I hoped this wasn't going to happen. Earlier, I posted my concerns that this Obama judge was reenacting the same playbook as Judge Emmet Sullivan with General Flynn.
"If the judge ruled in favor of Durham, why does the judge still need to review them to determine if they are "privileged"? I Thought the entire argument over GPS Fusion was whether they were attorney-client; therefore "privileged". The judge ruled stating they are not privileged. So, why is the judge still involved?
I know this is a Obama appointed judge. Is this starting to look like a reenactment of Judge Emmet Sullivan's shenanigan's with General Flynn?"
We'll see what Durham does with it. The judge decided to rule on the specific charge, and not the conspiracy. It will make the Sussman case go faster.
Durham's previous indictments were part of the same conspiracy, but Sussman was charged separately when his time came. I see no reason why that can't happen the same way with Joffe and, when the time comes, Hillary and Obama.
My concern is why doesn't Durham have the same latitude and power as Mueller did? Remember they used the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to raid Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen. This was during Trump's presidency. Stephen Ryan, Cohen's lawyer, said in a statement. "I have been advised by federal prosecutors that the New York action is, in part, a referral by the Office of Special Counsel, Robert Mueller." Ryan called the search "completely inappropriate and unnecessary" and said authorities had seized "protected attorney client communications between a lawyer and his clients." He added that Cohen had previously cooperated with government investigations, including in Congress. McClatchy reported last week that Mueller was looking into Cohen and the Trump Organization. Cohen was involved in overseas business deals, the report said.
Durham is investigating the exact same thing, but as a fraud. Why doesn't Durham have the same latitude as Mueller? The answer is obvious -- Judge Cooper is another biased Judge like Emmitt Sullivan was.
If the judge initially ruled in favor of Durham, why does the judge still need to review the the Fusion GPS documents to determine if they are "privileged? Didn't Cooper just rule they are not privileged? Why are the Fusion GPS subpoenaed documents viewed by 'court camera'? This suggests this Judge is throttling the investigation. They should have been sent to Durham carte blanche for his review.
I don't think this is very concerning. Durham didn't charge Sussman with a conspiracy but instead is getting all he can for the charges he has filed. I'll be worried if Durham doesn't file new charges for conspiracy...perhaps and hopefully he's teeing up Sussman now to spill the beans along with others plus the other available evidence
Having read this, it really sounds like Sussman is going to end not convicted of anything. This Obama appointed judge is biased. If we draw from the conclusion there was no Alpha Bank - Trump connection, then who fabricated this fraudulent 'evidence? Are we to believe each actor of this fraud didn't know the 'evidence' was fake? This judge is disassembling the RICO case.
Compare this judge to the judge's for Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, and Roger Stone. All of them were Demwit appointed Judge's too.
I expected more like this, actually.
Can't justify the military taking over prosecution and establishing tribunals as long as it can be shown that the court system functions properly.
We know it's corrupt from the floor up, but the normies have to be made to see it too.
What better way than to get the most aggressively evil people in our country constantly being given top cover by those same corrupt courts?
I hoped this wasn't going to happen. Earlier, I posted my concerns that this Obama judge was reenacting the same playbook as Judge Emmet Sullivan with General Flynn.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15HuoEKUkS/update--durham-won-the-first-par/
"If the judge ruled in favor of Durham, why does the judge still need to review them to determine if they are "privileged"? I Thought the entire argument over GPS Fusion was whether they were attorney-client; therefore "privileged". The judge ruled stating they are not privileged. So, why is the judge still involved?
I know this is a Obama appointed judge. Is this starting to look like a reenactment of Judge Emmet Sullivan's shenanigan's with General Flynn?"
We'll see what Durham does with it. The judge decided to rule on the specific charge, and not the conspiracy. It will make the Sussman case go faster.
Durham's previous indictments were part of the same conspiracy, but Sussman was charged separately when his time came. I see no reason why that can't happen the same way with Joffe and, when the time comes, Hillary and Obama.
My concern is why doesn't Durham have the same latitude and power as Mueller did? Remember they used the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to raid Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen. This was during Trump's presidency. Stephen Ryan, Cohen's lawyer, said in a statement. "I have been advised by federal prosecutors that the New York action is, in part, a referral by the Office of Special Counsel, Robert Mueller." Ryan called the search "completely inappropriate and unnecessary" and said authorities had seized "protected attorney client communications between a lawyer and his clients." He added that Cohen had previously cooperated with government investigations, including in Congress. McClatchy reported last week that Mueller was looking into Cohen and the Trump Organization. Cohen was involved in overseas business deals, the report said.
Durham is investigating the exact same thing, but as a fraud. Why doesn't Durham have the same latitude as Mueller? The answer is obvious -- Judge Cooper is another biased Judge like Emmitt Sullivan was.
If the judge initially ruled in favor of Durham, why does the judge still need to review the the Fusion GPS documents to determine if they are "privileged? Didn't Cooper just rule they are not privileged? Why are the Fusion GPS subpoenaed documents viewed by 'court camera'? This suggests this Judge is throttling the investigation. They should have been sent to Durham carte blanche for his review.
Exactly. I think this is big. Like the end to any rico/ conspiricy. Sussman stands alone. Lots of big sighs tonight.
I will be interested to get tecnofog take on this. Thinking not a good day for Durham.
I don't think this is very concerning. Durham didn't charge Sussman with a conspiracy but instead is getting all he can for the charges he has filed. I'll be worried if Durham doesn't file new charges for conspiracy...perhaps and hopefully he's teeing up Sussman now to spill the beans along with others plus the other available evidence
Fake news from a fake news source.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.121.0.pdf
This is the ruling...from the source
Earlier this week, there were posts here on GAW saying a judge sided with Durham over Killary.
She's walkin
Having read this, it really sounds like Sussman is going to end not convicted of anything. This Obama appointed judge is biased. If we draw from the conclusion there was no Alpha Bank - Trump connection, then who fabricated this fraudulent 'evidence? Are we to believe each actor of this fraud didn't know the 'evidence' was fake? This judge is disassembling the RICO case.
Compare this judge to the judge's for Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, and Roger Stone. All of them were Demwit appointed Judge's too.