Funny, when I took Driver's Ed in school I was always told "Ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law." What's not funny is the supposed "stupid" people are the ones who don't get in trouble when they break the law. See James Comey and the "extremely careless" Hildebeast.
Aren't these the same people who claim 45 is evil, dangerous, and a threat? But when it's on the other side, they're just "stoopid", not evil. Argument of convenience.
Except when you have 2 finacial companies that litterally own everything, then its pretty easy to coordinate the entierty if it all. From marketing to news to politics.
There's a fb group called "Refutations to antivax memes"... I guess they think they're funny but it's just illogical dry nothingness.
Stuff like.. "Anyone who thinks the government can conspire to do anything has never sat in on a contractor meeting. They can't even agree on a font."
That is the very argument I get when I even suggest the government's nefarious intentions. "They're not evil, they stooopid."
My usual response, "Why not both?" usually ends with an acknowledgement I could be right. So maddening.
What better way to get away with nefarious actions, than to use a cloak of incompetent stupidity?
This βπΌπ₯
Funny, when I took Driver's Ed in school I was always told "Ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking the law." What's not funny is the supposed "stupid" people are the ones who don't get in trouble when they break the law. See James Comey and the "extremely careless" Hildebeast.
OTH,when I tell some 'based' friends "the best is yet to come" they seem to always respond "I hope so"...
I run into the same thing. I will not let other's pessimism or uncertainty get me down π
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYgJZ79FmBo
To which your reply should be...
If they are so stupid then why are you ok with allowing them to run our country?
Aren't these the same people who claim 45 is evil, dangerous, and a threat? But when it's on the other side, they're just "stoopid", not evil. Argument of convenience.
Sigh, very true.
Except when you have 2 finacial companies that litterally own everything, then its pretty easy to coordinate the entierty if it all. From marketing to news to politics.
What are the two you are referring to?
Blackrock and Vanguard.
Look up top share holders for any company. Any one you can think of and it's garenteed theyre on the list.
Coke, disney, twitter, tesla, media, airlines medical, ect. They own everything.
Theyre some the two largest money holders in the world.
So basically they could crash the entire market by liquidating their assets