Murder of an unborn child is no ones choice. Its murder.

The idea of choice is their argument. Which through current events can easily be translated to "We get to chose everything, you dont". If choice really mattered, they would be advocating for the baby to be born and grow and make a choice for itself.

And Roe vs Wade is nothing other than deciding if its covered under the Constitution. Which it never should have been in the first place.

I personally will never sit and say. Sure, let them kill babies, so I can assume they won't push a mandatory vax. When we should be pushing for preservation of life. Which would.mean no abortion and no death vax, and no trans chemo therapy.

In fact, they are saying theu get to chose for everyone. Leaving RvW in is giving credence to the idea that someone else CAN make the choice for you based on their belifes. Even if it takes a life.

While I believe in "my body, my choice," this simply does not apply to a pregnant woman IMO as now she is carrying a baby, another body and that body is counting on the mother to advocate for it and if she won't somebody else should.

Libertarians will generally agree with this. As a Christian Libertarian I do not agree with the sentiment inclusive of abortion and am very uncomfortable with "gender reassignment" if one can be reassigned. But I unequivocally do not agree that I am responsible for subsidizing those "personal choices" or paying to mitigate the consequences of them. Absolutely no tax support either directly or indirectly (write offs for charitable donations to sponsoring and defending organizations)

Tell me how the infant consents to being aborted.

Murder of another and allowing someone to inject a poison into your veins are two entirely different things, shill.

My body my choice , and I choose to be born.

What's the saying? Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face. Well we all have a opinion until it comes to our doorstep. When I was young and liberal in my opinions, I thought I was pro choice. Then she told me that she was going to abort my second child. I really struggled, I was crying and I'm sure even praying. There was nothing I could do in the situation. Then a thought came, maybe even divine intervention. I did the only thing I could think of. I told her mom on her lol. I wept and sobbed in her mom's ear. Long story short her mom set the matter straight real quick. Now I know exactly where I stand on the issue. But I had to be presented with the reality of what my ignorant opinions really look like. But I agree with the author of the post. This is merely a set up of something more sinister.

Anything after a heartbeat is murder. At that point it is no longer just her body. She is sharing it until birth. A child with a heartbeat has a choice and trust me when i say im sure they choose to live.

I’m sure the baby’s choice wouldn’t be to die.

You are 100% correct, it is an individuals choice. Murder, is a choice. The only difference here is that they are a protected class of murderers.

It’s a separate human being dependent on it’s mother to develop, yes, but then so is the newborn. If you think it’s murder to kill a days old/weeks old newborn it is murder to kill a baby in utero. It is not a baby only when it is convenient to call it a baby. We cannot cry for the mothers who lost their babies to miscarriage and yet dismiss others in the same stage of development as a clump of cells that have no value. We cannot spend millions of dollars developing procedures to save babies in utero and yet dismiss others in the same stage of development as a clump of cells with no value. We can’t. It defies logic

ETA… also, don’t forget that it is not like pregnancy can’t be prevented. It can. If you really really don’t want to get pregnant, you won’t get pregnant. Personal responsibility 101

You are exactly correct. That is why our constitution protects babies inside the womb from being forced to get a medical procedure done to them without their consent.

It's absolutely a win. This (still-not-finalized) decision returns and regulation over bodily sovereignty to the state rather than the feds. This is much closer to individuals than anytimein the past 50 years.

"Your body your choice" could also mean that you leave your body in the middle of the road to block traffic; or that you direct your first into to another's face. Society in general has a vested interest in preventing you from doing either, and that's why laws are made. The state, being closer to the individual than the federal government, is a much better place for these choices to be made.

it should apply to a body, for whatever reason, is inside you, a human baby growing in the womb. Just because a body in you cannot speak doesn't mean you who can speak has the say over the body inside you. The owner of that body must have a say.

Life begins at conception.

Just because "my body, my choice" is a useful slogan, a mandatory vaxx is not like a voluntary abortion. A mandatory vaxx is much more like a mandatory abortion. To which, "my body, my choice" also applies. Don't get hung up on a slogan.

Abortion, vaccination, and hormonal treatment affect more than one physical body when one is pregnant. Also nobody will be forcing us to do anything. Maybe they think this will get them the mandatory va😵, but it will backfire on them. Saving babies' lives is always a good thing. Anyway, "mandatory" to them means "bully you to do ______", and not "this is a lawful decree". These bullies must be disobeyed if they try to force unlawful stuff upon us. Medical rape is rape. We're not going to take it anymore and let the little ones live! 🙏💪

A woman does have a choice, but it ends when she decides to have unprotected sex and becomes pregnant as a result of her choice.

If a woman chooses not to keep her baby, then there are plenty of loving parents waiting to adopt.

I disagree. There is no equivalent to the crimes of mass murder of babies.