I mean, say what you will about the left. When they are in power, the know how to fucking use it.
Then look at these faggot republicans who when they subpΕna information from Maricopa county they basically resist at every fucking turn and then republicans just tweet or write a mean letter, when they could have thrown them in jail for obstruction.... yet we don't.
Oh or they hold a vote that basically means nothing, except to placate people who they believe are their constituents.
We aren't going to win against these people giving them shit and trying to meet them halfway, that shit isn't going to work, because when they are in power, they take all and they want you dead... period, if you can't see it at this point, I really don't know what else you are waiting for.
Bannon's show is my go-to when I want to get normie-type quality information and perspective. Him and revolver, and the other paper/magazine are the one's doing real journalism in America today, in terms of the general normie world out there.
The way I see the layout of things is this. There is a broad spectrum of levels of awareness that the normie population exists within. Some are closer to the point of waking, some further from waking. Some deeply entranced in the Matrix (metaphor) and some on the cusp of waking up and seeing the matrix for what it is.
Then, there is also a spectrum of those beyond the breaking point of waking. Anons etc are individually at different levels of awareness and understanding of what is going on. However, what defines us is that we've all crossed that transition point, the point of being redpilled.
Visually, I would use the ocean as a metaphor, with those below the surface as being normies and not yet awake. Some are right down the bottom, where the water pressure is too great for them to even begin to see the surface. Awake folks, which now includes a wider spectrum of people that just anons, are above the surface of the water. but some are close the surface, and others have a 40,000 ft view, etc.
Another way to think of it is to flip the analogy. The normie world is above the water, and looking down, they only see the surface. Anons and the population of the Great Awakening are people that can freely act below the surface, being able to see and look at everything under the surface (behind the scenes, as it were).
The former analogy describes awakening, the latter - a different analogy - describes perception of what is going on.
For a normie to move from 50% awake to 70% awake to 90% awake and then to being red-pilled and waking up (aka breaking through the water surface, in that analogy), there are a lot of processes and factors involved. One of those is the sort of information that flows back and forth on the surface of things, aka normie information. Like, when Fox news or Tucker talks about x or y issues, which may plant a few seeds or water a few seeds in the mind of a normie who at some point goes, "Oh! What??? Oh, dang. Now I see it." at which point they may go on a dive down a rabbit hole, or starting digging or questioning what is going on BEYOND what Tucker is talking about.
Bannon discusses politics and the situation in the US as it functions on the surface, and I find that really helpful, because being too immersed in anon content can problematic at times. Overwhelming, or stimulating of disconnect with all the normies out there who I really need to interact with in order to assist their awakening process.
When you have access to both varieties of information, both vibrations, I see that as a plus, not a minus. Because being awake to anon content (aka Q content, aka Great Awakening content) means I can much more clearly understand and decipher the normie-levels of information that they deal with.
But currently, well, for years now, I really cannot stomach lamestream media and corporate media, with all their commercial and propaganda bulldust. But Bannon's level of content is serious and real. They understand, for example, the evil nature of communism. They talk about action and things regular folks aka normies really should be paying attention to. So I like that.
You do not have to trust somebody to enjoy a show.
For all intends and purposes, Tucker espouses not the big .gov rethoric like Laura Ingraham or the other guy: Sean Hannity.
Tucker by nature is a libertarian conservative leaning classical liberal, often appealing to the independent. I often note how he not asks the questions, and I also note: he takes positions rather unpopular and stingy.
He has a show in journalism. A show. So, business is the first consideration.
However, since I have looked at guys like this for 20 years, I always look at the way they treat Ron Paul. It is quite a good.measure at where people really stand.
Bannon said, I spent eight years as a naval officer and have committed my life to this project and getting it done....makes me feel hopeful
This was the biggest line of the interview for me.
We must all support the Constitution and the Rule of Law!!
lol, while the people in power all take massive shits on it.
You're both right.
I mean, say what you will about the left. When they are in power, the know how to fucking use it.
Then look at these faggot republicans who when they subpΕna information from Maricopa county they basically resist at every fucking turn and then republicans just tweet or write a mean letter, when they could have thrown them in jail for obstruction.... yet we don't.
Oh or they hold a vote that basically means nothing, except to placate people who they believe are their constituents.
We aren't going to win against these people giving them shit and trying to meet them halfway, that shit isn't going to work, because when they are in power, they take all and they want you dead... period, if you can't see it at this point, I really don't know what else you are waiting for.
Nailed it
Not sure about Bannon but Cucker Carlson is controlled opposition! His job is to do anything to take our eyes off the illegitimate election
Is Bannon a WH?
Bannon is one of the biggest brawlers I've ever seen. Yes, he is based as hell. Tune into his WarRoom podcast. It's one of the best.
Bannon's show is my go-to when I want to get normie-type quality information and perspective. Him and revolver, and the other paper/magazine are the one's doing real journalism in America today, in terms of the general normie world out there.
Which we need. Coz not everyone is an anon.
?
Is that a good thing
For normies, yes. And for us.
The way I see the layout of things is this. There is a broad spectrum of levels of awareness that the normie population exists within. Some are closer to the point of waking, some further from waking. Some deeply entranced in the Matrix (metaphor) and some on the cusp of waking up and seeing the matrix for what it is.
Then, there is also a spectrum of those beyond the breaking point of waking. Anons etc are individually at different levels of awareness and understanding of what is going on. However, what defines us is that we've all crossed that transition point, the point of being redpilled.
Visually, I would use the ocean as a metaphor, with those below the surface as being normies and not yet awake. Some are right down the bottom, where the water pressure is too great for them to even begin to see the surface. Awake folks, which now includes a wider spectrum of people that just anons, are above the surface of the water. but some are close the surface, and others have a 40,000 ft view, etc.
Another way to think of it is to flip the analogy. The normie world is above the water, and looking down, they only see the surface. Anons and the population of the Great Awakening are people that can freely act below the surface, being able to see and look at everything under the surface (behind the scenes, as it were).
The former analogy describes awakening, the latter - a different analogy - describes perception of what is going on.
For a normie to move from 50% awake to 70% awake to 90% awake and then to being red-pilled and waking up (aka breaking through the water surface, in that analogy), there are a lot of processes and factors involved. One of those is the sort of information that flows back and forth on the surface of things, aka normie information. Like, when Fox news or Tucker talks about x or y issues, which may plant a few seeds or water a few seeds in the mind of a normie who at some point goes, "Oh! What??? Oh, dang. Now I see it." at which point they may go on a dive down a rabbit hole, or starting digging or questioning what is going on BEYOND what Tucker is talking about.
Bannon discusses politics and the situation in the US as it functions on the surface, and I find that really helpful, because being too immersed in anon content can problematic at times. Overwhelming, or stimulating of disconnect with all the normies out there who I really need to interact with in order to assist their awakening process.
When you have access to both varieties of information, both vibrations, I see that as a plus, not a minus. Because being awake to anon content (aka Q content, aka Great Awakening content) means I can much more clearly understand and decipher the normie-levels of information that they deal with.
But currently, well, for years now, I really cannot stomach lamestream media and corporate media, with all their commercial and propaganda bulldust. But Bannon's level of content is serious and real. They understand, for example, the evil nature of communism. They talk about action and things regular folks aka normies really should be paying attention to. So I like that.
Good stuff anon
See graphic:
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IrKrEBcs/those-normies-will-never-wake-up/c/
Thanks will definitely check it out!
https://warroom.org/
You do not have to trust somebody to enjoy a show.
For all intends and purposes, Tucker espouses not the big .gov rethoric like Laura Ingraham or the other guy: Sean Hannity.
Tucker by nature is a libertarian conservative leaning classical liberal, often appealing to the independent. I often note how he not asks the questions, and I also note: he takes positions rather unpopular and stingy.
He has a show in journalism. A show. So, business is the first consideration.
However, since I have looked at guys like this for 20 years, I always look at the way they treat Ron Paul. It is quite a good.measure at where people really stand.
So far, he is ok.
I dunno, I saw a lot of emotion from Tucker on this one. Seems to me he was pretty incensed.
This is China 1967 IRL. Only difference is itβs in America.
The Communist Russian Gulags come to mind too.
The White Mandela??