Can you link to them, or tell me their names, or tell me approximately what minute of the video they are in? I really don't want to watch an hour of Stew Peters.
Thank you for giving me the time. The rest is unnecessary.
This isn't about being "lazy." I work all day long on research and reporting research. Because of other things I have seen of Stew Peters, I think he is likely controlled opposition. I think he is purposeful disinformation designed to discredit us. I don't know that for sure, but that is my takeaway from the times I have forced myself to watch him.
Among other things, I have some level of expertise in the topics he commonly speaks on (biology, chemistry, etc.). My knowledge and experience doesn't make me "right," but it does give me more tools to be critical than most people who listen to him. That experience allows me to make good arguments. In Stew's case I have made many arguments against his "evidence". I generally spend far more time than most people making those arguments because I always read all the source material. It is from the source material and my experience in interpreting those materials that I make my arguments.
Since this is where I make my arguments from anyways, I was hoping someone could provide me with information about the source material. You would think, with all the promotion it is getting, that someone else would have looked at his actual evidence.
Specifically my arguments against Stew or his guests have not been met with reasonable rebuttal or follow up argument; which is to say, as far as I know, my assessment has turned out to be the correct one in previous hoopla over his fear porn. This is why I don't want to waste my time with Stew. It has nothing to do with me being lazy. Nothing could be further from the truth.
In addition, even the very statement; "venom in the water to poison" confuses several things and is almost certainly complete bullshit. The sentence itself is non-sensible if you know what those words mean.
No. That means I'd have to go back and do the work for you.
Don't be such a whiny baby. Do it yourself by watching it on a laptop or desktop computer and use your mouse to push the video forward until you see where they show articles and studies instead of the two men who are talking.
and this is why this psyop exists - to waste anons time, make us focus on this bullshit when so. much. is. habbening right now Its hard to track even without the snake venom shitstorm
Kinda have to agree, take the time to watch it. You can't measure the gravitas of what can be said simply when your listening ears are turned on. There's an evil plot being conducted by for real evil people. I mean at some point you're here because you believe it's "them" anyway right?
This is telling you HOW "they" did it. Because this is what "our" have been proving using surprising method.
Did you think biological weapons have to be announced when the war time referee blows his whistle and says go? No. They do it by starting one person having one idea, and sharing it until they convince people to do it. Thing is, i don't think anyone invited us to the knowledge party where they shared the secret to being rich and getting away with crimes seminar, I think we got sold the bullshit work for a living until you die scam mixed in with manufactured struggles such as famine, pestilence, and a long chain of other bad events that have been manipulated for the sake of money and greed. It's the biggest secret that's ever been done.
You choose the sin, design the scam, profit to their detriment, and then lie to them and say they are now better off for it. How would you know unless you questioned EVERYTHING you've ever known.
You are preaching to the choir about "them" and "their manipulations". That doesn't mean every piece of fear porn is true. Disinformation is a very real thing, designed to discredit and confuse. This smacks of that, and I HATE Stew Peters. He is the king of Fear Porn.
While I suppose I didn't ask for it specifically in my statement above (I have in other threads), I was hoping for his source material. Since I go to the source material anyways, I was hoping I could just start there this time, and not waste an hour of listening to fear porn. (Not) Surprisingly, no one seems to have gone to the source material to see if his statements have merit. They are just promoting it as Truth. This smacks of a psyop to me; controlled opposition.
Watch Anne Vandersteel interview Ardis instead on The Steel Report, under Most Watched. Ardis says the water isn't the main point, but something he was suggesting in passing. It's about the Vax.
Thank you. I've asked in several threads in various ways for the source material on this "big story" that everyone is talking about. It seems that no one has looked at the source material, or at least no one who has also read (and downvoted) my request. Since I generally make my arguments from the source material anyways, I was hoping to start there this time, and skip the Fear Stew. It always leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
Can you link to them, or tell me their names, or tell me approximately what minute of the video they are in? I really don't want to watch an hour of Stew Peters.
Yes at 43:00 he starts talking about the water. That's all I got, don't be lazy if you have any opinion about this, it's worth watching.
He/asked you details because Stew Peters is linked to Charlie Ward and the nesara gesera bullshit.
Charlie ward and pushed by infowars alex jones should give you a pause in this info.
Thank you for giving me the time. The rest is unnecessary.
This isn't about being "lazy." I work all day long on research and reporting research. Because of other things I have seen of Stew Peters, I think he is likely controlled opposition. I think he is purposeful disinformation designed to discredit us. I don't know that for sure, but that is my takeaway from the times I have forced myself to watch him.
Among other things, I have some level of expertise in the topics he commonly speaks on (biology, chemistry, etc.). My knowledge and experience doesn't make me "right," but it does give me more tools to be critical than most people who listen to him. That experience allows me to make good arguments. In Stew's case I have made many arguments against his "evidence". I generally spend far more time than most people making those arguments because I always read all the source material. It is from the source material and my experience in interpreting those materials that I make my arguments.
Since this is where I make my arguments from anyways, I was hoping someone could provide me with information about the source material. You would think, with all the promotion it is getting, that someone else would have looked at his actual evidence.
Specifically my arguments against Stew or his guests have not been met with reasonable rebuttal or follow up argument; which is to say, as far as I know, my assessment has turned out to be the correct one in previous hoopla over his fear porn. This is why I don't want to waste my time with Stew. It has nothing to do with me being lazy. Nothing could be further from the truth.
In addition, even the very statement; "venom in the water to poison" confuses several things and is almost certainly complete bullshit. The sentence itself is non-sensible if you know what those words mean.
No. That means I'd have to go back and do the work for you. Don't be such a whiny baby. Do it yourself by watching it on a laptop or desktop computer and use your mouse to push the video forward until you see where they show articles and studies instead of the two men who are talking.
A simple "no, thanks" would have saved even more precious time
and this is why this psyop exists - to waste anons time, make us focus on this bullshit when so. much. is. habbening right now Its hard to track even without the snake venom shitstorm
Kinda have to agree, take the time to watch it. You can't measure the gravitas of what can be said simply when your listening ears are turned on. There's an evil plot being conducted by for real evil people. I mean at some point you're here because you believe it's "them" anyway right? This is telling you HOW "they" did it. Because this is what "our" have been proving using surprising method. Did you think biological weapons have to be announced when the war time referee blows his whistle and says go? No. They do it by starting one person having one idea, and sharing it until they convince people to do it. Thing is, i don't think anyone invited us to the knowledge party where they shared the secret to being rich and getting away with crimes seminar, I think we got sold the bullshit work for a living until you die scam mixed in with manufactured struggles such as famine, pestilence, and a long chain of other bad events that have been manipulated for the sake of money and greed. It's the biggest secret that's ever been done.
You choose the sin, design the scam, profit to their detriment, and then lie to them and say they are now better off for it. How would you know unless you questioned EVERYTHING you've ever known.
You are preaching to the choir about "them" and "their manipulations". That doesn't mean every piece of fear porn is true. Disinformation is a very real thing, designed to discredit and confuse. This smacks of that, and I HATE Stew Peters. He is the king of Fear Porn.
While I suppose I didn't ask for it specifically in my statement above (I have in other threads), I was hoping for his source material. Since I go to the source material anyways, I was hoping I could just start there this time, and not waste an hour of listening to fear porn. (Not) Surprisingly, no one seems to have gone to the source material to see if his statements have merit. They are just promoting it as Truth. This smacks of a psyop to me; controlled opposition.
Watch Anne Vandersteel interview Ardis instead on The Steel Report, under Most Watched. Ardis says the water isn't the main point, but something he was suggesting in passing. It's about the Vax.
It's not going to convince you because it doesn't hang together properly.
Yes, don't bother watching it.. This will blow over in a couple of days when most anons realise it's hogwash.
Thank you. I've asked in several threads in various ways for the source material on this "big story" that everyone is talking about. It seems that no one has looked at the source material, or at least no one who has also read (and downvoted) my request. Since I generally make my arguments from the source material anyways, I was hoping to start there this time, and skip the Fear Stew. It always leaves a bad taste in my mouth.