Call me crazy, but I thought it was known they were developed using human cell tissue. And that was one of the reasons people were giving warly for religious exemptions.
The kidney cells were from a baby, born alive and then had its kidneys removed (while alive) and then left to die. 100% sick organ harvesting from an after birth abortion.
In August, the University of Pittsburgh effectively made a horrifying admission. The Center for Medical Progress, which had to enlist the help of Judicial Watch before the university would respond to its Freedom of Information Act request, explained that the school’s GUDMAP program (full name: GenitoUrinary Development Molecular Anatomy Project), with the help of area Planned Parenthood abortion providers, was “allowing babies, some of the age of viability, to be delivered alive, and then killing them by cutting their kidneys out.”
Everyone reading this article should surely agree that once a baby is delivered alive, killing it should no longer be considered an abortion. Killing a delivered-alive baby is textbook infanticide.
Pitt’s researchers and Planned Parenthood had to resort to this gruesome butchery because it is the best and likely the only way to harvest certain usable body parts, particularly kidneys. Harvesting viable kidneys requires continuous blood flow, which in turn requires a beating heart, which in turn requires that the baby be alive (or at the very least almost always) outside the womb when the kidneys are removed.
The HEK293 line was created in the early 1970s. Months before the University of Pittsburgh’s admissions, AnnaMaria Cardinalli, an extraordinarily perceptive and conscientious writer, detailed the damning truth about its origins at Crisis Magazine in January:
… To harvest a viable embryonic kidney … sufficiently healthy children old enough to have adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive, typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must take place without anesthesia for the child, which would lessen the viability of the organs.
… The deliberate killing of an unwanted child (a little girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in the tortuous manner it did precisely to obtain her organs for research. The harvest of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to which, she was a living child, outside the womb.
In email correspondence, Ms. Cardinalli indicated, based on her own discussions with medical experts and “the test of reason,” that in her view, “we are genuinely speaking of clear infanticide, not abortion.” In her article, she also indicated that she fears that “Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict may not have had this information when they received the vaccines.”
In the decades since HEK293’s creation, its two most directly involved scientists, Drs. Alex van der Eb and Franklin Graham, have been vague in explaining the cell line’s origins.
Can you imagine the seared conscience of the "scientists" who did this? Cutting open a living baby with no anesthesia to harvest her organs? There is a special place in hell for them.
Having had a kidney removed for renal cell carcinoma 13 years ago, I can tell you that the recovery from this surgery is extremely painful. It is one of the most painful procedures post-op. I couldn't get enough morphine from the pump! Woke up from anesthesia literally saying, "PAIN... PAIN..." I cannot imagine a precious baby having this procedure done with no anesthesia. They need to cut through 4 layers of muscle to reach the kidney, and usually remove one of the floating ribs in the process.
In order to successfully harvest the cells/kidneys, the baby had to be 100% alive and all systems working (heart pumping, etc). It was generally known to be from an abortion, but only people who knew about the 'hows' with the procedure knew the extreme brutality of it.
I mean I’m fortunate in that they option was there, I’d love to say it was the only reason I left but that mandate was optional for that company to embrace and it was their entire woke culture that led to that final decision. We had just had a kid and I’m not gonna lie it immediately made them a threat to my family and the minute they said vax or leave that was it.
I’ll be modifying my religious exemption request to include objection to fetal line research cells. I assumed such things came from already dead, aborted embryos. Ignorance is bliss.
I had no idea they were murdering viable babies, outside the womb, to harvest organs for research.
It doesn't. It is just used to muddy the waters to make people that are looking for a moral/ethical way to justify it to themselves.
Just like the "clump of cells" argument they use. Point out that everything is essentially a clump of cells, including them and they will - without fail - agree and nod their head knowingly before moving on to their next argument. They know it is BS, but they will use whatever excuse/reason they can to justify what they want.
Politico lied I their article. I knew I had read that fetal cells were used in the development of the Covid shot. ClarenceThomas was absolutely correct. He was not simply “quoting” those who brought the suit against employers in New York. He was quoting fact.
Call me crazy, but I thought it was known they were developed using human cell tissue. And that was one of the reasons people were giving warly for religious exemptions.
Supposedly it was lab grown cells that date as far back as the 70s when the actual harvested human cells were obtained.
The kidney cells were from a baby, born alive and then had its kidneys removed (while alive) and then left to die. 100% sick organ harvesting from an after birth abortion.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/exclusive-pfizers-nervousness-covid-vaccines-origins-conceals-horror-story/
In August, the University of Pittsburgh effectively made a horrifying admission. The Center for Medical Progress, which had to enlist the help of Judicial Watch before the university would respond to its Freedom of Information Act request, explained that the school’s GUDMAP program (full name: GenitoUrinary Development Molecular Anatomy Project), with the help of area Planned Parenthood abortion providers, was “allowing babies, some of the age of viability, to be delivered alive, and then killing them by cutting their kidneys out.”
Everyone reading this article should surely agree that once a baby is delivered alive, killing it should no longer be considered an abortion. Killing a delivered-alive baby is textbook infanticide.
Pitt’s researchers and Planned Parenthood had to resort to this gruesome butchery because it is the best and likely the only way to harvest certain usable body parts, particularly kidneys. Harvesting viable kidneys requires continuous blood flow, which in turn requires a beating heart, which in turn requires that the baby be alive (or at the very least almost always) outside the womb when the kidneys are removed.
The HEK293 line was created in the early 1970s. Months before the University of Pittsburgh’s admissions, AnnaMaria Cardinalli, an extraordinarily perceptive and conscientious writer, detailed the damning truth about its origins at Crisis Magazine in January:
… To harvest a viable embryonic kidney … sufficiently healthy children old enough to have adequately-developed kidneys must be removed from the womb, alive, typically by cesarean section, and have their kidneys cut out. This must take place without anesthesia for the child, which would lessen the viability of the organs.
… The deliberate killing of an unwanted child (a little girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in the tortuous manner it did precisely to obtain her organs for research. The harvest of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to which, she was a living child, outside the womb.
In email correspondence, Ms. Cardinalli indicated, based on her own discussions with medical experts and “the test of reason,” that in her view, “we are genuinely speaking of clear infanticide, not abortion.” In her article, she also indicated that she fears that “Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict may not have had this information when they received the vaccines.”
In the decades since HEK293’s creation, its two most directly involved scientists, Drs. Alex van der Eb and Franklin Graham, have been vague in explaining the cell line’s origins.
Can you imagine the seared conscience of the "scientists" who did this? Cutting open a living baby with no anesthesia to harvest her organs? There is a special place in hell for them.
Having had a kidney removed for renal cell carcinoma 13 years ago, I can tell you that the recovery from this surgery is extremely painful. It is one of the most painful procedures post-op. I couldn't get enough morphine from the pump! Woke up from anesthesia literally saying, "PAIN... PAIN..." I cannot imagine a precious baby having this procedure done with no anesthesia. They need to cut through 4 layers of muscle to reach the kidney, and usually remove one of the floating ribs in the process.
I came to say exactly this. It’s called a cold lab procedure.
Oh man, I thought it was from an abortion (Still basically just as bad), rather than a post birth organ harvesting.
How could they get away with that 🤬
In order to successfully harvest the cells/kidneys, the baby had to be 100% alive and all systems working (heart pumping, etc). It was generally known to be from an abortion, but only people who knew about the 'hows' with the procedure knew the extreme brutality of it.
I knew about it too.
Im proud that I forced a religious exemption down my employers throat
And then left 2 months later
That’s even better lmao
I mean I’m fortunate in that they option was there, I’d love to say it was the only reason I left but that mandate was optional for that company to embrace and it was their entire woke culture that led to that final decision. We had just had a kid and I’m not gonna lie it immediately made them a threat to my family and the minute they said vax or leave that was it.
Lol. I did the same thing too.
I’ll be modifying my religious exemption request to include objection to fetal line research cells. I assumed such things came from already dead, aborted embryos. Ignorance is bliss.
I had no idea they were murdering viable babies, outside the womb, to harvest organs for research.
We use fresh, never frozen babies for our vaccines
Yeah, what the hell does that distinction matter? 😡
It doesn't. It is just used to muddy the waters to make people that are looking for a moral/ethical way to justify it to themselves.
Just like the "clump of cells" argument they use. Point out that everything is essentially a clump of cells, including them and they will - without fail - agree and nod their head knowingly before moving on to their next argument. They know it is BS, but they will use whatever excuse/reason they can to justify what they want.
Politico lied I their article. I knew I had read that fetal cells were used in the development of the Covid shot. ClarenceThomas was absolutely correct. He was not simply “quoting” those who brought the suit against employers in New York. He was quoting fact.
Makes me more resolved to never get their “vaccines”