MSNBC journalist EVISCERATES anti-vaxxers with FLAWLESS logic
(mobile.twitter.com)
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Now look at the death numbers of the vaxxxed, long-tongued lying bitch.
So many hilarious parts to this tweet. Is it satire?
Stupid & pathetic. I feel sorry for them...a little.
This is why people your age don’t get married anymore. They are all retarded, femenists who are doomed to live a life of misery.
Stupidity is now the norm. Go to school, spends hundreds of thousands...all in the pursuit of stupidity. Must be the new major next to gender studies and social equality. They aced it for sure.
And how many unvaxxed are dying of the virus itself? (Not intentional malpractice...)
My dudes.
What are the stats on first time covid deaths on unvaxxed? lol It doesn't matter, the clots, sads, facial paralyzations, infertility, always being sick... you can't run from the consequences of your choices.
Unvaxxed don't need a talking point, the truth is all around.
Is that so? Because according to many studies, the r0 is about 2 - 2.5ish. That means for every one person, they have the likelihood of transmitting it to 2-2.5 ppl on average.
Why is this important? Because you take ONE person with c19 and, from beginning of the incubationperiod to getting better, you have about 2wks, say.
Though it started technically earlier but was underreported by dipsh*t news orgs like yours, let's say it was 2020 sometime in March, during a time when the r0 would have been much higher but I digress. That's almost 120 wks. Say w/ an r0 of 2 and about 2wks total from having c19 to getting better, that's 2 ^ (120/2 - 1) ppl who would have it by now, or 570 quadrillion.
Obviously as ppl's immunities strengthen, the r0 depreciates, so let's look at the reverse scenario. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-52473523 ... According to this 2021 article, it's been 0.7 to 0.9ish under Iockdown in the UK with 280~ ppI/km^2 vs the US where it's 34ish funnily, enough. Say 0.8 and we've all been on Iockdown, essentially, for 2yrs. Using the same math for 0.8 and 104wks respectively, it's 0.8^(104/2 - 1) which is 1.14 e-3% or 1.14 e-5 * 100%. Meaning even if literally every1 in the world had c19 at the same time 104wks ago, then only 79,925 ppI would be without naturaIimmunity to it. That's even assuming it's just as equally retransmissibIe which it clearly is not.
Now then, retard. If it's safe to assume most of us have had it by now outside of "think about muh grammaw from the mountains who's literally been in complete isolation since the early 1900s" then tell me how after reading the numbers how jabmunity stands up to the same naturaIimmunity that has allowed us hominids to survive for 2.9 to 3.9 million yrs in the wilderness with no access to modernheaIthcare.
https://cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e1.htm ...
That brain is so smooth it reflects light.
My intestines are literally piling up around my feet on the floor. How is her wit so wickedly sharp, my dudes?
The idiocy of these people is unbelievable.
Would be interesting to hear her explanation of why the unjabbed are getting the coof abd dying at MUCH lower rates than the jabbed. (Though, it wouldn't be at all surprising if she were to say that the jabbed are protecting the unjabbed from getting it.)
I needed a good laugh...thanks
High level dumbass there.
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhaa they don't understand how they have been conned.
Hilarious. It’s amazing that even with critical thinking skills like this, she still can’t get it right.