Excuse me for not being able to connect the dots here, but your statement “Watkins is 100% guilty” does not comport with the option “• It could be Q.” I understand the concept that Watkins has the ability to spoof on his site, but what specifically is Watkins 100% guilty of and why do we know this to be fact?
I think he is saying that if we assume that the new Q (the one without tripcodes, and with zero-delta) is the real Q and we believe him when he said "Locked out by Watkins" and believe that to be 100% true, then even the 0 delta would be questionable because Watkins could have done it by spoofing the times.
However Anons have confirmed here that the watched it as it dropped. So I believe the 0 Delta is real.
Ahh, I didn’t notice the absence of the tripcode. So if it were true that Q’s passcode had been whitelisted, and thus not changed, would that mean the original tripcode would also be intact; thus there would be no reason for, and thus no Q post without the original tripcode?
I think they mean, if it really is Q, the 2nd post captured by OP says "locked out by Watkins," presumably meaning Watkins locked Q out so that Q could not use the trip code.
Excuse me for not being able to connect the dots here, but your statement “Watkins is 100% guilty” does not comport with the option “• It could be Q.” I understand the concept that Watkins has the ability to spoof on his site, but what specifically is Watkins 100% guilty of and why do we know this to be fact?
I think he is saying that if we assume that the new Q (the one without tripcodes, and with zero-delta) is the real Q and we believe him when he said "Locked out by Watkins" and believe that to be 100% true, then even the 0 delta would be questionable because Watkins could have done it by spoofing the times.
However Anons have confirmed here that the watched it as it dropped. So I believe the 0 Delta is real.
Ahh, I didn’t notice the absence of the tripcode. So if it were true that Q’s passcode had been whitelisted, and thus not changed, would that mean the original tripcode would also be intact; thus there would be no reason for, and thus no Q post without the original tripcode?
I must be misunderstanding, I read these posts as Q putting the time Trump was going to post to the second in the post not in the time Q posted?
Noob learning about this Q stuff here
You picked a helluva rime to join lol no-one knows wtf is going on at this point.
I think they mean, if it really is Q, the 2nd post captured by OP says "locked out by Watkins," presumably meaning Watkins locked Q out so that Q could not use the trip code.
Lock out caused by Watkins shutting down TOR, which Watkins talked about in his 8Kun message?
Where / how did Q post that he's locked out by Watkins?
Read the OP ffs..
I did. It doesn't say where that post was made.