If Trump says he’s running in 2024 that implies that he’s conceded 2022 which he hasn’t. So he and the whole “gang” have to dance around the subject without demoralizing the base.
Perhaps post midterms red wave, legislation can be enacted that WILL allow Trump to be reinstated once decertification occurs. Kash did say there were no mechanisms in place right now, that doesn't mean there won't be once MAGA takes back the house and senate. Imo :)
It’s worth listening to Kash’s response if you haven’t. He didn’t equivocate for a second. Clearly he was ready for the question. What that means? I don’t know.
Maybe. But I didn't get the same as you all from that interview. I'd have to go listen again, but it seemed like he was doing a bit of dancing to avoid being direct about it. My recollection was that he said something like "it depended on the outcome of the 2022 elections." Or something to that effect. With the implication being that the new Congress could make something happen.
I'm not going to judge the cuisine before it is served. But I do have my reservations as to how much difference it'll make switching faces of the uniparty in Congress, presuming it happens.
Yeah, but what else is he going to say? If there is a plan to install Trump sooner, he certainly can't be out there hinting about it, right?!!
The media would latch on and say trump is trying to stage a Coup.
Bingo. You took this thread to its logical and clearest conclusion.
If Trump says he’s running in 2024 that implies that he’s conceded 2022 which he hasn’t. So he and the whole “gang” have to dance around the subject without demoralizing the base.
Potus did return a “time to circle back” post.
Perhaps post midterms red wave, legislation can be enacted that WILL allow Trump to be reinstated once decertification occurs. Kash did say there were no mechanisms in place right now, that doesn't mean there won't be once MAGA takes back the house and senate. Imo :)
Yeah well both it says demoralizing the base like saying 2024! Depressing as hell! I stopped listening to Kash at that point.
It’s worth listening to Kash’s response if you haven’t. He didn’t equivocate for a second. Clearly he was ready for the question. What that means? I don’t know.
Dave X could have given Kash the questions in advance.
Maybe. But I didn't get the same as you all from that interview. I'd have to go listen again, but it seemed like he was doing a bit of dancing to avoid being direct about it. My recollection was that he said something like "it depended on the outcome of the 2022 elections." Or something to that effect. With the implication being that the new Congress could make something happen.
I'm not going to judge the cuisine before it is served. But I do have my reservations as to how much difference it'll make switching faces of the uniparty in Congress, presuming it happens.
Well, but, we don’t explicitly know that putting him back in before 2024 is part of the plan, do we?
Couldn’t (for example) the plan be to have him win a legit election that is secured by (again, for example) the military?
And I haven’t seen anyone say yet that Devolution must be “completed” by 2024.
For all we know the plan involves the Dems cheating yet again and getting caught OVERTLY by the military in real time, right in front of the world.
I thought this was already the case with Lindell's Pcaps.