'ANOTHER' mass extinction event...... Q is implying this isn't the 1st time...... and I doubt it's the 2nd
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (98)
sorted by:
That's not a good way of thinking at all.
We're all trying to figure things out in a very crazy and deceptive world. To say that someone with one answer that you dont agree with therefore has no points worth considering is very close minded.
To come to the conclusion of a flat Earth is so illogical in about every way would be to ignore dozens of major key points that are easily observable, while also burdening every pilot or sailor that has ever lived in the entire planet's history with being part of a conspiracy to hide it.
That lack of logic being so far from being sound, it does in fact discredit any other conclusion that person could make. Every conclusion they make is tainted, because it has been disproved every day.
Give me a break. Airplanes always fly level unless ascending or descending. They never account for a curvature of the earth because there isn't one. Do you people hate God our creator that much that you stubbornly turn a blind eye to truth? Do you enjoy being deceived? I don't.
The deception is clear. However, “flat Earth” may actually be “snowglobe Earth” or “fishbowl Earth” with a semispherical dome over a bowl or slightly convex surface (because it is just one spot on an actually much larger sphere. We don’t have all the truth yet and bad guys taking advantage of that to destroy people questioning them with “flat Earth” psyop, IMO.
Once we get the truth on real distance to the moon, their lies will start to crumble. The people doing the new moon mission certainly don’t like being questioned about “apparent inadequate fuel to get to moon and back” (based on NASA distance numbers).
You are correct and the evidence is insurmountable against a spinning globe. The true psyop is NASA and the spinning globe.
Sea level and as water is always level blows the curve out of the water. No pun.
Also all aircraft or air"planes" fly level unless they are ascending or descending. They never compensate for a curve.
You are correct that there is a firmament above aka, a dome. Noah's ark and the subsequent flooding of the Earth by God makes more sense now with a flat Earth model. It just doesn't work with a spinning globe.
The bible never depicts a spinning globe. It says it's a circle but we know that. Below note the word "breadth" which means side to side.
1611 KJV Revelation 20:9 [9]And they went vp on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the campe of the Saints about, and the beloued citie: and fire came downe from God out of heauen, and deuoured them.
Operation Fishbowl...
It can also be used as a cover, so that real intelligence can be disseminated with less interference. If you call yourself a flat earther, you can spill the beans on the Rothschild clan without being killed.
Never mind the falsity that Flat Earth is disproved every day...well, actually, for the sake of argument let's say it is...
I think it's very possible that some of the things widely believed on this forum could turn out to not be true (at least one of these beliefs I am convinced is not true). That doesnt mean that everything here doesnt deserve some looking into.
The video I linked isnt even 10% about Flat Earth. It's mostly about the energy grid and the video creator does an amazing job piecing everything together.
How is flat earth disproved every day?
I think you misspelled NASA.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/pZOEuvHvC8rZ/
I didnt say it is, actually I at least halfway believe in it. I mean if forced to choose between Flat Earth/dome and Ball Earth/space, I'd choose the former.
I do now see how the way I worded that first sentence made it seem like I was calling Flat Earth a falsity. I meant that FE being disproved daily (as previous commenter claimed) was actually false. Neither is absolutely proven imo.
I agree on NASA being bullshit btw.
What really gets me, in addition to their pictures of Earth looking way different throughout the years, is the so-called photo of Earth taken from the moon. Earth is supposed to be like 50x-100x bigger than the moon yet in that picture it only looks like 5x bigger than the moon we see in the sky. Maybe that's due to some maths that I dont understand but as of right now I just think that stands out as horseshit.
No, i've researched flat earth theories and they are all a joke.
If I see something with the InfoWars label on it, I ignore it. That's a good way of thinking.
I agree that AJ is an NWO puppet but I believe that's their plan: for him to be so over the top and idiotic and wishy-washy that it discredits him when speaking about things that actually are true.