What possible benefit against the DS would such "disinformation" serve. That is for things that matter. FE doesn't fucking matter. Even if true, it literally doesn't in any way change "The Plan," who the real enemy is, that the veil has been pulled over our eyes for millennia about that enemy, that we are stuck in The Matrix, etc.
The only thing I can get from that is Q straight up setting the record straight.
I've always said the video and photography was made in a studio on Earth. If you know how critical the payload on any rocket is, especially when its carrying humans, then you know only the most essential equipment for survival is required. Camera equipment during that time was big, bulky, heavy analog equipment. Not only this it had to be specially tailored to zero-gravity and oxygen-free environment. There's no way camera equipment was on-board the Apollo missions and on the moon. It would be far easier to fake the photography and video. No one would no for the better. I still remember Walter Cronkite narrating the Apollo moon mission and showing the TV viewers these cartoon cinema renderings as he talked.
NASA is the pubic PR face and not our real space program(s). I think statements "Programs exist that are outside of public domain." and "Highest classification. Consider vastness of space." regarding ETs sums it up.
Assuming Q is a truthsayer (of which I have no current reason to doubt, but I am forever suspicious) it is difficult to interpret that any other way.
There is a reason that NASA has done pretty much Jack and Shit since the initial rocket development, and I don't think it's "incompetence" or "government ineffeciency" as commonly suggested. NASA is the smokescreen; The Ministry of Science.
That's not exactly what they said. They were talking about the radiation of the van allen belts. In a world were you need to be super safe about every single thing you do, you care a great deal about these things. In a world that's a little more "frontier", you just do it. The radiation isn't that bad. It's not like sticking your head in a microwave. It's just "beyond safe limits," which change all the time depending on how likely you are to get sued and who's in charge.
Aside from that, I think our real tech is far beyond what they suggest, so it's all smoke and mirrors anyways.
Good point! How could the show a real landing when there is so much on the moon that requires secrecy? Plenty of patriots feel confident that White Hats and inter-galactics are meeting off-planet. Not necessarily on the moon but it would be feasible. It is NASA that is is deep state, not Space Force.
I don't know what to think about that, and I haven't really dug into that overmuch, but it's an awful big universe for little ole' us. There also are some pretty big discrepancies from the data about the moon. And who knows what data is real and what isn't anyways? What a quagmire!
Post 2225
There is a difference between the moon landings being real, and the footage of the moon landings being real.
That's a great Q post, but I like this one even more.
u/#q2622
u/#toldyou
"Disinformation is necessary."
Q
What possible benefit against the DS would such "disinformation" serve. That is for things that matter. FE doesn't fucking matter. Even if true, it literally doesn't in any way change "The Plan," who the real enemy is, that the veil has been pulled over our eyes for millennia about that enemy, that we are stuck in The Matrix, etc.
The only thing I can get from that is Q straight up setting the record straight.
I really wish the question was the other way around. "Q, is the earth a spinning ball flying through space, as we've all been taught in school?"
People love pulling that one out of their ass.
Disinformation is a weapon of war against your enemies. If Q is trying to disinform you he is not your friend.
lol...I know.
But nobody asked about Hollow Earth.
"BIRDS AREN'T REAL"
I wish I could force every flat earth denier to bungee jump off the edge until they scream "it's flat!!!"
What edge? Every flerf I have ever spoken to says there is no edge.
Well, they'll have to get sent to the edge also.
Precisely stated.
I've always said the video and photography was made in a studio on Earth. If you know how critical the payload on any rocket is, especially when its carrying humans, then you know only the most essential equipment for survival is required. Camera equipment during that time was big, bulky, heavy analog equipment. Not only this it had to be specially tailored to zero-gravity and oxygen-free environment. There's no way camera equipment was on-board the Apollo missions and on the moon. It would be far easier to fake the photography and video. No one would no for the better. I still remember Walter Cronkite narrating the Apollo moon mission and showing the TV viewers these cartoon cinema renderings as he talked.
I came here to say this
Thank you. I never understood this idea that 'we went to the moon' and 'NASA is lying' are mutually exclusive things.
Interesting documentary regarding possibly fake moon landings --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIy8ZqqK5G8
NASA is the pubic PR face and not our real space program(s). I think statements "Programs exist that are outside of public domain." and "Highest classification. Consider vastness of space." regarding ETs sums it up.
Assuming Q is a truthsayer (of which I have no current reason to doubt, but I am forever suspicious) it is difficult to interpret that any other way.
There is a reason that NASA has done pretty much Jack and Shit since the initial rocket development, and I don't think it's "incompetence" or "government ineffeciency" as commonly suggested. NASA is the smokescreen; The Ministry of Science.
So Q says "Moon landings are real," while a NASA engineer says "We must solve these challenges before entering this region of space."
Interesting...
That's not exactly what they said. They were talking about the radiation of the van allen belts. In a world were you need to be super safe about every single thing you do, you care a great deal about these things. In a world that's a little more "frontier", you just do it. The radiation isn't that bad. It's not like sticking your head in a microwave. It's just "beyond safe limits," which change all the time depending on how likely you are to get sued and who's in charge.
Aside from that, I think our real tech is far beyond what they suggest, so it's all smoke and mirrors anyways.
Good point! How could the show a real landing when there is so much on the moon that requires secrecy? Plenty of patriots feel confident that White Hats and inter-galactics are meeting off-planet. Not necessarily on the moon but it would be feasible. It is NASA that is is deep state, not Space Force.
I don't know what to think about that, and I haven't really dug into that overmuch, but it's an awful big universe for little ole' us. There also are some pretty big discrepancies from the data about the moon. And who knows what data is real and what isn't anyways? What a quagmire!
Just because there have been moon landings doesn't mean they were the Apollo moon landings we saw on TV and read about in the news.
I'm thinking anti-gravity craft.
Quite possibly. I think there may be a tremendous amount of fuckery about the moon.
Hell, at this point I am more likely to believe it is made of cheese than the "official narrative."
(Note, I've seen zero evidence it is made of cheese.)
Imagine if that comma was a typo.
Then we have "false moon landings are real"