When hearing about Sussman, just remember...
✅ - TRUTH - ✅
Sun Tsu's Art of War
Step 1 - Engage target in a battle that doesnt matter
Step 2 - Loose battle but only just.
Step 3 - Enemy believes they are winning (We are here)
Step 4 - Begin Endgame of the real battle and win
It's logical, but not for the purpose of giving the DS a false sense of security. It's logical because the purpose was for Durham to legally introduce evidence into record that can be used for other indictments. It also shows the world that DC is too corrupt to hold uncorrupted trials.
Remember, RICO laws were first used against the mob, who also bribed judges and jurors. Durham has experience with convicting mobsters. He would have expected this outcome.
I’m not sure how the “now they can use the evidence elsewhere trope” started. The fact that evidence was admitted at one trial doesn’t mean it would be admitted at another - that’s not how the rules of evidence work. There’s also no reason why you wouldn’t just introduce the evidence you wanted in the trial you wanted - there is no rule that it has to have been previously admitted in another proceeding.
The mob was brought down by turning the members against one another - hard to do with an acquittal as he’s lost all leverage over Sussman.
Sussmann getting off this hook only puts others on the hook. His acquittal, in effect does point the finger at someone else. The fact remains- fraudulent evidence was received and used by the FBI.
If Sussmann was not working for Hillary, or anyone at all, as he claims, then it has to mean that someone else has to come up with a reason for why the fake evidence was created, and either accept sole responsibility for creating it, or point the finger at someone else who "made them do it."
Respectfully, I disagree fren. No one else has to come up with a reason for anything - the burden rests solely on the Government to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, no one has to prove their evidence.
And, legally speaking, the trial didn’t prove that the FBI received fraudulent evidence. All it proved is that there is a reasonable doubt that Sussman criminally lied to the FBI.
The trial proves the FBI was in possession of fabricated evidence, and used it. It had to come from somewhere. That means Durham will have to ask someone else, under oath.
Mook turned on Clinton, and that was pretty unexpected
I do. People who don't know wtf about much misinterpreting Q post about (paraphrasing) "how do you introduce evidence".
That's how.
This is the correct take, because this is how the legal system works. I expect lots of demoralization psyops as well.
It’s not showing anyone anything that they didn’t already know. Anyone paying attention to this trial knows DC is a corrupt shithole. Normies have no idea this trial even existed.
Only the economy going to shit will get normies to care. Their main priority is entertainment.
Yeah I'm not even sure what the point of these trials are. It's unlikely anything productive will come from them. If the military is the only way why are we even bothering paying attention to this? If the military is the only way we might as well just tune out and wait until the economy collapses.
Yeah I might check out until the economy collapses. Normies care about entertainment more then their own children. Why the hell should I expect these people to ever wake up when half of them STILL WEAR MASKS.
Solid