You are totally reading into it, and letting your emotions cloud your perception. He NEVER said anything like you say.
He's saying Q did a lot of great stuff, but it doesn't mean everything Q said is 100% right. And he gave Q credit for creating a movement, a movement of valuable people who comprise a very significant component of the Maga movement.
In other words, he totally took the line that allows him plausible deniability. And rightly so.
But regardless of what Q or anyone else writes oir says, if you don't take responsibility for what you choose to believe, you're basically just signing away sovereignty.
Q never said that Trump would be put back into office before 2024. Sometimes I feel as if half of the people here didn’t even read the Q posts. Theories coming from other people hold no weight, and need to stop being considered “well Q said”.
Exactly. People have taken Q drops and built theories and drawn conclusions.
It's understandable, because uncertainty is torture. We have all the Q information, and we want to understand what is going on, and find a way to both explain and also accept certain things.
But ultimately, it's critical to draw the line or border between what Q has dropped on the one hand, and what theories and interpretations have evolved from there on the other. I wouldn't say they have no weight, but they definitely should not be be given the same level of credence that Q's drops are.
Devolution theory is a case in point. It seems to make a lot of sense, but did Q ever use the expression? What about continuity of government? No, and no.
(One of the things that surprised me when I first noticed Patel Patriot and heard his story, was the fact that he apparently expressed never following Q or not being very familiar with Q content.)
When listening to Kash in this clip, it hits rather hard when he says:
What we need to do is to put out what happens, and what needs to happen, and put to bed any conspiracy theories, because that doesn’t work for anyone.
Obviously, if Kash is part of Q or have privileged knowledge about the Q operation, he cannot spill the beans. But also, what if many of us have missed the key points, and are being distracted by theories that are, in fact, inaccurate and distracting?
Any time "plausible deniability" is used by our side, I can only think of the other side which uses "plausible deniability" as a shield against being held to account for all of their crimes.
I assure you that I will always reject "plausible deniability" from anyone on our side on that basis alone.
So, you think that Trump should have just come out and said to everyone "Sure, I'm Q+. We have a highly controlled intelligence operation and its happening now via 8 chan, and yeah, I'm Q+. Washington Post, do you have any questions on that?"
Plausible deniability is a strategy, and is neutral. Like being deliberately vague. And, as neutral, it can be used for either good, or for evil.
I definitely don't think Kash should be going on podcasts saying that we have to do the heavy lifting when we are told several things from "you are watching a movie" to being pacified on the daily because of a plan that has not only not come to fruition on the second year of this, but with an increasing amount of distrust and disdain for our fellow countrymen and women.
The fact that more and more people are expecting a civil war to start is not a good sign. It means that both sides don't see any bridge to this gap, and the gap is widening further every day.
The question is this, in all realistic avenues:
How many people have to die from the pressures of vaccination as a requirement to work?
How many kids?
The conversation and polling continues to drift towards mandatory and forced vaccinations, and it is not doing this for no reason.
How many people have to go broke and lose their homes or livelihoods? How many people have to struggle to make ends meet just to buy a gallon of gas to drive to work every day, or put food on the table because everything from produce to meat to even fast food bullshit continues to rapidly rise.
How many FFLs have to be revoked and stores closed down for things as small as a single fixable typo?
How many people have to be denied guns indirectly by the federal government slow walking their background checks etc. while they wait for more gun control legislation?
How many elections need to be stolen?
How many RINOs need to stab us in the back at totally predictable high impact times?
There are so many factors at play that make this a shit place to live right now.
If nothing can stop what is coming, if we are watching a movie, our participation is not needed.
If our participation is needed, then we could have handled it as a country without being pacified, and something can stop what is coming.
It is tiring watching every loss we suffer or every negative we see being handwaved away as "playing a role", "watching a movie", "disinformation is necessary", "the ending won't be for everyone".
The entire country is suffering to varying degrees, and letting it continue will cease to have any intended effect as public would hate them for allowing this to happen.
It is a fine line to allow someone to be jaded enough to hate something, but not jaded so much as to hate everything. We as a country are trending towards the latter, and that's not good.
So TL;DR: If you're not going to come out and say Q is real and that there is a plan, stop going on to podcasts and devaluing the sentiment unless we were all played.
Um, you shoulda put the TLDR at the beginning, not at the end. Because, if it was really TLDR, no one gets to where you are.
Anyway, yeah, I dunno. I don't think your sentiments are particularly unreasonable. But also, I don't run my life based on what DJT or Kash or Q or Fred Jones says. I take the information in, I accept that I will likely never see the whole picture, I choose what I should be doing based on the information that comes to me and my own personal evaluation of it.
Might work at chasing down the whole interview, tho. I've been listening to a bunch of Kash interviews recently, and I'm pretty happy with what I hear.
You are totally reading into it, and letting your emotions cloud your perception. He NEVER said anything like you say.
He's saying Q did a lot of great stuff, but it doesn't mean everything Q said is 100% right. And he gave Q credit for creating a movement, a movement of valuable people who comprise a very significant component of the Maga movement.
In other words, he totally took the line that allows him plausible deniability. And rightly so.
But regardless of what Q or anyone else writes oir says, if you don't take responsibility for what you choose to believe, you're basically just signing away sovereignty.
Is he going to cry about Trump playing off the Q accusations from that one demon next? kek
Q never said that Trump would be put back into office before 2024. Sometimes I feel as if half of the people here didn’t even read the Q posts. Theories coming from other people hold no weight, and need to stop being considered “well Q said”.
Exactly. People have taken Q drops and built theories and drawn conclusions.
It's understandable, because uncertainty is torture. We have all the Q information, and we want to understand what is going on, and find a way to both explain and also accept certain things.
But ultimately, it's critical to draw the line or border between what Q has dropped on the one hand, and what theories and interpretations have evolved from there on the other. I wouldn't say they have no weight, but they definitely should not be be given the same level of credence that Q's drops are.
Devolution theory is a case in point. It seems to make a lot of sense, but did Q ever use the expression? What about continuity of government? No, and no.
(One of the things that surprised me when I first noticed Patel Patriot and heard his story, was the fact that he apparently expressed never following Q or not being very familiar with Q content.)
When listening to Kash in this clip, it hits rather hard when he says:
What we need to do is to put out what happens, and what needs to happen, and put to bed any conspiracy theories, because that doesn’t work for anyone.
Obviously, if Kash is part of Q or have privileged knowledge about the Q operation, he cannot spill the beans. But also, what if many of us have missed the key points, and are being distracted by theories that are, in fact, inaccurate and distracting?
Any time "plausible deniability" is used by our side, I can only think of the other side which uses "plausible deniability" as a shield against being held to account for all of their crimes.
I assure you that I will always reject "plausible deniability" from anyone on our side on that basis alone.
Your choice.
So, you think that Trump should have just come out and said to everyone "Sure, I'm Q+. We have a highly controlled intelligence operation and its happening now via 8 chan, and yeah, I'm Q+. Washington Post, do you have any questions on that?"
Plausible deniability is a strategy, and is neutral. Like being deliberately vague. And, as neutral, it can be used for either good, or for evil.
In my view.
I definitely don't think Kash should be going on podcasts saying that we have to do the heavy lifting when we are told several things from "you are watching a movie" to being pacified on the daily because of a plan that has not only not come to fruition on the second year of this, but with an increasing amount of distrust and disdain for our fellow countrymen and women.
The fact that more and more people are expecting a civil war to start is not a good sign. It means that both sides don't see any bridge to this gap, and the gap is widening further every day.
The question is this, in all realistic avenues:
How many people have to die from the pressures of vaccination as a requirement to work?
How many kids?
The conversation and polling continues to drift towards mandatory and forced vaccinations, and it is not doing this for no reason.
How many people have to go broke and lose their homes or livelihoods? How many people have to struggle to make ends meet just to buy a gallon of gas to drive to work every day, or put food on the table because everything from produce to meat to even fast food bullshit continues to rapidly rise.
How many FFLs have to be revoked and stores closed down for things as small as a single fixable typo?
How many people have to be denied guns indirectly by the federal government slow walking their background checks etc. while they wait for more gun control legislation?
How many elections need to be stolen?
How many RINOs need to stab us in the back at totally predictable high impact times?
There are so many factors at play that make this a shit place to live right now.
If nothing can stop what is coming, if we are watching a movie, our participation is not needed.
If our participation is needed, then we could have handled it as a country without being pacified, and something can stop what is coming.
It is tiring watching every loss we suffer or every negative we see being handwaved away as "playing a role", "watching a movie", "disinformation is necessary", "the ending won't be for everyone".
The entire country is suffering to varying degrees, and letting it continue will cease to have any intended effect as public would hate them for allowing this to happen.
It is a fine line to allow someone to be jaded enough to hate something, but not jaded so much as to hate everything. We as a country are trending towards the latter, and that's not good.
So TL;DR: If you're not going to come out and say Q is real and that there is a plan, stop going on to podcasts and devaluing the sentiment unless we were all played.
My theory on the Truth Social Q and Kash is that they are using “Q” to capture an audience and sell a book.
ROFL.
Um, you shoulda put the TLDR at the beginning, not at the end. Because, if it was really TLDR, no one gets to where you are.
Anyway, yeah, I dunno. I don't think your sentiments are particularly unreasonable. But also, I don't run my life based on what DJT or Kash or Q or Fred Jones says. I take the information in, I accept that I will likely never see the whole picture, I choose what I should be doing based on the information that comes to me and my own personal evaluation of it.
Might work at chasing down the whole interview, tho. I've been listening to a bunch of Kash interviews recently, and I'm pretty happy with what I hear.
NO POLLING is drifting to mandatory vaccines.
UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
In response to how many people?
Look no further than the Great Depression. Those people suffered.
You are most where near that.