Couldnt figure out how to link it but ive copied the text:
"Anonymous 06/29/22 (Wed) 23:22:16043133 (1) No.16562259 >>16562315
File (hide): 64196502336c1ec⋯.png (189.71 KB, 443x380, 443:380, ClipboardImage.png) (h) (u)
File (hide): 6932dbf3d14d31a⋯.png (74.95 KB, 792x521, 792:521, ClipboardImage.png) (h) (u)
Kentaji Brown Jackson is the plant!
This is probably bullshit but I'm gonna throw this spaghetti to the wall and see if it sticks.
WHAT IF!….This justice, Kentaji Brown Jackson, is the plant Q is talking about?
Q's drop last night mentioned," Can emotions be used to influence decisions?
How do you control emotion?"
Last night's drop also said, "Define 'Plant'.
How do you insert a plant?
Can emotions be used to insert a plant?"
We all know this judge's leniency on pedophiles. Her inability to define a woman. Democrats love that, Republicans hate it; so she was confirmed. Emotions were riled up to an extreme on both sides. Leftists were DEMANDING she be confirmed.
How else could a non-compromised supreme court judge be confirmed during the Biden "presidency"?
Q's drop last night also said, "Who was surprised?
Who will be surprised?
Use your logic"
Wouldn't it be surprising if this judge was put on the supreme court, and she suddenly began voting with the conservative judges?
Q's drop last night said, "What is at stake?
Who has control?
SURPRISE WITNESS."
Q asked us to define 'plant'. Instead I'm going to define 'witness'. There's many definitions but here's one that's interdasting; "(of a person) openly profess one's religious faith.
"our duty is to witness to God""
Perhaps "SURPRISE WITNESS" refers to THIS definition of witness. SHE is the plant! Say what you want about her past rulings, but she IS Christian. She believes in God. She was raised Christian.
"5 Faith Facts About Ketanji Brown Jackson, The Supreme Court's First Black Woman"
SAUCE: https://religionunplugged.com/news/2022/04/08/ketanji-brown-jackson-scotus-baptists-disney-ukraine"
Yes we shall see Don't forget, Pelosi claims to be a Christian as well
Ha, true. Good point 👉😎👉
If this theory is true then Kentaji Brown Jackson deserves an award for her acting because she's 100% convincing playing the role of a functionally illiterate woman who couldn't find Russia on the map.
That doesn't really make sense though, does it?
No.
Hell no.
She has been consistently anti-Trump in her previous decisions:
https://www.theindianalawyer.com/articles/notable-opinions-by-high-court-nominee-ketanji-brown-jackson
She's a vegetable, not a plant.
Ketanji Brown Jackson is not a plant. It only takes two words to understand why.
The two words are Paul Ryan.
I guess we will see...
Yeah but when is the soonest she can even participate on rulings? Those cases and opinions may not begin to be released until a year or more from now. Perhaps I'm wrong but I remember one of the Trump appointments could not participate on ongoing rulings at the time. Only now 2+ years later we're finally seeing their effect on the court.
So if this is the case why would Q telegraph and expose their own hidden operator that can't strike for months or years? And it's not beyond the deep state to zap a supreme court justice with a heart attack gun should they pose a threat to them...
Her “judicial temperament” is far left. That’s evident over many years. Wouldn’t matter if she was bribed or blackmailed, she’s never going to be able to write opinion that veers off her ingrained views.
Besides, that “Q drop” smells fake.
Biden's seeming lack of any sort of agency makes it plausible.
The thing is it really doesn't connect much, if any, to the Q post IMO. It also doesn't really shift the court that much as any time Roberts can be brought into line the court is dominantly conservative, and there seems to be plenty of dirt on Robert.
Maybe the most critical question: in what ways is Jackson different from Breyer?
There's a lot of June 30 posts lining up tomorrow. Maybe it will be more clear then.
Kentaji Brown Jackson may not be involved in Supreme Court cases until next judicial term begins... UNLESS the Supreme Court decides to hold a special review of the 2020 theft fraud.
She may be the plant that insists on the review of the election, and rules that Biden won by FRAUD. Or she could insist on the court hearing all of the election fraud evidence televised live.
The name has several meanings, such as “home”, “pure gold” and “dwelling.”
Hmmmm?
If the name didn't have those meanings I would discredit it entirely
Also LAST NAME JACKSON which Trump idolizes Andrew Jackson
And the implications of Brown v. Board of Education also come to mind