A good portion of you that believe this, and 100% of you that wrote this article and run/own this platform.... WILL HANG BY THE NECK UNTIL YOU ARE DEAD, DEAD, DEAD.
(media.greatawakening.win)
THIS IS NOT A GAME
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (109)
sorted by:
What is harsh
Calling for violence in the title. Last thing we need is government coming down here. It paints a target. I suggest you change the title.
For shame. All I see is a call for justice. But you? You twist this into something sinister? Holding the sinister accountable is sinister? How I despise comments like this.
Should evil have a monopoly on the deployment of legally authorized violence? Or do the just and righteous get a chance every now and then?
I suggest you reflect on what you sound like. Human suffering is real. And it sounds like you have it quite comfortable. However, for those not so situated, tolerance of tyrannical violence is not peace nor does it appear to be the Kingdom of Heaven so promised.
OK, sport. I'll change the title.
Of some other anon's post.
LOL
By all means, we must kowtow to our sacred god, "government", at all costs. Great advice for pathetic little cowards.
If you define all execution as violence, then that's on you.
Most well-adjusted, sane people draw a clear distinction between mere violence and the lawful execution of criminals for horrific crimes of unspeakable atrocity.
The title called for justice, not violence. To prevent further embarrassing yourself in public, maybe learn the difference.
And you need to learn more Strategy rather than using Emotion.
LOL What emotion? You're the one who displayed the fear response. I explained that there's a difference between violence and lawful execution, which is what the OP was advocating for serial mass murderers and their accomplices.
I think all executions are violent. How can one be pro life and not take an issue with the state and the powers that be legally killing people, even if they've done something wrong. Easiest way to take away people's rights is to take them away from the "less thans" in society like prisoners. The state shouldn't be in the business of killing even criminals, and I don't see how people can be pro life yet rabid about executing people. If that's the case, you're not pro life, you're just pro birth, and totally pro death at the same time.
Ha ha yes of course, the genocidal pedophiles at the head of the cabal perpetrating systematic torture mass murder on the population of the world are just like MS-13 gang members:
children of a loving God, worthy of our love, kindness, compassion, and respect for their lives, which are absolutely equal in value to those of law-abiding citizens.
Right, Nanzi?
We can tell you're not much of a fan of all the Q posts featuring the Punisher skull or the words PAIN IS COMING, or the ones suggesting John McNoname and GHW Bush didn't exactly die of old age.
The US Constitution also mentions the punishment for treason may include the death penalty.
Correct! The pedophiles, human traffickers, traitors and mass murderers at the top of the cabal are indeed "less than", meaning "less human than" the law-abiding citizens of society. The bad people have sacrificed their rights by their choice of actions against the good people of the species. The most extremely, unspeakably bad people get to sacrifice more than the merely somewhat bad.
They know and understand this better than you do, it seems. Here's Hillary Clinton on Nov. 8, 2016:
You said it, Fatso. Not soon enough, either.
We need to, and shall, take away their rights. All of them. Including the right to freedom and life itself. It's our sacred duty to humanity to prune it of its cancerous growths.
They get to sacrifice everything and be dead instead of alive, while the rest of us get to keep living. Don't be afraid. That's how this works, it's how normal, healthy, robust, responsible human societies have dealt with evil since our inception.
I am anti-abortion! Or pro life! Life of the innocent and I don't think the bad guys you are talking about are innocent. That's a good way to cull the population, hang the bad guys. Works for me.
Justice, not violence.
They'l be tried, be found guilty, and will be executed.
And we will accept nothing less, no deals, no mercy.
Military tribunals, who knows...
I'm with you, put them in a room alone with me, all I need is my hands, let them fight for their lives for all good it'll do to em, I'd just get even more enjoyment out of it.
Even so, in a society ruled by law (which is what we should desire), there must be a trial, even if the outcome is obvious, presumption of innocence should always be the norm.