It is my understanding that the Ukies were getting ready to invade and purge all the ethnically Russian areas in the east and that Russia pre-empted with their operation. Better to assert the initiative than defend from the back foot. Cornyn's legislation suggests fore knowledge as equipment and supply would be needed to conduct such a campaign. Russian areas have been under attack since at least 2014.
They’re capturing a lot of what winds up in Ukraine is my main point. They’ve captured tons of Javelins which would wreck NATO ground forces.
Afghanistan def keeps most of what was left there to maintain their independence and prevent Pakistan, China or other DS actors from sticking their dick in there. Ensures they can sell their resources on their terms and not deal with some of the BS India has been with their Chinese border which is loaded with Lithium. Sells some shit to Russia, mostly to copy and counter. Fact is most of the shit left in Afghanistan has already been copied by China for years anyways. Ruskies are lowkey needing to balance against China who is eying Cladivostok and Siberia.
Or Cornyn is as ignorant a politician can be. Plying the trade of lawyer-ing is based on theatrical acting. Becoming a politician greatly amplifies the size of the court room.
The commie FDR regime supplied the commie Stalin regime with over 50% of their weapons, equipment, food, etc. even though they couldn't, and never did pay the US back one red cent nor return any equipment that still remained viable - via "The Lend Lease Act or 1942". Without all that free stuff, the USSR would have been crushed in short order.
The Lend Lease Act was between the UK and the USA.
The UK gave up a lot of its Caribbean and other bases around the world in exchange for warships, aircraft, armoured vehicles and other materiel.
It had nothing to do with supplying Russia, that was done by the Royal Navy and other allied navies with convoys into the arctic to the port of Murmansk.
We supplied the USSR with food, ammo, boots, clothing, fuel and other shit via lend-lease. We borrowed the money for the gov’t to buy it under that spending profram and shipped it over the Atlantic to the Brits we received it via terms of lend-lease. It was all fudged but lend-lease was the mechanism by which it happened. We had the royal navy deliver bc we were “neutral”.
Nope -> "Passed on March 11, 1941, this act set up a system that would allow the United States to lend or lease war supplies to ANY NATION deemed "vital to the defense of the United States.""
And what we lent to Uncle Joe far surpassed what we gave to England and France - exponentially more. The Soviets were losing everything to Germany for the first 6 months until the US supplies starting flowing in en masse.
But you're not gonna find this information easily in lamestream sources of course. Nor how the United States (Wall Street) built the Soviet Union post WWII, provided them with all our technology, corporate secrets and of course trillions of taxpayer money as well as $USD $20 & $100 printing plates for them to print at will.
The "cold war" was a farce beginning to end, as virtually all wars were.
Not true. The supplies did not start flowing en masse because logistics, and certainly not after just 6 months of the German invasion.
The US supplied a lot of war material, but so did Britain, and Britain transported all the weaponry and other supplies to Russia through the Arctic. The US did not do a lot in these arctic convoys, there was no route from Alaska to European Russia.
It was Britain that didn't pay back the LL loans as they had given a lot of their bases to the USA.
As for exponentially more, an over inflated term if ever their was one, and lend lease was in the media then and has not been memory holed. 63% of LL went to Britain and other commonwealth countries, the Soviets got 22% and the reminder went to other countries. Source: Imperial War Museum.
The USA or Russia did not win the war, that was won by the Royal Navy in the battle of the Atlantic due to tactics devised by Captain Johnny Walker.
What are your sources for your assertions about lend lease?
You're using lamestream sources with all your stats. The United States financed England, France, Russia and others through non-repayable goods and services all through WWII.
If you're on this board you know the real truth is never told. The "on-book" statistics are always adjusted to fit the preferred narrative while the "off-book" stats are hidden. There's nothing new under the sun.
Take the 2009 "TARP" bill to "bail out" the banks. It passed Congress at something like $700 million. But it turned out to be $29 TRILLION. Even Ron Paul reported on this way back in 2011 or 2013 (can't remember exactly when).
Do you think all the Cooties-1984 CARE's Act" currency that's gone out these last 2 years has been fully reported? The bills from Congress represent a fraction of how much free currency they've printed out of thin air and distributed. An EXPONENTIAL fraction. Every single institution and corporation that "played along" have received outrageously enormous sums, and they still are.
Do you think the "National Debt" is $30 Trillion? That's not even close to the reality. It's likely in the quadrillions now, but nobody can say for sure. The "on books" numbers reported to the public are a joke.
My sources are so wide and varied I can't even recall one specific one to point you to. And further, none are "lamestream certified" so you'll have to contend with that fact. They're all "misinformation sources", just like everything and everyone that questions viruses, vaccines, election results, the 1/6/21 FedSurrection. etc.
The Dennis Wise videos contain a bunch of good info (Europa, The Greatest Story Never Told, The Secret Masonic Victory of WWII). Antony Sutton's book "The Best Enemy Money Can Buy", Benton Bradberry's book "The Myth of German Villainy", Eustace Mullins "The World Order", etc.
The bottom line is, you're only ever going to find, at best, a whiff of the truth when reading anything in the lamestream - since time immemorial. The formula, as best as I can tell, in all popular information sources is: 20% truth - 40% half-truths - 40% outright lies. It's used in every facet of our lives where deceiving the masses gains the cabal an advantage over its peasants.
The Soviet Union had murdered virtually every productive citizen in the middle class by the time Germany attacked them, including virtually all of their military leadership. They had neither the equipment nor the military knowledge on how to defend themselves. Stalin ignored every single piece of advice from his military advisors claiming Germany was going to attack and made zero preparations for it. They were sitting ducks, easy prey as the German military strategists well knew. All they had were expendable "bodies" - lots of 'em.
The sad but simple truth is this; there's an international criminal syndicate that runs everything in every country. Hitler went "off the plan" rogue, and they let him do so, in order to increase their "blood and treasure" coffers. They could have eliminated him at any time had they wanted to. Instead, they preferred the results they got.
A good reporter would ask the Senators these questions re. why this was approved before Russia even moved on Ukraine. What insider knowledge did they have.
It is my understanding that the Ukies were getting ready to invade and purge all the ethnically Russian areas in the east and that Russia pre-empted with their operation. Better to assert the initiative than defend from the back foot. Cornyn's legislation suggests fore knowledge as equipment and supply would be needed to conduct such a campaign. Russian areas have been under attack since at least 2014.
I view it the same as you.
%100 what k was hearing as well.
From high sources - “Get out of Russia. It’s going to get heavy.”
Freaked me out hearing that last one. Sounds like the plan is to go kinetic on Russia at some point.
Remember the theory that the military equipment left behind in Afghanistan was on purpose by the white hats?
I wonder if these weapons being sent will be used to for other purposes (not to take down Russia)
I am guessing that Russia ends up with most of them to fight NATO, or make NATO not want to fight Russia.
Hope so
How in the world does Russia get those weapons, in working condition, from Afghanistan?
They’re capturing a lot of what winds up in Ukraine is my main point. They’ve captured tons of Javelins which would wreck NATO ground forces.
Afghanistan def keeps most of what was left there to maintain their independence and prevent Pakistan, China or other DS actors from sticking their dick in there. Ensures they can sell their resources on their terms and not deal with some of the BS India has been with their Chinese border which is loaded with Lithium. Sells some shit to Russia, mostly to copy and counter. Fact is most of the shit left in Afghanistan has already been copied by China for years anyways. Ruskies are lowkey needing to balance against China who is eying Cladivostok and Siberia.
Or Cornyn is as ignorant a politician can be. Plying the trade of lawyer-ing is based on theatrical acting. Becoming a politician greatly amplifies the size of the court room.
Right out of FDR's playbook for Uncle Joe...
What do you mean?
The commie FDR regime supplied the commie Stalin regime with over 50% of their weapons, equipment, food, etc. even though they couldn't, and never did pay the US back one red cent nor return any equipment that still remained viable - via "The Lend Lease Act or 1942". Without all that free stuff, the USSR would have been crushed in short order.
Not to mention that Russia sold some that aging ammo back to the US in the '90s. Until Clinton put a stop to it.
The Lend Lease Act was between the UK and the USA.
The UK gave up a lot of its Caribbean and other bases around the world in exchange for warships, aircraft, armoured vehicles and other materiel.
It had nothing to do with supplying Russia, that was done by the Royal Navy and other allied navies with convoys into the arctic to the port of Murmansk.
We supplied the USSR with food, ammo, boots, clothing, fuel and other shit via lend-lease. We borrowed the money for the gov’t to buy it under that spending profram and shipped it over the Atlantic to the Brits we received it via terms of lend-lease. It was all fudged but lend-lease was the mechanism by which it happened. We had the royal navy deliver bc we were “neutral”.
YOU had the Royal Navy deliver it? OK fine...
As for neutrality, you say the US did deliver these goods and in the next sentence you say you got the RN to do this as the US couldn't.
It was the British Merchant Navy that transported these goods, not the Royal Navy.
US education has a lot to answer for, a lot.
Lol says the guy who claims we didnt supply the USSR under lend-lease, when it is well documented we did.
Sorry I mispoke about minutia when I was correcting an idiot on more pertinent information while taking a shit. (Not sorry).
Nope -> "Passed on March 11, 1941, this act set up a system that would allow the United States to lend or lease war supplies to ANY NATION deemed "vital to the defense of the United States.""
And what we lent to Uncle Joe far surpassed what we gave to England and France - exponentially more. The Soviets were losing everything to Germany for the first 6 months until the US supplies starting flowing in en masse.
But you're not gonna find this information easily in lamestream sources of course. Nor how the United States (Wall Street) built the Soviet Union post WWII, provided them with all our technology, corporate secrets and of course trillions of taxpayer money as well as $USD $20 & $100 printing plates for them to print at will.
The "cold war" was a farce beginning to end, as virtually all wars were.
Not true. The supplies did not start flowing en masse because logistics, and certainly not after just 6 months of the German invasion.
The US supplied a lot of war material, but so did Britain, and Britain transported all the weaponry and other supplies to Russia through the Arctic. The US did not do a lot in these arctic convoys, there was no route from Alaska to European Russia. It was Britain that didn't pay back the LL loans as they had given a lot of their bases to the USA. As for exponentially more, an over inflated term if ever their was one, and lend lease was in the media then and has not been memory holed. 63% of LL went to Britain and other commonwealth countries, the Soviets got 22% and the reminder went to other countries. Source: Imperial War Museum.
The USA or Russia did not win the war, that was won by the Royal Navy in the battle of the Atlantic due to tactics devised by Captain Johnny Walker.
What are your sources for your assertions about lend lease?
You're using lamestream sources with all your stats. The United States financed England, France, Russia and others through non-repayable goods and services all through WWII.
If you're on this board you know the real truth is never told. The "on-book" statistics are always adjusted to fit the preferred narrative while the "off-book" stats are hidden. There's nothing new under the sun.
Take the 2009 "TARP" bill to "bail out" the banks. It passed Congress at something like $700 million. But it turned out to be $29 TRILLION. Even Ron Paul reported on this way back in 2011 or 2013 (can't remember exactly when).
Do you think all the Cooties-1984 CARE's Act" currency that's gone out these last 2 years has been fully reported? The bills from Congress represent a fraction of how much free currency they've printed out of thin air and distributed. An EXPONENTIAL fraction. Every single institution and corporation that "played along" have received outrageously enormous sums, and they still are.
Do you think the "National Debt" is $30 Trillion? That's not even close to the reality. It's likely in the quadrillions now, but nobody can say for sure. The "on books" numbers reported to the public are a joke.
My sources are so wide and varied I can't even recall one specific one to point you to. And further, none are "lamestream certified" so you'll have to contend with that fact. They're all "misinformation sources", just like everything and everyone that questions viruses, vaccines, election results, the 1/6/21 FedSurrection. etc.
The Dennis Wise videos contain a bunch of good info (Europa, The Greatest Story Never Told, The Secret Masonic Victory of WWII). Antony Sutton's book "The Best Enemy Money Can Buy", Benton Bradberry's book "The Myth of German Villainy", Eustace Mullins "The World Order", etc.
The bottom line is, you're only ever going to find, at best, a whiff of the truth when reading anything in the lamestream - since time immemorial. The formula, as best as I can tell, in all popular information sources is: 20% truth - 40% half-truths - 40% outright lies. It's used in every facet of our lives where deceiving the masses gains the cabal an advantage over its peasants.
The Soviet Union had murdered virtually every productive citizen in the middle class by the time Germany attacked them, including virtually all of their military leadership. They had neither the equipment nor the military knowledge on how to defend themselves. Stalin ignored every single piece of advice from his military advisors claiming Germany was going to attack and made zero preparations for it. They were sitting ducks, easy prey as the German military strategists well knew. All they had were expendable "bodies" - lots of 'em.
The sad but simple truth is this; there's an international criminal syndicate that runs everything in every country. Hitler went "off the plan" rogue, and they let him do so, in order to increase their "blood and treasure" coffers. They could have eliminated him at any time had they wanted to. Instead, they preferred the results they got.
OK, fine, but nothing you say here except for the first sentence has very much to do with lend lease.
Morpheus still bringing the red pills glad to see it
Making Germany not want to fight the Brits by supplying them I’m assuming
Cronyn is a true, real, 💯 % embarrassment to ALL TEXANS.....remember the old Pace Picante Sauce commercials? kek y’all
Get a rope.
https://youtu.be/puwoUKhZQbg
Another good clip!
...doggy winks...
...nice work on the pinned links....
Surprised me. I thought they might each get 10 or 20 upvotes, but otherwise go unnoticed.
...the cream always rises to the top....
A good reporter would ask the Senators these questions re. why this was approved before Russia even moved on Ukraine. What insider knowledge did they have.