NaMe OnE tHiNg Q eVeR cAlLeD rIgHt
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Exponential updoots!
Supreme Court Justices have had full time protection for decades. They have their own police force when they are in DC and are protected by US Marshals when they travel. When there have been threats due to controversial cases they're doing, they get additional protection.
I really don't understand why Q would post this. He should have been well aware of it. It's not a secret.
This type of thing really bothers me. It's what normies use to discredit all of Q's posts.
Because they're being protected at their homes now and so are members of their immediate families.
They have always had full time security at their homes. Garland simply appointed US Marshals to provide extra protection, alongside the Supreme Court police who typically provide protection for them.
Having security people patrolling the outside of the house is not the only way to protect people. It's simply a more visible way.
Unless members of their immediate family are living with them, they are NOT currently getting protection. That's why you're seeing stories in the news about the bill, the Supreme Court Police Parity Act, being held up in the House by Democrats. It was introduced by a Republican and passed the Senate vote, but now it's being stalled in the House.
Again, read it. FULL TIME.
Now at their homes.
Again, they have always had full time protection at their homes. Garland has provided them with extra protection by placing US Marshals ( who usually only provide protection when they travel) to patrol the outside grounds.
Simply because they now have a highly visible outside protection detail doesn't mean they haven't had full time protection at home from the Supreme Court police previously.
People don't believe anonymous posts claiming to be insiders who screw up really obvious basic things an insider would already know. You choose to ignore the obvious flaws and have faith, most do not and rightfully questions it.
Wait, I'm confused. What exactly am I ignoring and having faith in?
One thing Q believers ignore is where he refused to use PGP signatures, claiming it wasn't considered secure by some secret requirement. Yet, he used the board insecure hash system, which let people crack several of Q passcodes.
I was late to the Q community. I didn't learn about it until the beginning of the pandemic, so I missed out on all of that.
I think it’s standard practice…we’re probably just hearing about it for the first time.
The death (execution) of No Name.
bUt dA DeLtA...uRmAgUr
Wow! Amazing! https://www.dailypress.com/government/nation/vp-nw-supreme-court-justices-home-security-20220519-qhldohdrmnf63klkldtgvqq45a-story.html
DURHAM
Anyone know if beefed up security is standard practice when controversial decisions are about to be announced?
Not ever that I can remember. Especially at their homes.
We now have weaponized Dems, who have their Brown Shirts on speed dial.