What do these things have in common?
Bitcoin, Russia, Tether, Evergrande, MIT Digital Currency Initiative, Jeffrey Epstein, Pedophilia, Centralized Financial Control, Silver & Gold
Read on.
I was happy and encouraged today to read in a recent sermon by an awake American pastor:
In China the Communist Party sent tanks in front of banks to stop protests by people who were prevented from withdrawing their savings. It is not wise to trust “digital” money and investments, which can be frozen. Real assets are our own skills and relationships, as well as land, precious metals, and, yes, weapons to defend our freedoms.
I specifically appreciated the reference to not trusting 'digital' money.
In the past few weeks, I have been listening to the "Crypto Conspiracy Podcast", which is a 24 part series looking at bitcoin, the emergence of cryptocurrencies, their relationship to the precious metals market, and the circumstances around the rise of bitcoin.
The Crypto Conspiracy Podcast Episode 1
The pitfalls of digital currencies
The events in Canada at the beginning of the year show us clearly what the Cabal intends to do: being able to shut off and steal the assets of those who stand up against their tyranny, as the Canadian Truckers did. A meme I saw yesterday made an exceedingly pithy point: Having you social media account banned or shut down for X days because you failed to follow "the Community Standards" is simply a precursor of how their social credit system will work, except that it's not just your social media account, but your assets, bank accounts, access to utilities, ability to travel, etc.
All of this - the ability to shut down patriots and those who resist their tyranny at the flick of a switch - relies on their digitized slave system of complete digital surveillance, digital ID and digital assets and currency. Even now, central banks around the world are moving to introduce their own digital currencies, which they - the government - will control completely.
The inherent weakness of cryptocurrencies
Crypto currencies, and specifically the flagship Bitcoin, have the image of being anonymous and decentralized. But this is a misnomer and a false image. Bitcoin is completely centralized in the blockchain; every single action and transaction is recorded and is in fact traceable. This reality has been proven by the various arrests and legal actions taken against certain bitcoin holders.
Even now, there are moves by the government authorities and central banks to take bitcoin down, and replace it with their own digital currency. Russia, for example, has moved to impose regulations on use of crypto, and how it can be used. All that really remains at this point is for governments in the world to pass legislation that regulates, or bans, the use of crypto in exchange for local currency, for example. This sort of move is not hard for them to do.
Evergrande & Tether
Explored in the podcast: Is Tether, touted as an asset-backed stable coin, really based on Evergrande paper debt?
The Epstein connections
What is really mind-blowing about the bitcoin situation is the undeniable number of links between bitcoin, its emergence, and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, M.I.T., bitcoin developers like Joichi Ito and Wladimir Van Der Laan, and those who hold and control major elements of the bitcoin world - all connected.
Even just an hour or two of digging turns up the following. Why is this element NOT being talked about more?
MIT Digital Currency Initiative
MIT Media Lab became notorious after Ito continued to accept funding from Epstein. For years even after his crimes were known, Ito even covered up the actual source of financing.
Sauce: Adam Back Linked to Jeffrey Epstein? Vitalik Buterin Refutes Claims
"The case of Jeffrey Epstein is full of twists and turns, but to summarize it in one word – vile. As a serial sexual assaulter with cases registered against him since 2008, the MIT Digital Currency Initiative still accepted funding from him, which in itself questions the character of those on the board of directors."
Sauce: https://crypto.news/jeffery-epsteins-mit-digital-currency-initiative-industry-concerns/
New documents show that the M.I.T. Media Lab was aware of Epstein’s status as a convicted sex offender, and that Epstein directed contributions to the lab far exceeding the amounts M.I.T. has publicly admitted.
Sauce: New Yorker Magazine article
Joichi (Joi) Ito
In Japan, he was a founder of Digital Garage, and helped establish and later became CEO of the country’s first commercial Internet service provider. He was an early investor in more than 40 companies, including Flickr, Six Apart, Last.fm, Kongregate, Kickstarter, and Twitter. Ito’s honors include TIME magazine’s “Cyber-Elite” listing in 1997 (at age 31) and selection as one of the “Global Leaders for Tomorrow” by the World Economic Forum (2001).
Sauce: https://www.futureyoungleaders.org/featured-young-leaders/joichi-ito/
Ito & Digital Garage: https://jp.linkedin.com/in/joiito
Epstein, Pedophilia, MIT Media Lab, Joichi Ito: https://themillenniumreport.com/2019/08/jeffrey-epstein-mit-media-lab-and-the-bizarre-suiciding-of-aaron-swartz/
The series of podcasts is extensive, presented by 'Silver guru' David Morgan, but they reveal a much neglected investigation into how bitcoin started, who are the key players in the bitcoin world, and what the advent of bitcoin represents. Is it a coincidence that crypto came out and bitcoin emerged just as Obama rose to the presidency of the USA?
Comment: For many years now, I've had a hard time getting my head around crypto and bitcoin. There have been many conflicting views, like "cryptos will liberate everyone from the central banking system" to "crypto is the beast system that will be used to enslave humanity" etc.
The bigger picture
These podcasts paint a that indicates that, regardless of the value of the technology itself, crypto technology, and specifically bitcoin, etc., have been hijacked by the Cabal powerbrokers to their own advantage, firstly to drive populations away from the traditional storage of monetary value that precious metals (gold, silver, etc) have been, and secondly, to prepare the way for the introduction of centralized digital currencies that "can be frozen" at the drop of a hat.
I recommend this podcast series for all pedes, whether you have interest in gold and silver, or cryptos, or not. The picture these podcasts paint of the larger battlefield helps to put a LOT of what is happening around the world today in a perspective that is clearer than ever, and they point the way forward for those seeking to step outside of their tyranny. In particular, Podcast 14 brings a lot of the key content together. If you want to skip to the meaty part directly, have a listen to podcast 14.
The Crypto Conspiracy Podcast – Episode 14 - The Other Side of Crypto That Nobody Is Talking About
Either way, there is LOTS to dig on here.
__
Correct. Its always the ones who don't understand blockchains and how they work that cry foul. 100% if the time. Ignorance of the tech, and change rooted fear. There WILL BE digital assets known currently as cryptocurrencies. Its inevitable. Fight it all you want. Its coming. I remember when credit cards first came out. I heard this exact same rhetoric. Uninformed arguments against a financial utility that in the end, opened up retail flexibility, boosted monetary velocity, ect. Now almost everyone has a card in their wallet. Either credit or debit.
And you lived long enough to witness people being prevented from spending their money (by using a card), for various, arbitrary reasons, and yet you still doubt the truth after it has smacked you right in the face. How many times in your lifetime have you been stopped from making a purchase by card for..."reasons?"
Just because most people accept the risks of digital based transactions, it does not relegate those who are opposed to it (digital) as people who are "tech ignorant" or, embrace "uniformed rhetoric."
The truth of the matter is that everything digital can be stolen, just like all other material possessions. This includes elections, and Top Secret SAP military secrets, that even a dumb bitch like Hillary Clinton can steal, and hide in her basement computer server. I can promise you that your bitcoin isn't nearly as safe as you think it is.
And this is the argument always promoted in the face of those who raise objections and point out the problems.
"You don't understand it". Which is why you should really listen to podcast #14. This series addresses that objection many times over.
However, it should be pointed out that the podcast series does not, in itself, assert that cryptocurrencies or digital currencies are inherently bad. On many occasions, the speakers affirm that CC will be part of the future.
What they discuss is the fact that bitcoin is essentially pedo-coin, and that there is a MUCH bigger gambit at play here:
the crypto-psyop which has been to divert trillions of $$ away from the precious metals and into crypto in order to create a situation where the puppet masters can hoard the real assets - gold, silver and precious metals - to themselves.
You just proved his point... Crypto was not released for that. Bitcoin was released in response to the bank bailouts of the great recession of 2008.
It's in the white paper, read it. Bitcoin was released as a "Fuck You, signed: Everyone" to the bankers.
I don't understand why you anti-crypto people don't actually just read the actual literal documentation.
You guys never read the code, you never read the postings from the development community, you never go to the source when it comes to crypto.
Who said anyone is anti-crypto? Bit of a massive leap, there.
Moreover, you've made quite a lot of assertions here. "Crypto was not released for that. Bitcoin was released in response to the bank bailouts of the great recession of 2008"
How do you know? Do you know who wrote the white paper? Do you know who they are and are not connected to? Do you imagine that the white paper could NOT be written by a cabal operative(s) and still be written to look like X when the purpose is Y? That seems very naive to me.
Seems to me that a lot of people have a vested belief system in the crypto world, including bitcoin.
That aside, I cannot say I'm anti-crypto, or that in fact, the White paper and Crypto technology comes from the Cabal. The core assertion of the discussion in the podcasts is how there is evidence to support the theory that the tech has been hijacked and utilized by Cabal figures for a specific purpose, NOT that the technology itself is somehow bad of flawed.
Speaking of development, have you looked into the relationships between Epstein and bitcoin developer Wladimir Van Der Laan? Is this not relevant to a Q board?
What about Epstein and MIT Digital Currency Initiative?
Is none of this relevant because its miracle bitcoin, the solution to the central bank cartel?
Why was Epstein so involved? Why was he funding them? Why did they accept funding from Epstein?
Or should we just ignore this? Because, you know..... its bitcoin.
You mean, like the people that were receiving funding from Epstein?
Because the white paper matches the code and the system.
It's not like a bill where they call it "Inflation reduction act" and it's about something else.
You can read the white paper and then you can read the code a and see if what the code does matches the goals outlined in the paper.
Unlike government, computer programming is deterministic. If I read a code base and compile that code base myself, I know what it does, exactly.
It literally doesn't matter who's tied to what. It matters what the system does.
Even if a mass murdering pedophile satanist psychopath was the developer. If the code is open source, and the source matches the claims, the compiled program will operate as written.
There is no hiding back doors in open source. The level of autism involved in cryptocurrency is mind blowing.
Bitcoin isn't even the most secure project and it's so secure and stable that the network will continue to operate perfectly with 49% malicious actors. It will start to glitch at 50% malicious actors and will be completely broken around 70-80% malicious actors. That's amazing for a first attempt at a cryptocurrency.
There are projects now that are what they call "multi-algorithm" chains where the system will work flawlessly with up to 75% malicious actors. That's incredible.
The current fiat system, with all its security and monitoring and IT experts starts being corrupted at ~33% malicious actors and, even then, there are open security holes.
When you compare that to physical money, it's even crazier because people have been counterfeiting and coin cutting since the beginning of money.
This is why I like programming as a hobby. You should try it if you've never done it. The computer does exactly what it is told to do as you write it, even if you're wrong.
HERES ANOTHER WAY TO THINK OF IT:
Which file in the source code for Bitcoin is problematic and worries you?
my bank manager told me today that 50% of the banks have to be cashless by 2025. This falls right in line with the ISO20022 messaging standards being adopted. Backbone of that is XRP and XLM all the way.
Oh yeah, the elite invest in real estate I guess we shouldn't do that. The elite invest in the stock market I guess we shouldn't do that. The elite sell their stocks before the market crashes I guess we shouldn't follow them on that either. The elite try to influence culture for their benefit, I guess we shouldn't do that either. Hey bud the central bankers coins are what's coming and nothing can stop that. My bank manager just told me yesterday that 50% of their branches HAVE to be cashless by 2025. And scripturally speaking we know that the cabal will use this to eliminate who they they want from the financial system. SO you would seriously advice people not to invest in something because the Satanists use it? I guess I won't buy steak and calamari because evil Satanists enjoy those things. Well as the WEF says "you will own nothing and be happy" and that's specifically because you are NOT investing the way they do. Should we rather invest into something like Tornado cash that focuses on privacy...cause the feds just arrested the guy who made that lol. You ain't beating them in the financial sector boss.
Why not just use gold and silver? Before any of this bullshit started, the bankers had to do away with gold and silver backed money. It stands to reason that re-adopting those things would end this bullshit.
Oh, and you understand them? Have you audited the entire software? Are you capable of saying with any real confidence that the software, plus the OS, plus the hardware, plus the internet, all interacting together, are perfectly secure and backdoor free?
In fact, your superior "understanding" is nothing more than faith in the experts.
In God we Trust, not in manmade computers and software.
GLOWIE ALERT !!! GLOWIE ALERT !!! GLOWIE ALERT !!!
32 lengthy posts in less than an hour
Reported. Get out you vile piece of shit
Bro, you are the only one who thinks this.
Note: a comment is not a post.
OK … lemme restate … 32 COMMENTS. Lengthy COMMENTS. Not a chance in hell ONE person/human does that.
You are comparing credit cards and cryptocurrencies? With credit cards you have their money and can decide whether you want to repay it or not, with cryptos they have your money and can decide whether they want to pay it or not.
Literally: no. You need to read the source code for these projects.
You are actually promoting a literal, demonstrably wrong, lie.
That is not how it works. To fix your analogy:
With credit cards: you spend their money if they let you.
With crypto: You request to spend your credits on the network and then the miners do a bunch of work to make sure you're not a cheat, then they all cross-reference and double check each other and democratically vote on whether or not any one is a liar. Then if all these security processes are done, you spend your credits.
Lol, did you read it? And fully understand it all? And you're confident that, in interacting with the OS, the hardware, and the internet, that there are no holes or backdoors?
If you say "yes" you're a faggot liar.
It's not a complicated program....
Yeah, smart contacts added a virtual machine to the system and the virtual machine is complicated, but the actual crypto system isn't complicated.
Why do you think there's thousands of clones?
Making a working, basic crypto network is a hobby project.
It's easier than making an online video game.
Ethereum was made by a broke teenager as a hobby project in his spare time, by himself.
I'm sorry it's too hard for you/you don't know how to do it.
Enter decentralized wallets... catch up buddy.
I thought they were all decentralized from the start. Wasn't that the initial incentive to buy, separation from the establishment? Now we are creating new decentralized wallets differentiating them from the previous decentralized wallets?
There is a whole lot of history of people discussing this topic. Most people don't understand what decentralization means. Just because you have a wallet with some bitcoin doesn't mean you're contributing to decentralization. It originally referred to hashpower, which only miners contribute. Nowadays, most mining is done by pools, which are made of hundreds or thousands of individual miners running their own equipment. Miners are the only ones who matter as far as decentralization and everyone now admits bitcoin is very centralized in that regard, but like I said in another comment there are many other blockchain designs that improve on the original.
We've come to the conundrum eh?
If it's centralized, all your assets are in the control of whoever the central authority is.
If it's decentralized, it gets harder (or impossible) to verify transactions/assets.
I suppose we'll have to have some middle-ground, or mix and match appropriately for our needs.
Want to send money to your friend? Use a decentralized wallet. Want to buy off some online store? Use a centralized service.
Everything is compromise. I've been skeptical of crypto from day one. Despite that I still own crypto as I see it as a good investment asset, and a good medium of exchange.
If it all crashes down, I don't care. Hell, if my fiat crashes down, I don't care.
God's my authority, not money. Throw whatever you want at me.
Insert pic of two wojacks pointing in breathless amazement at "decentralized wallets"
Who wrote the software? Can they be trusted? Did you audit it yourself?
You have a point. Run it through that opensource nsa tool I guess
GLOWIE ALERT!!!!!!
Check out post history. 32 in an hour. FAKE AS FUK