There quite literally are comms in everything. Basically every IP the public consumes is riddled with code. Video games, music, movies, TV, commercials, memes, streams. ALL of it is full of comms.
It may seem crazy, I totally understand why you might think that, but it's true. This is how the powerful communicate their plans and where real history is recorded.
Just wait until you find out what else isn't real, this rabbit hole seemingly never ends. This blog just put out a new post today and it's loaded with great stuff, it's quite long but well worth the read:
That "source" is concentrated BS. The radiation warning graphic simply symbolizes radiation emanating symmetrically from a source. The "Enola Gay" was named after Paul Tibbets' mother, not as some kind of coded reference to homosexuals. And the "Bockscar" was the bomber that dropped the "Fat Man" bomb on Nagasaki. My father walked the ruins of Nagasaki shortly afterward. It was not a "fire-bombing." The destruction was appalling. The shadows of human beings could be seen where they blocked the flash from the bomb detonation. I have pieces of trinitite from the Trinity detonation test: sand fused into a frit from the heat of the fireball. The "Little Boy" was in no way a precursor for "Fat Man." They were entirely different approaches, and there was only enough enriched uranium to construct one "Little Boy" and it was therefore never tested (they knew it would work, however). So much basic science and history wrong. Anyone reading this material would get de-educated.
Yes, it was. We've gone too far down the road to now think we are standing on thin air. I am surprised you haven't seen the many nuclear test films, impossible to produce with conventional explosives.
I've worked most of my career in strategic defense. Nuclear weapons are real. I worked at a nuclear target. My mentors worked in nuclear weapon delivery system development and production (B-52, B-2, Minuteman, SRAM, ALCM). Frankly, to say that this is all imaginary and fraudulent is revolting. If you disbelieve in reality, you have a serious mental problem---or are incredibly ignorant.
When I am in a discussion and the other party gets emotional and starts throwing accusations I just stop right there. You can't rely on what they say because you know it is coming from somewhere else other than logical argument.
I have a friend who is very into aviation and planespotting. I said to him once that there is considerable evidence that the Apollo moon landings were faked. He went crazy, red in the face and shouting at me that it could not possibly be true. No attempt to debunk my argument. I unintentionally hit him in a sensitive spot by undermining his deep belief in man's ability to achieve flight and conquer space frontiers.
The problem is, how do we know what is real? Film can be created. I didn’t experience it (assuming you can trust what you see, that it’s not a ‘trick’). I was not involved. I say the same thing for viruses, dinosaurs, atoms, etc. I’m not saying they’re all fake - but I’m saying that I have to rely on others’ word because I have no lived experience to help out (and reading it in a textbook or watching an old film is not lived experience).
The point is, I question it. The more I learn the less I know.
Nuclear bombs are explosive information/blackmail. It's right there in the symbol above, it's a film reel.
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/09/08/nuclear-q/
That site is life changibg
Indeed.
This guy sees COMMS in every fucking thing. Borderline insanity
There quite literally are comms in everything. Basically every IP the public consumes is riddled with code. Video games, music, movies, TV, commercials, memes, streams. ALL of it is full of comms.
It may seem crazy, I totally understand why you might think that, but it's true. This is how the powerful communicate their plans and where real history is recorded.
Readjust your tinfoil hat fren!
Tinfoil comms confirmed
The reality is that Satan is god of this world.
Ya but sometimes a cigar is just a cigar
It isn't borderline...
A film reel. Good cartch
Bro, are you fucking telling me nuclear weapons are not fucking real? Man, I can't even with all the shit I'm finding out recently.
Just wait until you find out what else isn't real, this rabbit hole seemingly never ends. This blog just put out a new post today and it's loaded with great stuff, it's quite long but well worth the read:
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2022/02/26/particle-physics-also-ukraine-invasion/
That "source" is concentrated BS. The radiation warning graphic simply symbolizes radiation emanating symmetrically from a source. The "Enola Gay" was named after Paul Tibbets' mother, not as some kind of coded reference to homosexuals. And the "Bockscar" was the bomber that dropped the "Fat Man" bomb on Nagasaki. My father walked the ruins of Nagasaki shortly afterward. It was not a "fire-bombing." The destruction was appalling. The shadows of human beings could be seen where they blocked the flash from the bomb detonation. I have pieces of trinitite from the Trinity detonation test: sand fused into a frit from the heat of the fireball. The "Little Boy" was in no way a precursor for "Fat Man." They were entirely different approaches, and there was only enough enriched uranium to construct one "Little Boy" and it was therefore never tested (they knew it would work, however). So much basic science and history wrong. Anyone reading this material would get de-educated.
If all that history was correct conveyed you may be right. But was it?
Yes, it was. We've gone too far down the road to now think we are standing on thin air. I am surprised you haven't seen the many nuclear test films, impossible to produce with conventional explosives.
I've worked most of my career in strategic defense. Nuclear weapons are real. I worked at a nuclear target. My mentors worked in nuclear weapon delivery system development and production (B-52, B-2, Minuteman, SRAM, ALCM). Frankly, to say that this is all imaginary and fraudulent is revolting. If you disbelieve in reality, you have a serious mental problem---or are incredibly ignorant.
Kinda like flat earthers and those that don't believe in viruses.
When I am in a discussion and the other party gets emotional and starts throwing accusations I just stop right there. You can't rely on what they say because you know it is coming from somewhere else other than logical argument.
I have a friend who is very into aviation and planespotting. I said to him once that there is considerable evidence that the Apollo moon landings were faked. He went crazy, red in the face and shouting at me that it could not possibly be true. No attempt to debunk my argument. I unintentionally hit him in a sensitive spot by undermining his deep belief in man's ability to achieve flight and conquer space frontiers.
The problem is, how do we know what is real? Film can be created. I didn’t experience it (assuming you can trust what you see, that it’s not a ‘trick’). I was not involved. I say the same thing for viruses, dinosaurs, atoms, etc. I’m not saying they’re all fake - but I’m saying that I have to rely on others’ word because I have no lived experience to help out (and reading it in a textbook or watching an old film is not lived experience).
The point is, I question it. The more I learn the less I know.
Username checks out!