Isn't it interesting how all these amazing structures, all with similar designs, all over the planet, were supposedly erected in the mid-late 1800s by people who barely had the tools and the skills to make simple dwellings?
It's the most obvious in Australia. At that time there were very few convicts there who had any sort of skills, and yet these world-class cathedrals and government buildings were all built there within a span of 50 years.
On an excursion in 2006, I found a solid porcelain glazed hand of a statue buried in the side of a creek bed in Forest Park, St. Louis, the site of the WF 1904. There is nothing temporary about it. Most of the buildings that were "built for the purpose of the fair" only to be destroyed, were buried within the boundaries of the massive park. The Ferris Wheel axle has yet to be found. I believe these buildings existed way before 1904 and the Expos were a way to fool the gen pop. Jon Levi is excellent at explaining it all. The StL Art Museum still exists and it is a stunning fixture on a huge hill. There is no way people with horse and cart transported massive slabs of granite through muddy roads. Trains, perhaps? But not wagons as we are led to believe.
Yes it's very interesting and intriguing. The main falicy I've witnessed is many conversations getting sidelined by either mentioning tartaria or mud floods. Stay away from both, and just concentrate on the architecture, population density at the claimed time of building and the tools available or not available at the time. Something definitely doesn't add up, but I can't tell you exactly what that is yet. It's interesting how the same style buildings are found literally in every country and in countries that clearly have their own building style that doesn't resemble the Greco-Roman style found everywhere. The Chicago world fair of 1893 had electric... and several major engineering feats that cannot be explained if commissioned to be built in only 2 years... particularly the water features, and absolutely massive buildings. Same with world fair in Philly. All done with horse and buggy? There's just no way, and no way it was done in the timeframe mentioned. In addition to this, just coming off a civil war, where did all the money come from, AND, who in their right mind would have thought it was a good idea to hemorage money for buildings that are only temporary? Again, something doesn't quite add up... and there's plenty more mysteries, like orphan trains and incubator babies... where did THEY come from? Lots of questions... not many answers.
You can't tell me people in horse and buggy on dirt roads built these elaborate buildings. They were simply inheritors after a great reset. History as we've been told is a lie. Not too surprising considering the movie we're living through now. Jon Levi on YouTube does some really good research on our false history looking at old buildings and unexplainable
" natural " structures.
Mud flood makes no sense. These no way there wouldn’t be any kind of surviving account or crummy old photographs of such a catastrophe as recent as the 1800’s, even if they tried to wipe the record books clean.
Older civilizations were definitely buried by something. It's evident by some of our buildings today and plenty of underground cities have been discovered including my in my home town. Wasn't aware of Formenko. Who are they?
Taiwan was a fishing community until the Kuo Min Tang moved there to escape Mao's communism. The KMT were supported by the USA, because their views were seen as moderate, until the USA decided to change their minds and support Mao instead, because he was winning. That's when they had to run.
My point is that this happened in the early part of the 20th century. However, the building is hearkening to neo-classicism, which was still popular in that era.
...Yes? Why can't they be? It's an ancient style of architecture known throughout all of the world. Expert masons built them and are worldwide, why is that so unfathomable?
Isn't it interesting how all these amazing structures, all with similar designs, all over the planet, were supposedly erected in the mid-late 1800s by people who barely had the tools and the skills to make simple dwellings?
It's the most obvious in Australia. At that time there were very few convicts there who had any sort of skills, and yet these world-class cathedrals and government buildings were all built there within a span of 50 years.
If this sort of thing interests you, check out the Tartarian Truthers channel on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/c/TartarianTruthers
Edit: Having read through the rest of your comments here, I see that you are already well versed in this topic, lol!
Yes! And then try to fathom their explanations for tearing most of them down not long after.
On an excursion in 2006, I found a solid porcelain glazed hand of a statue buried in the side of a creek bed in Forest Park, St. Louis, the site of the WF 1904. There is nothing temporary about it. Most of the buildings that were "built for the purpose of the fair" only to be destroyed, were buried within the boundaries of the massive park. The Ferris Wheel axle has yet to be found. I believe these buildings existed way before 1904 and the Expos were a way to fool the gen pop. Jon Levi is excellent at explaining it all. The StL Art Museum still exists and it is a stunning fixture on a huge hill. There is no way people with horse and cart transported massive slabs of granite through muddy roads. Trains, perhaps? But not wagons as we are led to believe.
Yes it's very interesting and intriguing. The main falicy I've witnessed is many conversations getting sidelined by either mentioning tartaria or mud floods. Stay away from both, and just concentrate on the architecture, population density at the claimed time of building and the tools available or not available at the time. Something definitely doesn't add up, but I can't tell you exactly what that is yet. It's interesting how the same style buildings are found literally in every country and in countries that clearly have their own building style that doesn't resemble the Greco-Roman style found everywhere. The Chicago world fair of 1893 had electric... and several major engineering feats that cannot be explained if commissioned to be built in only 2 years... particularly the water features, and absolutely massive buildings. Same with world fair in Philly. All done with horse and buggy? There's just no way, and no way it was done in the timeframe mentioned. In addition to this, just coming off a civil war, where did all the money come from, AND, who in their right mind would have thought it was a good idea to hemorage money for buildings that are only temporary? Again, something doesn't quite add up... and there's plenty more mysteries, like orphan trains and incubator babies... where did THEY come from? Lots of questions... not many answers.
You can't tell me people in horse and buggy on dirt roads built these elaborate buildings. They were simply inheritors after a great reset. History as we've been told is a lie. Not too surprising considering the movie we're living through now. Jon Levi on YouTube does some really good research on our false history looking at old buildings and unexplainable " natural " structures.
Fomenko has it all completely figured out and doesn't need to advocate a strange mud flood to justify it
Link me brotha? Would love to hear a different theory than “mud flood”. Lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_chronology_(Fomenko)
I assume this is who he was referencing?
Mud flood makes no sense. These no way there wouldn’t be any kind of surviving account or crummy old photographs of such a catastrophe as recent as the 1800’s, even if they tried to wipe the record books clean.
Older civilizations were definitely buried by something. It's evident by some of our buildings today and plenty of underground cities have been discovered including my in my home town. Wasn't aware of Formenko. Who are they?
Taiwan was a fishing community until the Kuo Min Tang moved there to escape Mao's communism. The KMT were supported by the USA, because their views were seen as moderate, until the USA decided to change their minds and support Mao instead, because he was winning. That's when they had to run.
My point is that this happened in the early part of the 20th century. However, the building is hearkening to neo-classicism, which was still popular in that era.
Why do you say that? This is an old style of architecture, based on Greek and Classic models. It certainly could have been built in the 19th Century.
...Yes? Why can't they be? It's an ancient style of architecture known throughout all of the world. Expert masons built them and are worldwide, why is that so unfathomable?