them to BLT mice. Of course they would have tested a gene therapy (injection) to see if it changed liver DNA. THEY KNEW.
Watch c19 second opinion. Read the MIT paper then read the paper related to OPs post. Im just researching and reporting my findings. Current increases in cancers confirm. If expression is permanent it's logical deduction. Don't have to be a doctor to put 2 and 2 together.
But..not really? The disease is the body doing as it is instructed to do to combat a virus that acts just like a flu or cold, varying from "wow I sneezed" to "holy shit I can't breathe", depending on your health, age and luck.
So the more accurate thing is that the response the body is told to have is an unsafe one causing disease
I believe it means the body will permanently produce the spike protein. Which means it will eventually kill everyone that took the vaccine.
I doubt it… human body is resilient. Even if it was designed to kill, it won’t have the results they were hoping for
I'm not so hopeful. If the recent paper from MIT on how the vaccine suppresses the immune system is correct, everyone will eventually die from cancer. If their bodies continue to express the spike, their cancer surveillance system is severely hindered leading to waves of cancer through the vaccinated. We're already seeing massive increases in cancers. If expression is permanent then it's a death sentence. Only gene therapy to reverse the expression of the spike protein or immune support systems will save these people now.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs
My Mom’s cancer came out of remission shorty after her booster. Now it’s spreading like wildfire and resistant, all in a matter of months.
WhoKnowsAnymore I have family members and friends that this has happened to also
Yep, I am sorry about your Mother. I look at medical records every day at my job and I am seeing people with multiple cancers at one time. Had an elderly patient with lung cancer, got the jab then 9 months later had a new cancer(not metastatic) of the colon, then in 2 months, acute leukemia. I've never seen that in 15 years in my position.
I'm terribly sorry to hear that. If you can, I would start her on a treatment of Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and massive doses of vitamin D. You can get the Fenbendazole as a dog dewormer pretty cheap. I don't know what dosages she should take but if the prognosis is stark, I would go with as much as she can safely muster. How bad is it?
I'm sorry to hear that.
That has been my assertion. Question is how long these people can live. And that is where the "human body is resilient" comes in. People live with autoimmune diseases and cancers for decades, some limping along heavily medicated. I reckon for a lot of people that otherwise had healthy mitochondria it will "just" be a slow descent into a disease state. Auto Immune issues, cancers, neurological issues, nervous system disorders and so on.
I suspect not long. Much of our resilience is rooted in our immune system. If they do indeed have VAIDS then cancers that take years to kill could metastasize much faster. If the MIT paper is correct and current cancer rates are accurate, it's likely millions of vaccinated already have cancer that just hasn't been discovered yet. With no typical immune defense, by the time they have symptoms, it could already be deadly. A comment by a user here comes to mind. Mother diagnosed with cancer. Dead a week or so later. Tumors on every organ in her abdomen. So bad doctors couldn't tell where it originated. Leading me to believe it was more or less unmitigated metastasis.
Takeaway sentence, quote Markus Alden et al. everywhere: "We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure."
It's in your liver in 6 hours. They know because they put it next to a human liver cell line and proved it.
Fauci knew because we have receipts for his buying human livers from aborted fetuses and attaching them to BLT mice. Of course they would have tested a gene therapy (injection) to see if it changed liver DNA. THEY KNEW.
we have a cure for cancer. maybe thats what Q meant when he said "we have the cure."
Cellular apoptosis
Thanks Dr. Put your money where your mouth is and dump your life savings into companies driving these types of treatments.
Watch c19 second opinion. Read the MIT paper then read the paper related to OPs post. Im just researching and reporting my findings. Current increases in cancers confirm. If expression is permanent it's logical deduction. Don't have to be a doctor to put 2 and 2 together.
The average american does not have a resilient body. The body is as resilient as you make it through diet and exercise.
Body may be able to adapt, or a treatment could make it adapt.
The disease is the body's (failed) way of trying to adapt.
But..not really? The disease is the body doing as it is instructed to do to combat a virus that acts just like a flu or cold, varying from "wow I sneezed" to "holy shit I can't breathe", depending on your health, age and luck.
So the more accurate thing is that the response the body is told to have is an unsafe one causing disease
Yes.