She's a liar. She ran as an Uber conservative and then just voted for amnesty as her first act as a rep. That's not integrity, or "Love for God". That is straight up deception.
Then, when confronted about her vote, she did the typical politician walk away while her goons run interference. Not a good start
She hoodwinked MAGA and betrayed America. Fuck that bitch!
Whenever a new President is sworn in, the Intelligence Branch takes him to a secure room and shows him a never-before-seen angle of the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
Maybe so. Then she can't claim she believes God will protect her. She just proved she is more fearful of "the Man" than she is God. You either have Faith or you don't. If you don't, don't lie and say you do. Don't try to act like this is a God-sanctioned move by invoking His Name.
I saw the video when the guy was asking her why she vote the way she did (she didn’t respond, of course) and the faggot simps were harassing him and told him that he had to leave the building.
Keep an eye on her, for sure. She may have been a (R)INO plant, not that it really matters, since we have learned that the uniparty exists.
Amen! Our Triune God is not a doctrine for religious people to squabble over. He is triune for out experience and enjoyment. The Father is the source, the Son is the embodiment and expression of the source, and the Spirit is the flowing out of God in Christ to reach you and me. "The grace of Christ, the love of God, and the fellowship if the Holy Spirit be with you all! iiCorinthians 13:14
I dont know what you mean. I did not say they were not co-equal. Romans 8:9-11 show plainly that the Spirit of God, the Spirit of Christ, Christ, and the Spirit of the one who raised Jesus from the dead are in us believers. The Triune God is in us. And, "violate"? Since we are trying to understand the Scriptures regarding God, whould'nt "misunderstand" be a better word?
Not many politicians can say that. God bless her. We need to return to a nation under God - the nation under satan experiment has been a dismal failure.
God is one, not three. If we were to make a case for a multiple Godhood that would have to extend to all of his creations.
Maya Flores is a RINO, and I forget the actual passage but there is a part in the Bible that specifies that false believers will shout their belief from the rooftops for personal ego reasons. To benefit themselves and be adored.
God doesn't suffer from multiple personality disorder. The only reference to the Trinity was added to the Bible in 1520. Jesus is referred to as "the firstborn of all creation" and Paul warned people to not worship the creation when they should worship the Creator.
Trinitarianism is rooted in Greek polytheism and should be handily rejected by Christians who are "awake."
Lol, I can read the Koinic Greek and some of the Hebrew. And I'm the thirteenth great grand nephew of the person most responsible for the KJV, which means I'm exceedingly familiar with his work.
Feel free to research the Complutensian Polyglot when you get the chance... and don't be scared to pick up an interlinear Bible. Hahaha.
It's actually the First Lie that gets exposed once you begin studying how the Bible was written and transmitted throughout the ages.
Check out the Tetragrammaton... and ask yourself why it was edited out of the Old Testament (there was an agenda, but also Jerome couldn't read Hebrew when he translated the Vulgate.)
Thankfully, the Tetragrammaton was preserved in the earliest Septuagint fragments that survive (in paleo Hebrew no less, within the Nahal Hever fragments.) You won't know what any of this means, but if you decide to delve into it, you'll be amazed.
Particularly in light of John 17, but these days you'd have to know the Greek to know that "sua ton onoma" has been replaced in most translations.
Or you can tell yourself that someone who can rattle off this sort of Biblical knowledge, must surely be wrong about the Trinity... because that's more comfortable to process, lol.
Here's what the writers of the KJV thought of the Septuagint and Jerome's Latin Vulgate, as told in the foreword of the KJV itself.
Neither did we run over the work with that posting haste that the Septuagint did, if that be true which is reported of them, that they finished it in seventy-two days ; neither were we barred or hindered from going over it again, having once done it, like St. Jerome--if that be true which himself reporteth, that he could no sooner write anything but presently it was caught from him and published, and he could not have leave to mend it --; neither, to be short, were we the first that fell in hand with translating the Scripture into English, and consequently destitute of former helps, as it is written of Origen, that he was the first in a manner that put his hand to write commentaries upon the Scriptures, and therefore no marvel, if he overshot himself many times.
You really don't have any experience with historiography. My gosh man, take an ancient history class or something.
The writers are saying, "our version is the best because we took our time" but if you applied any critical thinking to it, you'd know they were 16 centuries removed from the Septuagint and not much less removed from the Vulgate - so their aspersions regarding the older creations are mythical at best.
There's a reason why original texts are valued. The oldest extant NT books are from the 4th century AD, but we have Septuagint fragments from within a few decades of Christ's death. Hate to break it to you, but there are changes that occurred between them....
But keep doing your Wiki searches, at some point you might stumble across the truth (it would help if you'd learn Greek of course - I've noticed you have absolutely no answer for that one.)
God the Father created all things, including His Son, Jesus. Jesus came to do not his will on Earth, but his Father's. Jesus didn't preach his name, but his Father's. Jesus made a point to pray to his Father and say, "I have made your name known!"
But since you don't even know the name of the Father, you can't say the same.
And if you aren't following Christ's example to make his Father's name known, how are you a Christian?
So many questions you can't answer! So desperate you are to be misled....
Here we go off in another direction. You got entirely defeated on the Vulgate and Septuagint, and so now you're going to get into the original text mythology. Original text that no one has ever seen. What's next, older is better? If this were a debate you would already be disqualified.
Who is the Comforter, that Jesus Christ asked the Father to send? Or has your apostate Bible erased this?
(there was an agenda, but also Jerome couldn't read Hebrew when he translated the Vulgate.)
The KJV is mostly translated from the Masoretic text. Which were the true texts completed by the Levite scribes around 250BC. And from which Jesus Christ quoted from during His ministry on Earth.
Septuagint along with the Vulgate are works that were compiled by the two apostates Jerome and Origen. Anyone can check this by comparing their works to the KJV and seeing that nothing matches.
has been replaced in most translations.
Any modern Bible is an apostate Bible. All of these works emerged from Egypt, from which God called us out of and told us not to go back into.
As I stated in the beginning, you were created from the dust and the spirit of life was breathed into you, creating your soul. Body, soul and spirit, created as image of a three-part God.
What kind of crack are you smoking? Tyndale used Erasmus' Hebrew and Greek Scriptures. Covington finished his translation, which was then later used as the core of the KJV. There's a reason why Tyndale is said to have had an impact equal to Shakespeare on the English language.
What Wikipedia source are you trying to use? ROFL.
Erasmus is an entirely different discussion then the one we've been having. Now we're talking Textus Receptus. Erasmus didn't touch the alexandrian texts, he used the Syrian texts in this translation. When he started this translation work, he was a professing catholic, by the time he finished he was a professing Protestant.
What is the Vulgate and Septuagint have to do with any of this? Will you be introducing the LXX to the conversation next?
She's a liar. She ran as an Uber conservative and then just voted for amnesty as her first act as a rep. That's not integrity, or "Love for God". That is straight up deception.
Then, when confronted about her vote, she did the typical politician walk away while her goons run interference. Not a good start
She hoodwinked MAGA and betrayed America. Fuck that bitch!
They showed her the blackmail material.
Whenever a new President is sworn in, the Intelligence Branch takes him to a secure room and shows him a never-before-seen angle of the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
"Any questions?"
Maybe so. Then she can't claim she believes God will protect her. She just proved she is more fearful of "the Man" than she is God. You either have Faith or you don't. If you don't, don't lie and say you do. Don't try to act like this is a God-sanctioned move by invoking His Name.
I agree we should catapult this bitch back over the wall
She also thinks illegal immigrants have precedent over natural born citizens. She definitely pulled a rino move.
The irony of it: we can’t give her shit because she’s a minority which would fuel that racist card
I think we’ve all stopped caring when they call us racists, since anything you do can be labeled that way. It’s lost its power.
I saw the video when the guy was asking her why she vote the way she did (she didn’t respond, of course) and the faggot simps were harassing him and told him that he had to leave the building.
Keep an eye on her, for sure. She may have been a (R)INO plant, not that it really matters, since we have learned that the uniparty exists.
she voted for amnesty. she deserves the same paiinful death as the rest of the club.
Amen! Our Triune God is not a doctrine for religious people to squabble over. He is triune for out experience and enjoyment. The Father is the source, the Son is the embodiment and expression of the source, and the Spirit is the flowing out of God in Christ to reach you and me. "The grace of Christ, the love of God, and the fellowship if the Holy Spirit be with you all! iiCorinthians 13:14
I dont know what you mean. I did not say they were not co-equal. Romans 8:9-11 show plainly that the Spirit of God, the Spirit of Christ, Christ, and the Spirit of the one who raised Jesus from the dead are in us believers. The Triune God is in us. And, "violate"? Since we are trying to understand the Scriptures regarding God, whould'nt "misunderstand" be a better word?
Not many politicians can say that. God bless her. We need to return to a nation under God - the nation under satan experiment has been a dismal failure.
Agree!
James 2:19 You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe-and tremble.
She left out amnesty
Somebody goes to the afternoon LifeTeen Mass I see.
And I believe in amnesty
God is one, not three. If we were to make a case for a multiple Godhood that would have to extend to all of his creations.
Maya Flores is a RINO, and I forget the actual passage but there is a part in the Bible that specifies that false believers will shout their belief from the rooftops for personal ego reasons. To benefit themselves and be adored.
Width, depth, height. Space, time, matter. There's much more but I'm in the midst of something right now.
God doesn't suffer from multiple personality disorder. The only reference to the Trinity was added to the Bible in 1520. Jesus is referred to as "the firstborn of all creation" and Paul warned people to not worship the creation when they should worship the Creator.
Trinitarianism is rooted in Greek polytheism and should be handily rejected by Christians who are "awake."
You are body, soul, spirit created in the image of God. The reason you don't know this is because you're reading an apostate Bible, not the KJV.
Lol, I can read the Koinic Greek and some of the Hebrew. And I'm the thirteenth great grand nephew of the person most responsible for the KJV, which means I'm exceedingly familiar with his work.
Feel free to research the Complutensian Polyglot when you get the chance... and don't be scared to pick up an interlinear Bible. Hahaha.
Dude, missing the Trinity is like the very first total failure of Bible interpretation.
It's actually the First Lie that gets exposed once you begin studying how the Bible was written and transmitted throughout the ages.
Check out the Tetragrammaton... and ask yourself why it was edited out of the Old Testament (there was an agenda, but also Jerome couldn't read Hebrew when he translated the Vulgate.)
Thankfully, the Tetragrammaton was preserved in the earliest Septuagint fragments that survive (in paleo Hebrew no less, within the Nahal Hever fragments.) You won't know what any of this means, but if you decide to delve into it, you'll be amazed.
Particularly in light of John 17, but these days you'd have to know the Greek to know that "sua ton onoma" has been replaced in most translations.
Or you can tell yourself that someone who can rattle off this sort of Biblical knowledge, must surely be wrong about the Trinity... because that's more comfortable to process, lol.
Here's what the writers of the KJV thought of the Septuagint and Jerome's Latin Vulgate, as told in the foreword of the KJV itself.
Neither did we run over the work with that posting haste that the Septuagint did, if that be true which is reported of them, that they finished it in seventy-two days ; neither were we barred or hindered from going over it again, having once done it, like St. Jerome--if that be true which himself reporteth, that he could no sooner write anything but presently it was caught from him and published, and he could not have leave to mend it --; neither, to be short, were we the first that fell in hand with translating the Scripture into English, and consequently destitute of former helps, as it is written of Origen, that he was the first in a manner that put his hand to write commentaries upon the Scriptures, and therefore no marvel, if he overshot himself many times.
You really don't have any experience with historiography. My gosh man, take an ancient history class or something.
The writers are saying, "our version is the best because we took our time" but if you applied any critical thinking to it, you'd know they were 16 centuries removed from the Septuagint and not much less removed from the Vulgate - so their aspersions regarding the older creations are mythical at best.
There's a reason why original texts are valued. The oldest extant NT books are from the 4th century AD, but we have Septuagint fragments from within a few decades of Christ's death. Hate to break it to you, but there are changes that occurred between them....
But keep doing your Wiki searches, at some point you might stumble across the truth (it would help if you'd learn Greek of course - I've noticed you have absolutely no answer for that one.)
God the Father created all things, including His Son, Jesus. Jesus came to do not his will on Earth, but his Father's. Jesus didn't preach his name, but his Father's. Jesus made a point to pray to his Father and say, "I have made your name known!"
But since you don't even know the name of the Father, you can't say the same.
And if you aren't following Christ's example to make his Father's name known, how are you a Christian?
So many questions you can't answer! So desperate you are to be misled....
Here we go off in another direction. You got entirely defeated on the Vulgate and Septuagint, and so now you're going to get into the original text mythology. Original text that no one has ever seen. What's next, older is better? If this were a debate you would already be disqualified.
Who is the Comforter, that Jesus Christ asked the Father to send? Or has your apostate Bible erased this?
(there was an agenda, but also Jerome couldn't read Hebrew when he translated the Vulgate.)
The KJV is mostly translated from the Masoretic text. Which were the true texts completed by the Levite scribes around 250BC. And from which Jesus Christ quoted from during His ministry on Earth.
Septuagint along with the Vulgate are works that were compiled by the two apostates Jerome and Origen. Anyone can check this by comparing their works to the KJV and seeing that nothing matches.
has been replaced in most translations.
Any modern Bible is an apostate Bible. All of these works emerged from Egypt, from which God called us out of and told us not to go back into.
As I stated in the beginning, you were created from the dust and the spirit of life was breathed into you, creating your soul. Body, soul and spirit, created as image of a three-part God.
What kind of crack are you smoking? Tyndale used Erasmus' Hebrew and Greek Scriptures. Covington finished his translation, which was then later used as the core of the KJV. There's a reason why Tyndale is said to have had an impact equal to Shakespeare on the English language.
What Wikipedia source are you trying to use? ROFL.
Erasmus is an entirely different discussion then the one we've been having. Now we're talking Textus Receptus. Erasmus didn't touch the alexandrian texts, he used the Syrian texts in this translation. When he started this translation work, he was a professing catholic, by the time he finished he was a professing Protestant.
What is the Vulgate and Septuagint have to do with any of this? Will you be introducing the LXX to the conversation next?
Would you like to learn anything else?