A HUGE win for free speech
(stevekirsch.substack.com)
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Not to be that person, but I am: "two state attorney generals is a big deal", unless the writer is a Brit, that would be ATTORNEYS GENERAL.
Hey thanks for being “that guy”. I learned something new.
Thank you for your service.
"Attorney Generals" - probably some future U.S. president, in some bad movie, someday...
In the British Armed Forces, the plural is sergeant majors and not sergeants major as it is in the United States. [wiki]
We both use Attorneys General :)
YW!
And thanks for being that guy so I wouldn't have to, LOL
But isn't "attorney general" together describing one subject, of which there are two (attorney general x 2 = 2 attorney generals)? This would be a good trick question on the ole grammar quiz.
You singularize and pluralize well!
KEK
Okay, I'll take a shot at this. I think it is attorneys general because the attorneys function in some general form. Could be wrong, but that makes sense to me
LawProse Lesson #262: The plural of “attorney general.”
What’s the plural of attorney general? The answer is attorneys general, not *attorney generals. (The asterisk signifies an always-erroneous form.)
A one-time alleged editor of the Harvard Law Review totally failed this easy test.
I think it's actually General Disarray.
KEK. You are correct.
Great news! Thanks for posting. Definitely didn't see this anywhere else.
Someone tell whoever is doing discovery to see if there is an internal pfizer portal at the sued companies and if said company received $500 million paid by pfizer which might explain the censorship push. There's also slides talking about how there's a potential to increase revenue in future deals. (Saw some incriminating stuff before leaving one of the sued companies)
I can't help but feel this is like getting the Publishers Clearinghouse envelope with you MAY have won $10 million... There's no actual HUGE win here... only possibility. It's sad we're taking a victory lap during qualifying...
I'm getting tired of these tickles and slaps brought on by clickbait too.
Impeach this babbling piece of shit.
Industrial shredders go brrrr...
A lot of companies have a digital equivalent of a shredder which is that all comms such as chat are auto-deleted after 1 month and all emails sent/received are auto-deleted after 1 year. However, this is suspended if you are sued and placed on litigation hold. So, to the lawyers suing, you need to put people on litigation hold ASAP. You may need to request all chats to be placed on litigation hold separately as I have never seen internal messaging chats get placed on litigation hold.
Good to know, but I'm still skeptical! Tyvm for the info!