BQQM week has begun. What will happen in the coming days with regard to SCOTUS & the Unselect committee?
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 OK, DOOMER! 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
Oh. My. Gosh. Seriously y'all, I'm getting chills. I have huge hopium right now that this truly means something and is not a "coincidence" or a "fake Q," especially when users can't change their handle. Unless they have access through the back of the coding, it can't be changed.
I think there's an excellent chance the TS q /Q is part of the admin at TS. But I don't believe it is the OG Q. They have posted that they aren't "that Q", so they're not trying to impersonate or mislead anyone. The fact that the admin hasn't deleted the account indicates that it's an admin approved account.
Since they've made it clear that people shouldn't mistake them for the original Q, and it brings attention and interest to the site, there doesn't seem to be any reason for them to delete the account.
Just my opinion. 😀
I am pretty sure the @q account was either the first or among the first accounts created and was before the first Apple beta testers were let on
I think so, too.
The account opened before Trump’s
Only two accounts that I know of are older than @Q
@TruthSocial @OAN
That's my opinion too, but it upset some people here apparently.
Yeah, I know. There are a lot of people who really want it to be the real Q. It would be great to hear from Q, but I don't think this is he. There just isn't anything to indicate this is the real Q, other than using "q" as their handle.
How do you choose to define "the real Q"?
Do you imagine Q is a person rather than an operation/team? If so, confusion is understandable.
Your choice. Others choose differently.
Bottom line, as long as those choices don't interfere with WWG1WGA survival, different choices are invigorating.
Conformity obsessives will hopefully take a nap or eat a Snickers and recover quickly.