I bought the Babylonian Talmud and read what was in it for myself. I was shocked at what I found and yes they condone child sacrifice in that book. That book is the source and people need to read it for themselves. I dare anyone who has not read it to debate with me that it’s just a crazy made up conspiracy theory.
You're missing the point in the text. One is only liable to get stoned if they did a certain set of actions in sacrificing to Molech.
That doesn't mean that one is permitted to worship Molech and get off on a technicality. If they ended up killing the child, then the penalty would be decapitation, which is considered a lesser form of punishment than stoning. The harsher sentence of stoning is only applied if they did all the actions associated with Molech.
MISHNA: And these are the transgressors who are killed by decapitation in the implementation of the court-imposed death penalty: The murderer; and the residents of an idolatrous city, all of whom engaged in idol worship. The mishna elaborates: In the case of a murderer who struck another with a stone or with iron, or held him in the water or in the fire, and the victim could not extricate himself from there and he died, the murderer is liable to be executed.
While researching English translations of the Talmud online, we aware than many of fine-print disclaimers that are usually worded as "Some passages have not been translated for reasons of unity".
This always means the most horrific passages about child rape, Christian genocide, using usury to enslave the entire human race, etc. have been purged.
When you research why you can't find any of the most horrific passages, you'll be told there are two Talmuds and all the bad stuff is in the "bad" Talmud.
Interesting, I think until I can be better educated overall I’ll wait to make any overall judgement.
I also suspect that the discussion of giving the child to molech, while they might not be penalized for that law, they’d still be penalized for idolatry or murder. Unsure overall.
My question is why are you defending something you don’t know anything about. What is the real motive ? I’m a Jew by blood, but I have turned to Yeshuah for my spiritual needs. Even I can tell you the Talmud is filled with racial and barbaric texts.
Because I demand evidence, I get hate? Well feel free to question my motives. I defended nothing. I refuse to accept extraordinary claims without some evidence, and I apologize for nothing.
I’ll look into it, I’m skeptical but I’ll do my homework. Jews do love their casuistry.
I bought the Babylonian Talmud and read what was in it for myself. I was shocked at what I found and yes they condone child sacrifice in that book. That book is the source and people need to read it for themselves. I dare anyone who has not read it to debate with me that it’s just a crazy made up conspiracy theory.
everyone nose 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I know right 😂😂😂
funny you mentioned crypto..
and Jewish front.
Freemasonry is Kabbalah for the Goy. The jesuits are simply kabbalistic Christians.
You seem to know alot about this stuff.
You should know then that to be correct it is the Khazarian Mafia as opposed to the "Jooooooooooooooos REEEEEEEE !!"
How far do the bloodlines go? Where are their lines crossed? It will be biblical is not just a phrase.
No wonder Jesus was so mad at them.
obfuscate with their verbage, typical slimy satanists
You're missing the point in the text. One is only liable to get stoned if they did a certain set of actions in sacrificing to Molech.
That doesn't mean that one is permitted to worship Molech and get off on a technicality. If they ended up killing the child, then the penalty would be decapitation, which is considered a lesser form of punishment than stoning. The harsher sentence of stoning is only applied if they did all the actions associated with Molech.
12 pages later on Sanhendrin 76b (https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.76b.9?lang=bi&with=Navigation&lang2=en):
While researching English translations of the Talmud online, we aware than many of fine-print disclaimers that are usually worded as "Some passages have not been translated for reasons of unity".
This always means the most horrific passages about child rape, Christian genocide, using usury to enslave the entire human race, etc. have been purged.
When you research why you can't find any of the most horrific passages, you'll be told there are two Talmuds and all the bad stuff is in the "bad" Talmud.
Lies within lies within lies.
What are your thoughts on this explanation?
http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/three.html
Interesting, I think until I can be better educated overall I’ll wait to make any overall judgement.
I also suspect that the discussion of giving the child to molech, while they might not be penalized for that law, they’d still be penalized for idolatry or murder. Unsure overall.
Lmao it's from the Talmud and you got owned.
I got owned for not believing something hard to believe without a source? Sure.
My question is why are you defending something you don’t know anything about. What is the real motive ? I’m a Jew by blood, but I have turned to Yeshuah for my spiritual needs. Even I can tell you the Talmud is filled with racial and barbaric texts.
Because I demand evidence, I get hate? Well feel free to question my motives. I defended nothing. I refuse to accept extraordinary claims without some evidence, and I apologize for nothing.
Autobots tend to auto defend anything they were told "shall not be criticized" by their Talmudic overlords constitution in the education system