Amen. We recall reading a long time ago - documents that pretty much proved that it's next to impossible to create the "n-bomb," due to instability etc. That all the "n-bombs" that (reportedly) went off during ww2, etc. were just massive carpet bombing campaigns. Look at the similarities between the two cities that were (supposedly) "nuked" and Tokyo. Exactly the same. Anyway...
Those documents I read - have been memory-holed off the interwebs. Cannot find them anymore. I wasn't keen enough to download and save back then.
However, since reading those - I never again feared "da bomb." Almost all "scary" things the world cowers over - is pure propaganda. I noticed a lot of people nowadays understand - that if the MSM reports it - it's probably BS.
I read some of the same research years ago and also never saved. Onc of the more convincing points was that agriculture recovered almost immediately around Hiroshima.
All that proves is that the fears of nuclear explosion effects were overdrawn. The radioactivity was not as dreadful as anticipated. So, you started out in ignorance, were misinformed, then found you were wrong---and yet you are clinging to your misinformation. Learning is lost on you.
How does the videos of the nuclear physicist that eats the uranium from the 70s or 80s fit in? Not that I necessarily believe what I saw is what the reality is.
I tend to believe in nuclear weapons but have been unable to determine if it is because of 58 years of propaganda or not. Not that what I believe makes any difference to anything on this subject.
Like anything I keep an open mind as much as I can because of lies and propaganda.
You have to figure out how to discern the lies and propaganda. That requires reading and learning and unifying your knowledge. One thing is for sure, physics is real. Everything about nuclear technology is real. There are books that spill all the beans. Read them.
There was a nuclear scientist who did publicly eat either some uranium or (I think) plutonium, to prove a point about its deadliness as a toxin (not). I wouldn't be up to playing that game, not having a good opinion of heavy metals in general. As far as I know, he never had reason to regret it.
There is such a plenitude of information about nuclear weapons, why would you doubt their existence? Is it because you don't see them going off all the time? Do you doubt the occurrence of massive conventional explosions? They don't happen all the time, either, but when they do, it is a terrible event. (Think Beirut ammonium nitrate stockpile explosion.) Perhaps we should set off a nuke every now and then to convince the scoffing ignoramuses that they should wake up and smell the coffee.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. The uranium bomb destroyed Hiroshima. The plutonium bomb was tested at Trinity and destroyed Nagasaki. In a flash, not in a conflagration. The Japanese knew better; they had been working on the technical problem also. Developments of fission bombs and hydrogen bombs were designed, produced, and tested in the 1950s, and made into operational warheads. The Soviet Union, United Kingdom, France, and China followed suit. Now including India and Israel. We have satellite sensors designed to detect the distinctive double-flash of a nuclear detonation, which is what led to the reported detection of an event by South Africa. Now nuclear tests are conducted underground, but they can still be detected seismically.
How is it possible for fictitious weapons to be detectable by airborne sampling, space observation, and seismology?
Your "documents" are bogus, if they even existed. There was no "carpet-bombing" campaigns against Hiroshima and Nagasaki, only a bomber and some reconnaissance planes. Read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone & Dolan and learn something.
I find it extraordinary that such thinking exists after all the tests during the late 40s into the 50s and early 60s. They were the cause of at least a quarter million deaths from drinking dairy products laden with nuke particles from fallout that drifted east into dairy country.
Add the oneupmanship of the Soviet Union's Tsar Bomba a 50 megaton monster and you have millions of acres of contaminated land and add to that Chernobyl and Fukushima and you have a more perfect poisoning of the world than expected..
Seriously where did this "nukes don't exist" come from? Is it this year's version of the invasion of flat Earthers and moon hoaxers we had last year around this time?
With respect, I think your numbers are unjustifiably high. And difficult to verify. Fukushima, for example, is a nothing, despite all the anxiety hype. Chernobyl was a nasty piece of work, but even that has been overblown.
OK then, just where ARE the 3 corium that escaped their containment 11 years ago?? Enough there to kill the Pacific, if it hasn't already with 500 tons of river water flowing over the corium every single day for the last 11 years. All this is difficult to verify because the japs are lying about everything and putting pretty barriers up to hide reality of the destroyed reactors. We already know the life span of a worker to fall into the pit is less than a minute. Until you do real digging to prove me wrong, my 5-6 years of digging says it IS a huge deal.
My conclusion is that the atom bomb and hydrogen bomb don't exist. However, dirty bombs certainly do exist. A high explosive core surrounded by finely-milled plutonium which is distributed at high speed in a given pattern from an airburst explosion would be indistinguishable from a nuke in terms of effect.
My biology teacher in high school was so cool and smart. His father was classified /hidden in the part of the smallest group on developing the project Manhattan. It was indeed real.
Amen. We recall reading a long time ago - documents that pretty much proved that it's next to impossible to create the "n-bomb," due to instability etc. That all the "n-bombs" that (reportedly) went off during ww2, etc. were just massive carpet bombing campaigns. Look at the similarities between the two cities that were (supposedly) "nuked" and Tokyo. Exactly the same. Anyway...
Those documents I read - have been memory-holed off the interwebs. Cannot find them anymore. I wasn't keen enough to download and save back then.
However, since reading those - I never again feared "da bomb." Almost all "scary" things the world cowers over - is pure propaganda. I noticed a lot of people nowadays understand - that if the MSM reports it - it's probably BS.
Keep your head up.
I read some of the same research years ago and also never saved. Onc of the more convincing points was that agriculture recovered almost immediately around Hiroshima.
All that proves is that the fears of nuclear explosion effects were overdrawn. The radioactivity was not as dreadful as anticipated. So, you started out in ignorance, were misinformed, then found you were wrong---and yet you are clinging to your misinformation. Learning is lost on you.
How does the videos of the nuclear physicist that eats the uranium from the 70s or 80s fit in? Not that I necessarily believe what I saw is what the reality is.
I tend to believe in nuclear weapons but have been unable to determine if it is because of 58 years of propaganda or not. Not that what I believe makes any difference to anything on this subject.
Like anything I keep an open mind as much as I can because of lies and propaganda.
You have to figure out how to discern the lies and propaganda. That requires reading and learning and unifying your knowledge. One thing is for sure, physics is real. Everything about nuclear technology is real. There are books that spill all the beans. Read them.
There was a nuclear scientist who did publicly eat either some uranium or (I think) plutonium, to prove a point about its deadliness as a toxin (not). I wouldn't be up to playing that game, not having a good opinion of heavy metals in general. As far as I know, he never had reason to regret it.
There is such a plenitude of information about nuclear weapons, why would you doubt their existence? Is it because you don't see them going off all the time? Do you doubt the occurrence of massive conventional explosions? They don't happen all the time, either, but when they do, it is a terrible event. (Think Beirut ammonium nitrate stockpile explosion.) Perhaps we should set off a nuke every now and then to convince the scoffing ignoramuses that they should wake up and smell the coffee.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. The uranium bomb destroyed Hiroshima. The plutonium bomb was tested at Trinity and destroyed Nagasaki. In a flash, not in a conflagration. The Japanese knew better; they had been working on the technical problem also. Developments of fission bombs and hydrogen bombs were designed, produced, and tested in the 1950s, and made into operational warheads. The Soviet Union, United Kingdom, France, and China followed suit. Now including India and Israel. We have satellite sensors designed to detect the distinctive double-flash of a nuclear detonation, which is what led to the reported detection of an event by South Africa. Now nuclear tests are conducted underground, but they can still be detected seismically.
How is it possible for fictitious weapons to be detectable by airborne sampling, space observation, and seismology?
Your "documents" are bogus, if they even existed. There was no "carpet-bombing" campaigns against Hiroshima and Nagasaki, only a bomber and some reconnaissance planes. Read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone & Dolan and learn something.
I find it extraordinary that such thinking exists after all the tests during the late 40s into the 50s and early 60s. They were the cause of at least a quarter million deaths from drinking dairy products laden with nuke particles from fallout that drifted east into dairy country.
Add the oneupmanship of the Soviet Union's Tsar Bomba a 50 megaton monster and you have millions of acres of contaminated land and add to that Chernobyl and Fukushima and you have a more perfect poisoning of the world than expected..
Seriously where did this "nukes don't exist" come from? Is it this year's version of the invasion of flat Earthers and moon hoaxers we had last year around this time?
Aberrations come and go, but Truth never changes even when suppressed..
With respect, I think your numbers are unjustifiably high. And difficult to verify. Fukushima, for example, is a nothing, despite all the anxiety hype. Chernobyl was a nasty piece of work, but even that has been overblown.
OK then, just where ARE the 3 corium that escaped their containment 11 years ago?? Enough there to kill the Pacific, if it hasn't already with 500 tons of river water flowing over the corium every single day for the last 11 years. All this is difficult to verify because the japs are lying about everything and putting pretty barriers up to hide reality of the destroyed reactors. We already know the life span of a worker to fall into the pit is less than a minute. Until you do real digging to prove me wrong, my 5-6 years of digging says it IS a huge deal.
My conclusion is that the atom bomb and hydrogen bomb don't exist. However, dirty bombs certainly do exist. A high explosive core surrounded by finely-milled plutonium which is distributed at high speed in a given pattern from an airburst explosion would be indistinguishable from a nuke in terms of effect.
My biology teacher in high school was so cool and smart. His father was classified /hidden in the part of the smallest group on developing the project Manhattan. It was indeed real.
My father was a Navy Nuclear/Chemical Engineer and was literally trained on managing the production of nuclear warheads. They aren't just dirty bombs.
Here's one I made a few decades ago. Anyone who believes they don't exist is mentally ill.
https://litter.catbox.moe/l55b6y.jpg