Musk is a distraction. Always has been. I've been following Musk/Tesla for more than 5 years. I was an investor in TSLA. Based on my following of him during those 5 years, he should not be trusted.
Here's why:
First and foremost, Musk's takeover of Twitter is the single largest exestential threat to Truth's success. The DS knows Truth is already successful - why there has been so much FUD and short interest in DWAC. We'll come back to this.
Second, Musk has a long history of making intentionally inaccurate and misleading statements via Twitter with the sole purpose of manipulating stock prices, mainly TSLA. For evidence of this, simply look up the SEC sanctions and penalties levied against Musk for numerous material mistatements.
Third, one of Musk's most costly material mistatements was when he claimed that a buyer had been found for Tesla, tweeting "$420. Funding secured". This tweet alone sent the share price up close to 20% before the SEC stepped in due to no buyer even being identified, let alone an offer made. *note the price, $420. 4/20. Stoners. - these figures/prices aren't real - they're nods to meme stonkers.
Fourth, Musk is now offering to buy Twitter for $54.20 a share. There's that "420" again.
Now, back to Musk/DWAC. Dorsey was a DS tool. Just like Zuck. So knowing that Truth is exploding, and represents a true threat to DS narrative control, what's more plausible?
Musk has benefited to the tune of billions from the U.S. government, i.e. they own him. The subsidies to SpaceX and Tesla alone made Musk rich. Then, the corrupt SEC approved a compensation plan for Musk (at Tesla) that was the largest single piece of financial fraud ever.
So if you're the DS, how do you stop Truth? You bring in Musk to "recreate" Twitter, preventing millions of users from ever leaving because Twitter is "reformed". Doesn’t matter if absolutely nothing changes and censorship runs rampant - Musk said he changed it and that will be enough for the normies.
Don't let Musk dustract you. This is just my opinion.
I could do this all day. Just dig into Elon Musk for 5 minutes and you’ll see he is undoubtedly on our side.
He dunks on normies, he calls out left-wing brainwashing and wokeism, he’s anti-communist, he’s anti-government spending, he’s despised by left-wing media and politicians.
I’m not saying he’s the savior of humanity, I’m just saying having him in control of Twitter is a massive win and will play an important role in the ongoing information war.
He could be a WH playing a role or a DS mole playing a role or a double agent. It's very complicated
For sure, anything is possible...But I know where my bet goes...
I mean, SA flag avatar, we love you purkiss but you're not allowed to talk positively about South Africans.
Try and stop me...How about Lara Logan...😉😎
Anything is possible and there are no coincidences 🙃
Twit share price was on steady decline. Find out who sold high volumes after this fiasco. Pump and dump.!
Statement could be true of literally almost anyone. Way to cover all the bases, Ray :)
Thanks.
And it could go deeper: this whole thing could be something to find out who the dissidents are (us) by putting on this show and giving us false hope. Like how Mao called on people to "make suggestions and improvements" but the reality was he was finding out who potential threats were to eliminate them.
Hopefully it's not that
Nothing personal, but I downvote every suggestion I see that the Q phenomenon is or may be a deepstate psy op to generate false hope. That ship has sailed, YEARS ago, anon.
The purpose of GAW is partly to share information and partly to keep spirits up, keep hope and optimism alive. It's crucial to any force fighting a war to maintain strong belief and morale in the face of any odds the enemy might present.
There's an entire .win message board that embraces [the opposite], the Doom Room a/k/a Patriots.win.
Look at his position change between the 2 Cyrus Parsa AI lawsuits. He was the only one in all of big tech who came out favorable, that is with mitigated sentence. Also the only one who "explained" high level AI, that is, assisted. IMO this is where he changed camps. Dig into Cyrus Parsa AI lawsuits, both 2017 and 2019. So much of it refers to Elon, especially the second. But the tone seems to have changed a bit. Just my take. By the way, AI lawsuit being bigger than covud or anything else on the table, was also my take. Looked like genocide of humanity not a light matter.
AND, if CP AI L is true and happening behind the scenes, twit would have already been confiscated, and this is just white hat posturing, a movie scene, or set up for the "announcement". The censorship on said platform has changed noticably over the last 6 months roughly.
O.o
Anti-communist yet still developing the tool needed for the ultimate totalitarian control. Brain chips. Oh, but don’t worry it’s just for health reasons at first. Once the chips are proven to give full cerebral control of the internet you will be like a god. Fine print, Control will work both ways for updates and such. Transhumanism and communism are too good a bedfellows to ignore. You may still argue he is anti-communism but what he is for sure is anti-God.
This! His brain computer chips and transhumanism leanings should make all of us take a sober pause and think about what that really means for humanity. It’s gonna be a hard pass from me, no matter how many leftists he “dunks on”. 🤷🏼♀️
Unpopular opinion but over target. I called out Pence before all that crap went down prior to and during the election. I'm doing the same with Musk.
He's also technically an "African-American" which turns their whole narrative upside down 😆
As do most other controlled opposition types.
He is also funding AI, robot cars, and the transhumaniat goal of machine-brain interface. Which is evil.
Who cares if he dunks on leftists when he is also busy helping fund Evil?
*edit. It is great to see libs head explode. But that is just entertainment. Trolling on twitter and where he spends billions are two very different things.
This is also my take on all this. Hard to overlook hes a money grubbin progressive.
His AI / robot visions are interesting, I'm sure in his mind he believes the "technocracy club" transhumanists are going to push things in a direction that turns out to not be in humanity's best interests, and EM thinks he can pave an alternative path that preserves basic freedoms and human dignity. But I also suspect he's misguided in his assessment of his own abilities to safeguard civilization. For one thing he has zero clue about biophysics and the environmental variables that impact human health in spheres other than just particle based toxins and hazards. Integrating tech "non self" and biology "self" so closely without understanding biophysics is an epic fail.
I agreed with OP on Monday.
After he said no to the board, it made me think he may, indeed be on our side.
Time will tell though...