Twitter’s bot check sample size was only 100 users, Musk reveals
What this means, of course, is that Twitter, along with the rest of Big Tech, is little more than a social engineering tool to manipulate and brainwash the masses into believing the scripted reality that psychopaths are using to maintain control.
Exactly. This wont kill twitter because ad revenue will dry up. This will kill twitter because people will find out coporate America isnt paying for ads. They are paying for our brainwashing.....The advertisers are not being tricked. This is what they want.
As soon as they made the movie I knew the entire narrative around the founding and history of Facebook was total bullshit.
Great film BTW, but it's complete historical fiction. And of course the farm always hand picks their marks (pun intended) out of the ivy league wasp breeding grounds. Just like Gates and Microsoft 30 years prior.
i think youtube started off as an independent company and then went to shit after being bought by google. they should be bankrupt after all the ztupid shit khazar ceo susan wajjikki does.
Just to clarify.. when you say : "Twotters bot check sample size was only 100." you are talking about their published number of less than 5% bots...when in reality, according to Musk, the actual bot percentage was at least 8-tines their published number and perhaps as high as eighteen times...
Just to clarify.... I didn't say anything about the bot sample size,
but I read Elon's comment where he was concerned about twitter's sample size, which they used when Elon made his claims,
twitter's response was to select 100 accounts (out of the supposed millions) which were then analysed, this is not a statistically valid size so results are worthless.
Ah "Bot-check sample" that is what i was getting at.. I agree 100 users is an insignificant sample and that doesn't even touch the non-objectivity of the twaddle people doing the so called statistical analysis..
Twitter’s bot check sample size was only 100 users, Musk reveals What this means, of course, is that Twitter, along with the rest of Big Tech, is little more than a social engineering tool to manipulate and brainwash the masses into believing the scripted reality that psychopaths are using to maintain control.
Winner winner fake meat chicken dinner
Finger licking ficken
“I’m too drunk to taste this chicken!”
The product is YOU.
Exactly. This wont kill twitter because ad revenue will dry up. This will kill twitter because people will find out coporate America isnt paying for ads. They are paying for our brainwashing.....The advertisers are not being tricked. This is what they want.
As soon as they made the movie I knew the entire narrative around the founding and history of Facebook was total bullshit.
Great film BTW, but it's complete historical fiction. And of course the farm always hand picks their marks (pun intended) out of the ivy league wasp breeding grounds. Just like Gates and Microsoft 30 years prior.
i think youtube started off as an independent company and then went to shit after being bought by google. they should be bankrupt after all the ztupid shit khazar ceo susan wajjikki does.
YouTube can at least turn you on to more music.
Putting this here on ur coat tails so it's easy to find for all.
Homeland Security on Bots
https://files.catbox.moe/oqnc1b.png
https://files.catbox.moe/7k74al.png
I'll leave this here https://greatawakening.win/p/15IqsmfGjK/should-elon-buy-tiktok-next-can-/
Just to clarify.. when you say : "Twotters bot check sample size was only 100." you are talking about their published number of less than 5% bots...when in reality, according to Musk, the actual bot percentage was at least 8-tines their published number and perhaps as high as eighteen times...
Just to clarify.... I didn't say anything about the bot sample size,
but I read Elon's comment where he was concerned about twitter's sample size, which they used when Elon made his claims,
twitter's response was to select 100 accounts (out of the supposed millions) which were then analysed, this is not a statistically valid size so results are worthless.
Ah "Bot-check sample" that is what i was getting at.. I agree 100 users is an insignificant sample and that doesn't even touch the non-objectivity of the twaddle people doing the so called statistical analysis..