It’s hilarious because they do not know who their enemies are. This is has been demonstarated a number of times using Wikipedia.
Oliver Stone’s documentary “The Putin Interviews” has been gaining traction. I’ve been monitoring his Wikipedia page since this started.
I’ve never liked Oliver Stone because of his politics. When I watched his documentary on Ukraine followed by The Putin Interviews I realized I didn’t care what his politics were. Either way I watched the infowar unfold on his Wikipedia page. People started to inject terms like “conspiracy theories”. People would attempt to erase the “new information”. It goes back and fourth if you look at the edit logs. It always appears to be organic but I believe Wikipedia just creates this illusion. Their narrative will be applied to all pages in the end.
They are trying to revise all of history but we are watching them. We are archiving information. Documenting their crimes.
imagine how easy it was to revise history when the only medium of record were books, which would then be peddled as ‘History’ in schools, Universities, which would then be used as ‘Fact’ by the Professors… the cycle goes on.
No different than it is today, but it is much easier to dig for information now than it ever was.
I've always had this kinda joke that what if in 2,000 years the holy war is between Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings.... the two surviving biblical texts.
Not even a knock at religion, just imagining how society can possibly turn more clown world in the future than it already is. Uncover some old simpsons poster and start telling everyone ancient humans were yellow with 4 fingers.
It’s willful ignorance. I explain to someone “just scroll all the way to the bottom for revision history” which brings me down the rabbit hole of “EvEryThInG iS SoUrCeD”.
I think Oliver Stone's politics are rather tolerable in the grand scheme of things. He's been somewhat misrepresented by conservatives over the years as somehow being anti-American and/or pro-Communist, but if you really look at his films and perspectives, he's simply been anti-Deep State and that longer than most.
I think if one were to sit down in conversation with him, he would concede that these smaller nations exploited or manipulated by American deep state tactics fell into the arms of opportunistic communist or socialist regimes, simply because that was the available alternative not because it was actually more ideologically pure than something else.
They refer to Wikipedia for the info. Wikipedia is well known to change/suppress/delete information about things the left seems unacceptable.
kek
It’s hilarious because they do not know who their enemies are. This is has been demonstarated a number of times using Wikipedia.
Oliver Stone’s documentary “The Putin Interviews” has been gaining traction. I’ve been monitoring his Wikipedia page since this started.
I’ve never liked Oliver Stone because of his politics. When I watched his documentary on Ukraine followed by The Putin Interviews I realized I didn’t care what his politics were. Either way I watched the infowar unfold on his Wikipedia page. People started to inject terms like “conspiracy theories”. People would attempt to erase the “new information”. It goes back and fourth if you look at the edit logs. It always appears to be organic but I believe Wikipedia just creates this illusion. Their narrative will be applied to all pages in the end.
They are trying to revise all of history but we are watching them. We are archiving information. Documenting their crimes.
A good thing we have the internet.
imagine how easy it was to revise history when the only medium of record were books, which would then be peddled as ‘History’ in schools, Universities, which would then be used as ‘Fact’ by the Professors… the cycle goes on.
No different than it is today, but it is much easier to dig for information now than it ever was.
Agree, . . ., until such time as they scrub archived pages, sites, documents, videos, etc.
I've always had this kinda joke that what if in 2,000 years the holy war is between Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings.... the two surviving biblical texts.
Not even a knock at religion, just imagining how society can possibly turn more clown world in the future than it already is. Uncover some old simpsons poster and start telling everyone ancient humans were yellow with 4 fingers.
Don’t have to wait that long, this already exist in modern times.
But I highly doubt Harry Potter could possibly lay a claim or be up against something like a LOTR.
Tolkien took inspiration from a deep deep well of mythology, religion, history, etc. He built a massive world.
Team LoTR! :)
Correct. I always get a laugh when my daughter tells me that my sources are bogus cause Wikipedia says so … yeah I’ve tried.
It’s willful ignorance. I explain to someone “just scroll all the way to the bottom for revision history” which brings me down the rabbit hole of “EvEryThInG iS SoUrCeD”.
I think Oliver Stone's politics are rather tolerable in the grand scheme of things. He's been somewhat misrepresented by conservatives over the years as somehow being anti-American and/or pro-Communist, but if you really look at his films and perspectives, he's simply been anti-Deep State and that longer than most.
I think if one were to sit down in conversation with him, he would concede that these smaller nations exploited or manipulated by American deep state tactics fell into the arms of opportunistic communist or socialist regimes, simply because that was the available alternative not because it was actually more ideologically pure than something else.