Shit pedes...Get in here!!!! The Q Confirmation we have been Lđź‘€king for?
(media.greatawakening.win)
C O N F I R M A T I O N
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (153)
sorted by:
Some people have said the board is comp'd, and the real Q isn't back, but nothing I've seen convinces me they are right. Wording is slightly different? After a year and a half, that's hardly cause for concern. So is Q back? - I think it's likely. Am I 100% convinced? No, more like 99%. Of all the times for a comp'd Q post to show up, why on Roe v Wade? R v W goes to the heart of the original Q posts.
Either way, you are absolutely right. The left is in a panic. As it should be. Let the bastards squirm.
BTW, I'm not suggesting the board's integrity is 100%. Far from it. That doesn't mean the real Q couldn't show up, and if the account hasn't been reset, restart and verify the comms.
Qs early posts are totally different in vernacular to the main Q we know, hence why they think at some point Ron Watkins got involved but who knows.
Throughout the years, it seems that 1 of the Q team was the main poster, HOWEVER, there were posts that were from Q team different people. It was easy to tell. I'm not really bothered by the different tones in writing styles because this is not new.
Be careful of who you follow but also be careful of the deep state/cabal sending in posters who want us confused and fighting amongst each other - divided we're weak and united we're strong.
Exactly. It's a team. There are clearly 2-3 different "voices" that come through if you know how to determine that.
Yep - if anyone has been following Q for a long time or if they've read the team's posts multiple times, I think it's easier to tell. Many people believe Q is 1 person but that's not so.
From November 2, 2017:
402: "You can count the people who have the full picture on two hands."
403: "Of those (less than 10 people) only three are non-military."
I wonder about this^ a lot.
which person actually types the Q drops? or maybe it's a group document, checking each other's work.
Don't know about checking each other's work but they would agree on what is posted, IMO.
Read Q's last drop from the bottom up.. It makes a difference..
Doesn't read exactly the same, but certainly more in line with what I'm used to,
đź‘Ť decernment is good..
If q was comped then the messaging would be inciting violence to get the narrative they need that we are “terrorists” or whatever.
Good point. We know what the enemy wants to do - they are pushing their poisons every way possible. War is the ultimate poison when there's no reason for war.