Right. Are we supposed to be proud & happy that our rights, that never we're allowed to be taken from us in the first place, are now being "handed back to us"? Smh...
He made hundreds of appointments. No way you would hear about all of them unless you're some sort of law artist hyperfocused on appointments the way some people planefag.
Hey fren, found someone found her ruling in another thread and thought of you.
Here is the comment with the link, it is the ruling and I am sure you can find the arguments quickly! I'm in a rush right now, but wanted to get back to you.
Ideally, Republics should be based on universal adherence to an abstract rule of law and NOT to personal loyalty. Unfortunately, we've somehow regressed back into a pseduo-feudal/tribal rule where personal loyalty to a tribal chief has primacy over citizenship to the rule of law and public servants. The "chiefs" or "feudal lords" with their retinue and private armies are the elite and globalists with their private wealth. The public servants are simply no match because they don't have that personal loyalty and the wealth and private armies that come with it. My point being, if she had the public state protecting her, this is well and good, but the private armies of these NWO "chiefs" will overpower her and I doubt her private wealth or private armies will be able to protect her.
This is why to a very large extent, Muslim nations and African nations are incapable of sustaining a Republic because the tribal and personal loyalties are waaay too strong. A public servant cannot help but be bound to personal loyalties and will end up circumventing the rule of law in favor of sustaining private wealth and private armies and benefiting his tribal / family relations (just another way of saying nepotism and corruption).
This is essentially what happened in America and the West. It is no longer about the goverment and public servants benefitting the country as a whole, but public servants pretending to be benefitting the public. They are obtaining private wealth and power through abuse of these public offices for their private NWO goals.
Took long enough
Right. Are we supposed to be proud & happy that our rights, that never we're allowed to be taken from us in the first place, are now being "handed back to us"? Smh...
I'm happy that they're back, but pissed we let it get to that. So kind of, in a way, maybe, sort of? 🤔
Exactly, it was overwhelmingly illegal. Shameful it took as long as it did.
Is she single? Asking for a friend.
She remind me of better call SAUL !
What a champ
Much better appointment than Kav or ACB.
Looking like a fox too! Not surprised! Thank you Judge!
What took so long? Now let's start prosecuting the traitors involved in the massive election fraud.
He made hundreds of appointments. No way you would hear about all of them unless you're some sort of law artist hyperfocused on appointments the way some people planefag.
A courtfag
Does anyone have the link to her arguments? Thanks.
Dear lord, I tried to look it up for you, and the flurry of hate-press that arose was enough to make my stomach churn. I tried!
Haha. Thanks for looking.
KickingPugilist found this. Good stuff.
https://pacer-documents.s3.amazonaws.com/40/391798/047124235804.pdf
Hey fren, found someone found her ruling in another thread and thought of you.
Here is the comment with the link, it is the ruling and I am sure you can find the arguments quickly! I'm in a rush right now, but wanted to get back to you.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15HbbYAtcq/x/c/4OXFusXlyKM
Thanks so much! I will pass this on, too. You are appreciated.
Ideally, Republics should be based on universal adherence to an abstract rule of law and NOT to personal loyalty. Unfortunately, we've somehow regressed back into a pseduo-feudal/tribal rule where personal loyalty to a tribal chief has primacy over citizenship to the rule of law and public servants. The "chiefs" or "feudal lords" with their retinue and private armies are the elite and globalists with their private wealth. The public servants are simply no match because they don't have that personal loyalty and the wealth and private armies that come with it. My point being, if she had the public state protecting her, this is well and good, but the private armies of these NWO "chiefs" will overpower her and I doubt her private wealth or private armies will be able to protect her.
This is why to a very large extent, Muslim nations and African nations are incapable of sustaining a Republic because the tribal and personal loyalties are waaay too strong. A public servant cannot help but be bound to personal loyalties and will end up circumventing the rule of law in favor of sustaining private wealth and private armies and benefiting his tribal / family relations (just another way of saying nepotism and corruption).
This is essentially what happened in America and the West. It is no longer about the goverment and public servants benefitting the country as a whole, but public servants pretending to be benefitting the public. They are obtaining private wealth and power through abuse of these public offices for their private NWO goals.
They let her pull the trigger so if SHTF they can just blame Trump's appointee.
Yup I was thinking this same thing. The fake administration approved this for optics
I hope she doesn't have any dirt on Hillary.