Which MSM will cover the other MSM going into court? They all colluded together and are named as Defendants if they did collude with Hillary or the DNC. Judging by the MSM's stories, writ large, they breathlessly reported total and complete BS for over 2 years.
This is a MOAB court filing if the judge accepts the case.
So much spin, they can now identify as an apache helicopter.
The suit also contains some factual inaccuracies and some of the same grandiose or exaggerated false claims that Trump has made dozens of times.
The civil suit alleges that Clinton and top Democrats hired lawyers and researchers to fabricate information tying Trump to Russia, and then peddled those lies to the media and to the US government, in hopes of hobbling his chances of winning in 2016. Trump claims they were assisted by "Clinton loyalists" at the FBI, who abused their powers to investigate him out of political animus.
CNN has reached out to many of the defendants for comment. Some attorneys for defendants named in the lawsuit were still digesting it on Thursday.
"We haven't had a chance to read the complaint, but knowing the former President, there's probably very little in there that's true," said Aitan Goelman, who represents former FBI official Peter Strzok.
The Clinton campaign did pay researchers to dig up dirt about Trump and Russia, and well-connected Democrats took some of their findings to law enforcement, believing possible ties between Trump and Russia were worth investigating But many of the key elements of Trump's far-reaching accusations in the lawsuit have previously been debunked by the Justice Department inspector general and by a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee.
I don't see how Trump expects to win in the same court system that would lend huge credence to the justice department inspector general and Senate intelligence committee reports. Both of those sources say the things Trump is accusing are not true. So how is Trump expecting to win?
It really doesn't matter what the Judges Opinion is, it is a Civil Lawsuit, and Trumps Team can introduce anything and everything under the sun.....
Plus it'll be a Jury Court, which means that the odds of getting a Conviction are really, really, Good....
And then AFTER Conviction, comes the Criminal Trial from all the Crimes introduced in the Civil Court, and That Judge will be Barred from the Picking and Choosing of ""Allowable Evidence""......
Once the crimes are introduced in one Court, it has to be accepted in another court.....
I... suspect they shopped venues a tiny bit, to find a place where it would be accepted. The filing is pretty brutal- the statement of facts looks very solid.
Who the hell watches Fake News nowadays anyway? They are viewed by a fraction of a percent of the population. CNN viewership: 400,000. U.S. population: 330 million. Do the math.
Most people don't watch cable news anymore, as shown by your figures. But most people read their news in online articles from the various MSM sources. It's not very insightful to look at cable news watcher numbers when that's just not what's popular anymore. But more than enough people read CNN online articles, and I'd bet that number is much much higher than the TV viewers. MSM is still very, very relevant and read by most normies. Don't fool yourself.
Is this gonna get wide MSM coverage or they gonna pretend it’s not HABBENING with their heads in the sand?
Which MSM will cover the other MSM going into court? They all colluded together and are named as Defendants if they did collude with Hillary or the DNC. Judging by the MSM's stories, writ large, they breathlessly reported total and complete BS for over 2 years.
This is a MOAB court filing if the judge accepts the case.
Front page news on cnn.com https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/24/politics/trump-sues-hillary-clinton/index.html
Funny how they would do this, being an unnamed defendent and all. 😎
Kind of a rock and a hard place at this point.
And/Or
"UNDER NEW OWNERSHIP" sign out front. 😎🙏
So much spin, they can now identify as an apache helicopter.
The suit also contains some factual inaccuracies and some of the same grandiose or exaggerated false claims that Trump has made dozens of times.
The civil suit alleges that Clinton and top Democrats hired lawyers and researchers to fabricate information tying Trump to Russia, and then peddled those lies to the media and to the US government, in hopes of hobbling his chances of winning in 2016. Trump claims they were assisted by "Clinton loyalists" at the FBI, who abused their powers to investigate him out of political animus.
CNN has reached out to many of the defendants for comment. Some attorneys for defendants named in the lawsuit were still digesting it on Thursday.
"We haven't had a chance to read the complaint, but knowing the former President, there's probably very little in there that's true," said Aitan Goelman, who represents former FBI official Peter Strzok.
The Clinton campaign did pay researchers to dig up dirt about Trump and Russia, and well-connected Democrats took some of their findings to law enforcement, believing possible ties between Trump and Russia were worth investigating But many of the key elements of Trump's far-reaching accusations in the lawsuit have previously been debunked by the Justice Department inspector general and by a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee.
I don't see how Trump expects to win in the same court system that would lend huge credence to the justice department inspector general and Senate intelligence committee reports. Both of those sources say the things Trump is accusing are not true. So how is Trump expecting to win?
It really doesn't matter what the Judges Opinion is, it is a Civil Lawsuit, and Trumps Team can introduce anything and everything under the sun.....
Plus it'll be a Jury Court, which means that the odds of getting a Conviction are really, really, Good....
And then AFTER Conviction, comes the Criminal Trial from all the Crimes introduced in the Civil Court, and That Judge will be Barred from the Picking and Choosing of ""Allowable Evidence""......
Once the crimes are introduced in one Court, it has to be accepted in another court.....
Or at least that is how I understand it......
Isn't the jury going to be residents of Florida, DeSantis country?
Yup, and I'll bet my Vets Comp that the trump Team has already vetted every Judge that this could end up in front of.....
I... suspect they shopped venues a tiny bit, to find a place where it would be accepted. The filing is pretty brutal- the statement of facts looks very solid.
Who the hell watches Fake News nowadays anyway? They are viewed by a fraction of a percent of the population. CNN viewership: 400,000. U.S. population: 330 million. Do the math.
Most people don't watch cable news anymore, as shown by your figures. But most people read their news in online articles from the various MSM sources. It's not very insightful to look at cable news watcher numbers when that's just not what's popular anymore. But more than enough people read CNN online articles, and I'd bet that number is much much higher than the TV viewers. MSM is still very, very relevant and read by most normies. Don't fool yourself.
Sadly, the normies do. Especially the elderly. They only know legacy media