Indeed. I've seen folks spin this to add in Adam Schiff-like fashion:
“Unfortunately for us, I mean not for us… Unfortunately for the situation, we cannot go in militarily because it will cause WW3.”
That's not what she said. She didn't invoke WWIII until 30 seconds later, after a whole lot of word salad, and needing to go back and call Biden 'President' after she forgot.
If the MIC ATM starts spinning up in Ukraine, all of our Dramatis Personae calling for war ALL get even richer. Their actions are wholly inconsistent with their words. They're not sending troops, because the CANNOT send troops.
It's also why they couldn't stop Russia from getting to the labs. They knew Russia was getting ready to go in, but could do NOTHING to stop it. All they can do now is say, "We stand with Ukraine." That's it.
Everything points to this and seems legit. My only nagging question is how does the horrendous withdrawal from Afghanistan play into it all? Did the Biden Admin make a move before the real generals could stop it, or was it orchestrated to let Biden f-up and his negligence led to the loss of US soldiers? It's the fog of war and lives will be lost, but that whole ordeal seemed so staged with elements of real happenings. Seems like most of America memory-holed that epic failure within a week and moved back to Covid fear porn. Biden couldn't have given two shits about those individuals who paid the ultimate sacrifice and yet, people think he's just a sweet 'ole man. How anyone could look at him and still think he is a good person after the watch incident is beyond my comprehension.
Indeed. I've seen folks spin this to add in Adam Schiff-like fashion:
That's not what she said. She didn't invoke WWIII until 30 seconds later, after a whole lot of word salad, and needing to go back and call Biden 'President' after she forgot.
If the MIC ATM starts spinning up in Ukraine, all of our Dramatis Personae calling for war ALL get even richer. Their actions are wholly inconsistent with their words. They're not sending troops, because the CANNOT send troops.
You'd think they would want WW3. More fear and control.
Not wanting to cause WW3 is their cover for not having the military.
👆 This.
It's not under their control.
Hairy Nancy has about as much control as her dentures do running away from her eyebrows.
Bingo. It's a 'reasonable' position for them to take, since only psychopaths would want WWIII, right?
It's their only play to try and hide their impotence and deflect from the fact that they're holding ZERO cards.
It's also why they couldn't stop Russia from getting to the labs. They knew Russia was getting ready to go in, but could do NOTHING to stop it. All they can do now is say, "We stand with Ukraine." That's it.
Everything points to this and seems legit. My only nagging question is how does the horrendous withdrawal from Afghanistan play into it all? Did the Biden Admin make a move before the real generals could stop it, or was it orchestrated to let Biden f-up and his negligence led to the loss of US soldiers? It's the fog of war and lives will be lost, but that whole ordeal seemed so staged with elements of real happenings. Seems like most of America memory-holed that epic failure within a week and moved back to Covid fear porn. Biden couldn't have given two shits about those individuals who paid the ultimate sacrifice and yet, people think he's just a sweet 'ole man. How anyone could look at him and still think he is a good person after the watch incident is beyond my comprehension.
Because Trump couldn't be president when it, or this Ukraine thing happened.
Let Brandon be the fall guy.
Hence the word "unforunately..."