If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (253)
sorted by:
"This is a play to divide the anons".
And you are playing your part.
Btw the phrase is anons. The term " the anons" is NEVER used by actual anons.
👌👊
My take is the term “the anons” imply a someone from outside the anon community.
I dont think Dragon was playing a role in dividing, whatsoever, neither am I, or really anyone much from this discussion.
We can have differing opinions on our caution level of returning Q posts as we see what time tells, and still be united overall. Why be rude
I said ploy, not play. Also, pointing out it is a ploy does not make it less true, even if it does seem to make me a de facto participant. However my aim is not to divide but to unite, and calmly discussing differences of opinions does just that. Should I just stay silent so as to not "rock the boat"?. I believe this movement is mature enough to withstand healthy debates.
I dont think your comment was divisive. And IF there was trickery going on, any Q posing, actually it prob would be a ploy to divide and cause trouble.
Don't let some suspicious and judgmentall woman who likes to attack the anons bother you.
SHE is the one who is divisive.
Usually, people refer to anons with no article.
But a comment and a commenter don't become "divisive" FFS, just because of placing the article "the" before anons. What complete nonsense.
Cf. "the white hats," "the patriots", the Republicans, etc.
/werdnerd
Why bother with arguing? You’re better off cataloguing all u/usernames attacking you without reasonable discourse in a notepad.
Amen anon
touche