💥BOOM!!! Maricopa, AZ Verified With Evidence: Trump 59.4%, Biden 41.17%💥
(cleverjourneys.wordpress.com)
🚔 Crime & Corruption 💸
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (104)
sorted by:
100.57% is the new total?
Math is racist. At least I think so. I'm not a mathematician.
It's ok, I'm a biologist and it looks right to me....it's women's math, so 100.57% is cool and anyone who says otherwise is a bigot and a rayssiss!!
11 is always better than 10...
Only if you're a Marshall Amp.
what the hell is a woman?
Well, what is mine, is mine and what is my hubby's, is mine too! LOL. Seriously, we share.
Sounds like me and my wife as well. But we're happy!
According to the article, its:
Which is 100.643%
Also;
I think what they meant to say was, they are 100.643% certain it is correct.
Talk about making the investigators look like idiots...
Smacks of controlled opposition to me.
They are giving a precision to two decimal places (3 in the case of Biden). In any proper report of measurement, the margin of error is contained within the last digit reported. In this case the error is two places higher than the reported values (at least). It could be even worse since there were almost certainly other candidates (Independent/Green/etc.) that got some votes as well, probably 1-3% of the total, which would suggest the margin of error is before the decimal.
In all cases this makes whoever is making the report look like an idiot to anyone who has ever had to report such numerical information.
Qeq
Probably more proof there's "extra" votes for Biden in there.
well yeah but this is their new "100% confirmed" set of votes... so did they really confirm it or not?
Could also be a typo.
There are no coincidences, controlled opposition guaranteed
That would affect the vote total but not the %.
Edit: I mean it'd affect the % but it wouldn't cause it to go above 100% total since it's not a voter turnout percentage.
Math checks out. I use method Common Core, works every time.
Not only must this article have made a serious typo or make a rounding error, they also did not account for third party votes.