I know quite a bit about the general area, the people involved with the show, and some of the history of the property.
The strange happenings allegedly go back to a curse between the Utes and Navajo. This is just a guess on my part, but probably most of what is "strange" about this area relates to this dark medicine.
There is nothing particularly odd about Skinwalker with respect to cattle mutilations, UFOs, or other phenomena compared with other areas in the west. Is it a little more common in the Uintah region? Perhaps, but the ranch is not a hotspot by any stretch of the imagination.
The ranch was purchased with government funds at one point. It's my belief that much of the most sensational stuff about Skinwalker was fraudulent lies, in an effort to jack up the price of the property.
The people as part of the show, and the producers, are pretty much all grifters. The show sensationalizes the most trivial things, and concocts others where there is no evidence whatsoever of anything supernatural.
The only program somewhat worthwhile on the History Channel is The Curse of Oak Island, but after watching this show for several seasons, I'm about done with all the stalling, and people crawling around on their hands and knees with a trowel and whisk broom. They've invested FAR more money into digging up the Money Pit with bore holes and cans, than they would have if they just did the "Big Dig" as has been discussed since the late 1960s. As a matter of fact, the bore holes and cans have probably destroyed much of the treasure...if it exists.
This show is so cringe. I watched season 1. Then started season 2. Ten minutes into episode 1, I just turned it off. That dragon guy just bugs the F out of me. Such a douche.
I don't even have respect for the physicist guy. You can tell he's only there for a paycheck.
I do like ancient aliens. If you look past the true believers, there are some questions that do need answering by the archaeologist community. One of those is, if this site is over 10k years old, how did prehistoric man move a 100 ton block of stone? Don't tell me, show me how they did it.
I've been following Skinwalker for 15 years or more. The whole NIDS thing with Robert Bigelow is fascinating. No real data came out of it though... that we know of.
I had a Navajo friend that spent a lot of time at his grandparents on the reservation. The things he has told me about skinwalkers and his personal experience kept me up at night. No thank you. Demonic beings that I want no part of.
I agree, and think we need to keep investigating the natives, gold, and these mountain ranges. the Sioux thought the Black Hills were sacred land/some type of portal. and if you draw a line between Skinwalker and Mt. Rushmore, it's over the mountains/lots of gold in area. and Mt. R. is on the survial guide to the future edition of George Magazine, so the area is obviously important to Q's movie.
My impression is it is the same kind of type up bullshit television as Searching for Bigfoot.
For the record I'm not saying there aren't strange happenings there, or for that matter that Bigfoot doesn't exist. I'm just saying its hyped up TV bullshit with nothing of value to ever show you.
I haven't seen that one yet. I did see a Joe Rogan podcast with Robert Bigelow about a year ago that was interesting. He sold Skinwalker Ranch in 2016. They also cover the tic tacs, which were getting popular around then.
What does a reality show have to do with the Great Awakening? That seems like a discussion more suited to a site like reddit. Course I wouldn't know about either one because I haven't turned a TEEVEE on in years and I don't use reddit.
I just watched this past weeks episode. That was some wild shit! What the heck is that dome over the triangle? And those telescopes that aren’t connected to any network losing all astronomical way points where there were being deleted?
There's no such thing as "gravity". It's just a "theory", and a bad one at that. There is no such "force/particle/field" that has ever been identified, because there's no such thing. Now, we can all agree that "what goes up, must come down". But this is very simple to explain with the already well-known forces of electro-magnetism, di-electric effects, density and buoyancy. The obvious and provable "forces" are really not all that complicated. Gravity is, and will always be unprovable, which naturally upholds the lie indefinitely.
The gravity lie serves many purposes. Roughly 70 years ago, it almost caught up with them when astrophysicists started realizing that they couldn't explain the densities and masses of so-called stars, planets, etc. in relation to gravity. It didn't work mathematically. Fortunately for them (but not for us), a new lie was born to keep the ruse going - "dark matter and dark energy". With that doozy, they could now explain how 95% of the universe was made up of more imaginary stuff in order to uphold their imaginary gravity....brilliant!
And a boatload of "biology", specifically "microbiology" is also completely made up. They've got a ton of things wrong, most prominently, that the "cell" is the basis of life. But sure, they can't lie about things that are obvious and verifiable by most of us, like food gives us energy, lifeforms need water and oxygen, etc.
See the work of biologist Harold Hillman, which is greatly censored and suppressed...of course. Just for starters, he demonstrated that most of the cellular "organelles" you'll find in any anatomy book aren't even real. They can be attributed to water bubbles, artifacts and effects of the metallic staining process in general. He agrees with the nucleus and mitochondria, but says things like the golgi complex, endoplasmic reticulum, ribosomes (ribs of the body), etc. are all 100% made up nothingburgers. And as usual, rather than anybody debate his findings, he just got smeared and of course zero access to government funding.
You'll find in all walks of life, we've basically been taught 20% truth, 40% half-truths and 40% outright lies. It's a magic formula. They figured out long ago that they're able to keep their deceptions alive due to the tiny percentage of truths embedded in their lies. And the most important "truths" are the things that are quite obvious to the majority of us.
A great example is any modern medical anatomy textbook. Each chapter spends about 20% of the text discussing "gross anatomy" which is plainly obvious to anybody who cares to look at a body. The next 40% is a mixture of gross and fine anatomy stealthily blended together which is kind of a mix of obvious stuff with not-so-obvious stuff. And then when you get down to the "fine anatomy", it's a free-for-all. They can never explain how they know all the things they say they know at this level. There are no videos of course, and at best grainy pictures of dead, static tissue (which is Hillman's primary criticism). Basically, they're not looking at anything that's "alive" as they have to kill the cell to see it under the electron microscope. So how they think they can explain all these intricate details of the body's life processes strains credulity at best, because nobody has ever actually SEEN it happening. So it's a safe bet that they just made up a ton of it, much like the cell's organelles and their wildly intricate "functions".
So the majority of people think; "well they're not lying about this, that and the other thing, so what makes you think they're lying about all the rest?". And true to form, this stance stifles curiosity and deeper dives into their claims 99% of the time. People are so preoccupied with earning a living and being entertained, very few feel like they have time to take in anything beyond a sound-byte.
They lie to us about things that are fundamental to our understanding of reality that we can't easily verify for ourselves. Ultimately this strategy keeps "them" in a position of power as the masses fumble and stumble about, awash in ignorance arguing over the mountain of lies they've fed us.
The previous commenter is quite right. They're lying to us about everything in major ways. There's no major institution or major field of study that's an exception that I've yet to come across.
They all "spread the lie" because they don't realize it's a lie. Such is the nature of things. They believe and trust their teachers, who believed and trusted their teachers, etc., etc.
Blind trust in authority is the root cause. Almost nobody questions things any longer, and if they do, they usually get run out of their profession as "trouble-makers".
Who would doubt that viruses aren't real? That gravity doesn't exist? That cancer kills people? A tiny few by my reckoning.
I know quite a bit about the general area, the people involved with the show, and some of the history of the property.
The only program somewhat worthwhile on the History Channel is The Curse of Oak Island, but after watching this show for several seasons, I'm about done with all the stalling, and people crawling around on their hands and knees with a trowel and whisk broom. They've invested FAR more money into digging up the Money Pit with bore holes and cans, than they would have if they just did the "Big Dig" as has been discussed since the late 1960s. As a matter of fact, the bore holes and cans have probably destroyed much of the treasure...if it exists.
This show is so cringe. I watched season 1. Then started season 2. Ten minutes into episode 1, I just turned it off. That dragon guy just bugs the F out of me. Such a douche.
I don't even have respect for the physicist guy. You can tell he's only there for a paycheck.
I do like ancient aliens. If you look past the true believers, there are some questions that do need answering by the archaeologist community. One of those is, if this site is over 10k years old, how did prehistoric man move a 100 ton block of stone? Don't tell me, show me how they did it.
I watch but can't help thinking the owner of the ranch is a bad guy. Has masonic member all over his face. But that is just me.
I've been following Skinwalker for 15 years or more. The whole NIDS thing with Robert Bigelow is fascinating. No real data came out of it though... that we know of.
I read about the ranch a number of years ago, maybe when he owned it. I also find it fascinating.
At least for TV, they are doing scientific studies to see what is going on, and a lot seems to be!
I also think the Native Americans saw a lot of weird shit and the only way to convey what they saw was their pictographs and such.
I had a Navajo friend that spent a lot of time at his grandparents on the reservation. The things he has told me about skinwalkers and his personal experience kept me up at night. No thank you. Demonic beings that I want no part of.
I agree, and think we need to keep investigating the natives, gold, and these mountain ranges. the Sioux thought the Black Hills were sacred land/some type of portal. and if you draw a line between Skinwalker and Mt. Rushmore, it's over the mountains/lots of gold in area. and Mt. R. is on the survial guide to the future edition of George Magazine, so the area is obviously important to Q's movie.
I saw my first episode a day or two back.
My impression is it is the same kind of type up bullshit television as Searching for Bigfoot.
For the record I'm not saying there aren't strange happenings there, or for that matter that Bigfoot doesn't exist. I'm just saying its hyped up TV bullshit with nothing of value to ever show you.
Yes, been watching since the beginning. I love the show.
I couldn't agree more...
I haven't seen that one yet. I did see a Joe Rogan podcast with Robert Bigelow about a year ago that was interesting. He sold Skinwalker Ranch in 2016. They also cover the tic tacs, which were getting popular around then.
https://open.spotify.com/episode/4K3Q51lzzIjUNEsEz1qqXE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtT_iHMEt1A
What does a reality show have to do with the Great Awakening? That seems like a discussion more suited to a site like reddit. Course I wouldn't know about either one because I haven't turned a TEEVEE on in years and I don't use reddit.
It is a show about unusual aerial activities and if you research Skinwalker Ranch at all, the government did experiments and such there.
Q did mention ‘sky event’ and answered the question of if aliens are real. I figured if Q discussed it, the subject would be alright to discuss.
I watched it a lot,before I canceled my cable. Some weird stuff going on for sure.
Skinwalker Ranch has a long history prior to a TV show.
New episode on the 7th
I just watched this past weeks episode. That was some wild shit! What the heck is that dome over the triangle? And those telescopes that aren’t connected to any network losing all astronomical way points where there were being deleted?
Gravity seems pretty real. I was taught that. Biology is real. Learned that.
Not according to modern science and politicians.
Yeah! We can't even define a woman anymore without multiple sessions of Congress to debate it.
There's no such thing as "gravity". It's just a "theory", and a bad one at that. There is no such "force/particle/field" that has ever been identified, because there's no such thing. Now, we can all agree that "what goes up, must come down". But this is very simple to explain with the already well-known forces of electro-magnetism, di-electric effects, density and buoyancy. The obvious and provable "forces" are really not all that complicated. Gravity is, and will always be unprovable, which naturally upholds the lie indefinitely.
The gravity lie serves many purposes. Roughly 70 years ago, it almost caught up with them when astrophysicists started realizing that they couldn't explain the densities and masses of so-called stars, planets, etc. in relation to gravity. It didn't work mathematically. Fortunately for them (but not for us), a new lie was born to keep the ruse going - "dark matter and dark energy". With that doozy, they could now explain how 95% of the universe was made up of more imaginary stuff in order to uphold their imaginary gravity....brilliant!
And a boatload of "biology", specifically "microbiology" is also completely made up. They've got a ton of things wrong, most prominently, that the "cell" is the basis of life. But sure, they can't lie about things that are obvious and verifiable by most of us, like food gives us energy, lifeforms need water and oxygen, etc.
See the work of biologist Harold Hillman, which is greatly censored and suppressed...of course. Just for starters, he demonstrated that most of the cellular "organelles" you'll find in any anatomy book aren't even real. They can be attributed to water bubbles, artifacts and effects of the metallic staining process in general. He agrees with the nucleus and mitochondria, but says things like the golgi complex, endoplasmic reticulum, ribosomes (ribs of the body), etc. are all 100% made up nothingburgers. And as usual, rather than anybody debate his findings, he just got smeared and of course zero access to government funding.
You'll find in all walks of life, we've basically been taught 20% truth, 40% half-truths and 40% outright lies. It's a magic formula. They figured out long ago that they're able to keep their deceptions alive due to the tiny percentage of truths embedded in their lies. And the most important "truths" are the things that are quite obvious to the majority of us.
A great example is any modern medical anatomy textbook. Each chapter spends about 20% of the text discussing "gross anatomy" which is plainly obvious to anybody who cares to look at a body. The next 40% is a mixture of gross and fine anatomy stealthily blended together which is kind of a mix of obvious stuff with not-so-obvious stuff. And then when you get down to the "fine anatomy", it's a free-for-all. They can never explain how they know all the things they say they know at this level. There are no videos of course, and at best grainy pictures of dead, static tissue (which is Hillman's primary criticism). Basically, they're not looking at anything that's "alive" as they have to kill the cell to see it under the electron microscope. So how they think they can explain all these intricate details of the body's life processes strains credulity at best, because nobody has ever actually SEEN it happening. So it's a safe bet that they just made up a ton of it, much like the cell's organelles and their wildly intricate "functions".
So the majority of people think; "well they're not lying about this, that and the other thing, so what makes you think they're lying about all the rest?". And true to form, this stance stifles curiosity and deeper dives into their claims 99% of the time. People are so preoccupied with earning a living and being entertained, very few feel like they have time to take in anything beyond a sound-byte.
They lie to us about things that are fundamental to our understanding of reality that we can't easily verify for ourselves. Ultimately this strategy keeps "them" in a position of power as the masses fumble and stumble about, awash in ignorance arguing over the mountain of lies they've fed us.
The previous commenter is quite right. They're lying to us about everything in major ways. There's no major institution or major field of study that's an exception that I've yet to come across.
So would Christian astrophysicists continue to spread the lie?
They all "spread the lie" because they don't realize it's a lie. Such is the nature of things. They believe and trust their teachers, who believed and trusted their teachers, etc., etc.
Blind trust in authority is the root cause. Almost nobody questions things any longer, and if they do, they usually get run out of their profession as "trouble-makers".
Who would doubt that viruses aren't real? That gravity doesn't exist? That cancer kills people? A tiny few by my reckoning.
My physiology professor said the more we don’t know about a subject the more books are written about it.