The Insurrection Act part is pretty interesting too. He didn't need it, tells me there was something else planned. Or nothing, but Trump doesn't lose so I lean towards "something else".
Yeah, that part confused me. He’s saying he didn’t invoke the Insurrection Act, but we know that he did, and that it’s a huge part of the plan. Oh well, it’s probably just more 5D chess.
Maybe there is a PEAD that was invoked that supersedes the public Insurrection act....meaning it was 'not needed' and why the Dems were so desperate to find out what they were and if he used them.
And if it was invoked (and it seems all the attacks should have met whatever emergency requirements would be in place - no one outside of a very few would even know about it.
That settles the question of whether he ever invoked the Insurrection Act.
Not sure if Patriot Patel's Devolution series hinges on such an invocation or not - would have to read it again in great detail
I kind of wish he had remained in office instead of waiting until 2.5 years from now to return, which on Friday night he called a "very reasonable" amount of time to wait. I about fell out when he said that part. Still, he has all the facts we have plus ten times more, so his estimation of the correct timing has to be more accurate than ours.
Longer time goes on and the illegitimate Brandon sits in what looks like the House of White decor the more good hearted patriots are losing hope. Big players in the fraud appear to walk free with zero consequences
No actually it doesn't, someone above this comment says it sounds like he said he didn't invoke it involving January 6th. If that's the case, PDJT has been telling us for a long time the real Insurrection took place on November 3rd. I read a while back, not sure if it was before devolution was written, that he invoked it in the early morning hours of November 4th, before Biden was announced as winning the election.
I don't know how much clearer people need this to be, or how much clearer it could actually be.
It's not like the president to ever lie, especially about something important, and especially in writing. If he had ever invoked the Insurrection Act, IMHO he would more likely refrain from referring to it (or create an ambiguous statement that could be interpreted multiple ways) than lie about it and flatly say he never invoked it.
I think the "No comment" is the most interesting answer.
The Insurrection Act part is pretty interesting too. He didn't need it, tells me there was something else planned. Or nothing, but Trump doesn't lose so I lean towards "something else".
To me also.
I don’t recall, is any part of devolution predicated on the fact that President Trump invoked the Insurrection Act?
Yeah, that part confused me. He’s saying he didn’t invoke the Insurrection Act, but we know that he did, and that it’s a huge part of the plan. Oh well, it’s probably just more 5D chess.
The interesting part, to me, was the part that says he didn't NEED to invoke it.
What I read it as saying is President Trump didn't invoke the Insurrection Act over Jan 6 event. Just that.
I don't think he was talking only about the South American "Drug Cartels".
Maybe there is a PEAD that was invoked that supersedes the public Insurrection act....meaning it was 'not needed' and why the Dems were so desperate to find out what they were and if he used them.
And if it was invoked (and it seems all the attacks should have met whatever emergency requirements would be in place - no one outside of a very few would even know about it.
That settles the question of whether he ever invoked the Insurrection Act.
Not sure if Patriot Patel's Devolution series hinges on such an invocation or not - would have to read it again in great detail
I kind of wish he had remained in office instead of waiting until 2.5 years from now to return, which on Friday night he called a "very reasonable" amount of time to wait. I about fell out when he said that part. Still, he has all the facts we have plus ten times more, so his estimation of the correct timing has to be more accurate than ours.
Longer time goes on and the illegitimate Brandon sits in what looks like the House of White decor the more good hearted patriots are losing hope. Big players in the fraud appear to walk free with zero consequences
No actually it doesn't, someone above this comment says it sounds like he said he didn't invoke it involving January 6th. If that's the case, PDJT has been telling us for a long time the real Insurrection took place on November 3rd. I read a while back, not sure if it was before devolution was written, that he invoked it in the early morning hours of November 4th, before Biden was announced as winning the election.
I don't know how much clearer people need this to be, or how much clearer it could actually be.
It's not like the president to ever lie, especially about something important, and especially in writing. If he had ever invoked the Insurrection Act, IMHO he would more likely refrain from referring to it (or create an ambiguous statement that could be interpreted multiple ways) than lie about it and flatly say he never invoked it.
He said he took the Pfizer and booster, do you believe him?
As I recall there was a movie that had the president attack the cartels with missiles. Is that where the idea came from?
Note that Trump called him "Yesper." He must have been a yes-man.