Employers can still force employees to wear face masks, even though those are found to be harmful and cause health problems.
The justices must believe that you DON'T have to work for that employer, which requires the Covid vax. In the same way, an employer could require that you have the annual flu shot. If you refuse, you can always quit and work elsewhere.
I have heard of this - but, this would be like the SCOTUS backing up a decision that they MUST lick the radium tipped brushes in order to continue working there, whether or not it is harming them.
SC(r)OTUS only has jurisdiction over the Federal Govt, not individual States or their counties, cities, and towns. Specifically, SC(r)OTUS only has jurisdiction over Federal Mandates, Federal Laws, and Federal Regulations.
There is literally NOTHING in the U.S. Constitution about State mandated public health related laws, mandates, executive memoranda, etc. So, under the U.S. Constitution, what isn't clearly defined as a Federal Right, is remanded to the individual States as State's Rights.
Ergo, SC(r)OTUS has no jurisdiction over what any individual State wants to do re: "public health" mandates, laws, regulations, etc. NY isn't stomping on anyone's rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights, so, NY or any other State can do whatever the Hell it wants in regards to "public health" as long as they don't trample anyone's rights. NY, Cali, NJ, etc aren't specifically descriminating againat one of the already Constitutionallyandated protected classes, like the elderly, women, blacks, gays, etc. This type of mandate is non-descriminatory under the auspices of the current U.S. Constitution.
See, the People have the right to wear a mask, or not. They have the right to take an experimental death jab if they so choose, or not. Conversely, and as a result, th State has the right to deny services to anyone who doesn't want to play [their] game. Businesses have this right, as well. So do public institutions like our public school system. Where the People screwed up was ever allowing the school system to claim that vaccines were required for attendance beginning with Kindergarten. We never fought it, so it's currently Constitutional b cause the States and Fed Govt saw that we didn't care enough to intervene. (I say "we" here, but none of us were alive when these mandates originally started rolling out with the 1918 Spanish Flu "epidemic" and continuing with the Polio "vaccines.")
And because there's nothing in the U.S. Constitution stating a State, City, County, or other such incorporated municipality can't also exclude those who won't wear a mask, or get "vaccinated," it is perfectly legal to do so under the U.S. Constitution.
The U S. Constitution ONLY protects U.S. citizens from FEDERAL GOVERNEMNTAL overreach. Point blank, end of discussion. As a last point, the U.S. Constitution does not protect against corporate tyranny, either. It only protects people against corporate tyranny if the discriminated person is a part of one of the protected classes: elderly, women, blacks, gays, "jews," and Muslims. Since we are a supposedly Christian nation, the Christians don't fall into a protected class, neither do Caucasians because we are the majority.
If you want all this fixed and ended, you MUST fight for it.
SCOTUS doesn't decide cases based on emotions and what they think is "right." They base decisions on law, the actual WORDING of law, and the Constitution. Think of it as a grand intellectual pursuit that parses fine points of law and the Constitution. It's not for emotional lightweight morons like Sotomayor or Kagan.
They denied the request for injunction. Which means it still needs to work through the lower court. It ain't over. Calm the fuck down.
Employers can still force employees to wear face masks, even though those are found to be harmful and cause health problems.
The justices must believe that you DON'T have to work for that employer, which requires the Covid vax. In the same way, an employer could require that you have the annual flu shot. If you refuse, you can always quit and work elsewhere.
I guess you never heard of the Radium girls. They painted radium on clock dials and were taught to lick their brushes to make a fine point.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1799d6A3PUg
mad hatters also got mercury poisoning. https://www.healthguidance.org/entry/17695/1/Mad-Hatter-Disease.html
I have heard of this - but, this would be like the SCOTUS backing up a decision that they MUST lick the radium tipped brushes in order to continue working there, whether or not it is harming them.
Seems like absolutely lunacy.
https://archive.ph/KVJsl
Thank you.
SC(r)OTUS only has jurisdiction over the Federal Govt, not individual States or their counties, cities, and towns. Specifically, SC(r)OTUS only has jurisdiction over Federal Mandates, Federal Laws, and Federal Regulations.
There is literally NOTHING in the U.S. Constitution about State mandated public health related laws, mandates, executive memoranda, etc. So, under the U.S. Constitution, what isn't clearly defined as a Federal Right, is remanded to the individual States as State's Rights.
Ergo, SC(r)OTUS has no jurisdiction over what any individual State wants to do re: "public health" mandates, laws, regulations, etc. NY isn't stomping on anyone's rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights, so, NY or any other State can do whatever the Hell it wants in regards to "public health" as long as they don't trample anyone's rights. NY, Cali, NJ, etc aren't specifically descriminating againat one of the already Constitutionallyandated protected classes, like the elderly, women, blacks, gays, etc. This type of mandate is non-descriminatory under the auspices of the current U.S. Constitution.
See, the People have the right to wear a mask, or not. They have the right to take an experimental death jab if they so choose, or not. Conversely, and as a result, th State has the right to deny services to anyone who doesn't want to play [their] game. Businesses have this right, as well. So do public institutions like our public school system. Where the People screwed up was ever allowing the school system to claim that vaccines were required for attendance beginning with Kindergarten. We never fought it, so it's currently Constitutional b cause the States and Fed Govt saw that we didn't care enough to intervene. (I say "we" here, but none of us were alive when these mandates originally started rolling out with the 1918 Spanish Flu "epidemic" and continuing with the Polio "vaccines.")
And because there's nothing in the U.S. Constitution stating a State, City, County, or other such incorporated municipality can't also exclude those who won't wear a mask, or get "vaccinated," it is perfectly legal to do so under the U.S. Constitution.
The U S. Constitution ONLY protects U.S. citizens from FEDERAL GOVERNEMNTAL overreach. Point blank, end of discussion. As a last point, the U.S. Constitution does not protect against corporate tyranny, either. It only protects people against corporate tyranny if the discriminated person is a part of one of the protected classes: elderly, women, blacks, gays, "jews," and Muslims. Since we are a supposedly Christian nation, the Christians don't fall into a protected class, neither do Caucasians because we are the majority.
If you want all this fixed and ended, you MUST fight for it.
You're slowly becoming TheQStrategy again, bud. At this rate, you'll have to delete this account by the end of the week. ;)
SCOTUS doesn't decide cases based on emotions and what they think is "right." They base decisions on law, the actual WORDING of law, and the Constitution. Think of it as a grand intellectual pursuit that parses fine points of law and the Constitution. It's not for emotional lightweight morons like Sotomayor or Kagan.
By the time we're done with all of this BS, we're going to need a LOT of rope....
Federal court decisions regarding personal health issues are IRRELEVANT. Period. That is all.