. Fuck the victim mentality, stand up and be somebody.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
The blood shed by good Americans during the civil war (yes, it was fought for many other reasons mostly because Cabal wanted to split the country, but the people fought for the ideals -people always fight and die for the ideals) is more than enough to put that chapter behind for good.
Just remember, there was no racism in America for a very long time until a Black man became the President.
Indeed, many founding fathers would have supported freeing the slaves, but the southern colonies wouldn't have joined the Revolution.
we often romanticize history, making it black or white, but history is just as grey as the present. good mixed with bad.
it wasn't that they were southern per say, it was two-fold. they were states controlled by democrats, or people who would eventually become democrats, and they relied on free labor to make their agrarian lifestyle profitable. to them it was the human-powered agrarian machine.
the Northern states, did not rely on slavery since they were not agrarian, they were the first in America to undergo the American industrial revolution. there was no need for slaves. and many in the north would identify as whigs, then as republicans.
In the North, even before 1776, we had Black preachers, preaching to white congregations, and in the south we had Free Blacks who owned Black slaves. the first or one of the first people to own slaves in the US was black.
The entire time there was moral term oil over slavery. When Missouri was being founded people were in an uproar over the future of America and if it would be a country of slavery. this lead to the Missouri compromise
Throughout the slavestates Democrats would often enact several gun laws to try and disarm slaves (they too could own and use guns) some states restricted them to only have possession with express permission from their masters, others outright banned it.
inthe late 1850s in ohio the DNC split the party into two. the north and the south. they both wanted slavery but the north wanted to continue the current trend where slavery is decided when a new state us created, making slavery a state by state issue. the southern democrats wanted slavery to be federalized and made legal in all states. (sounds like typical democrats), this fractured the party.
the democrat-created wilmot proviso removed the missouri compromise, and getting closer to the 1860s many states began restricting gun ownership in fear of a civil war.
since the democrat party was now split with votes they had half the voting power. this is what gave the needed advantage for the republicans to win with Abraham Lincoln.
from here there is a civil war, and if we are to believe certain theories, These united states of America becomes THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Too bad you don't know much about the history of slavery in America. But good try.
Hi I study american history as a hobby. I am a hobbiest historian, and making a website on American history from 1718 to 2022 why do you say such nonsense?
Freeing slaves was always on the roadmap even after the revolution, and in principle there was agreement. The implementation was going to take a long time, both from the point of view of the freed slaves, the society and the economy. However, the Cabal did exactly what they did with BLM, it was no different. There was a reason there were more than one media people who were hung after the war.
Also, the institution of slavery was very different than what we are told. Yes, there were a fraction who treated them savagely, but for the most part they were treated humanely. The best glimpse at what the real relationship was that I could gather was a passage from a story about Thomas Jefferson, where many of his slaves were treated like family and even travelled with him to Europe and what not.
The cabal? You mean Jews? That being said did they want the Christian south to secede or united? I think they want the states united because it would be easier to pull their usual grift and boy did they with Lincoln and finished with Grant and our country was sold to the Satanists.
Mostly they wanted that war because these devils always pull their swindle when we're at war. It left us bankrupt.
Benjamin Franklin was right. We should have never let them in to our country because every country they're in they suck it dry like vampires.
The cabal has always been rooted in the families from the City of London that runs all the central banks and controls the world. If we find ourselves hating any group of people, no matter how misguided they are, they have succeeded in keeping us divided and hating the wrong people.
Jews aren't a race but it's the Satanic system they're in. Now what you just wrote that the Brits are the evil cabal is a new one for me. Personally I never liked the Royals and they seem to play a part in stealing our money as well as the Vatican but the vast majority here will acknowledge who the base culprits are. Have a good one.
Way ahead of you. Thats why I did not use the word "race", but rather "groups of people" because division knows no bounds. They dont care if you hate a particular race, or a particular ideology. They just want you to hate your fellow human beings.
Nope, I did not write this. I wrote "City of London". CoL is not part of Britain even though it's geographically in it. Its a separate soveregn entity, just like Vatican.
The best I have been able to understand the real power structure goes like this.
The most powerful tool of oppression is and always will be Usury. In the current iteration it takes the form of Central Banks - and Usury is targeted at countries rather than individual people. Usury is one of the dark arts, specifically "Magic of Money" where you create money out of thin air and use it to control people. (I mean this literally).
The people who run the Central Banks (directly or indirectly) are the 13 families (and below them their "representatives" - committee of 300). These families themselves are Satanic and they supposedly learnt the "Magic of Money" by generations of their ancestors who sacrificed children to their dark gods.
These ancestors were Khazarians, who pretended to convert into Judaism but continued to practice their dark arts. They have always used Jews as either useful idiots or as human shields (metaphorically). For instance whenever they enter a country they destroy it with their money magic. The people then turn against the Jews and kick them all out.
Different families control different parts of the world, directly or indirectly. I believe Rothschilds control the British Monarchy. The "Crown" is just another tool for these families. Same with Vatican. Same with Israel and same with Saudi Arabia (not any more). Same with USSR - it was just another tool for these people until Stalin kicked their controls out and then they worked hard to dismantle it, just as hard as they created it.
Astors were the original controllers of America. Somewhere along the way Rockefellers came in (I am assuming after John Jacob Astor was killed on Titanic to pave way for the Fed).
Even within these families there seems to be a hierarchy. For instance Rockefellers represent the interests of Rothschilds, and Soros is clearly not at the same level as the rest of them, being a new comer.
This power structure is still very hazy, and incomplete, because I believe, on top of these families from CoL, there are extra-terrestrial beings who control them. They are probably the objects of Satanic worship, but thats purely speculation on my part.
The War of Northern Aggression - or Lincoln's War of Southern Oppression.
Niether. It was a war against Cabal's wishes to divide the country. Even if there was merit for any kind of secession, it should never happen on the terms of the Cabal.
"there was no racism in America for a very long time until a Black man became the President"
ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE.
Lincoln was a True Racist of the highest order - as were most residents of the supposed Union States. Lincoln wanted the new states to be for "Free Whites" with no black people in them, and was a major proponent of forced reverse immigration of blacks to Africa, the Caribbean and South America.
You clearly do not know history. I will strictly state facts that is found within the library of congress (where i research)