We know that should that be it would never stick, but would allow a ton of evidence to be introduced, not only to the court, but to the American people.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
First arrest was Ghislaine Maxwell, which established the direction (child trafficking pedo's in the cross hairs).
I believe you are correct
There are only two consecutive and identical drops mentioning a « first arrest »:
https://qalerts.app/?q=First+arrest
u/#q3717
So it definitely won’t be President Donald Trump as it would confuse rather than verify action and confirm future direction.
Why couldn't first indictment be of PDT, creating a mass awakening, and first arrest being PDT verify and confirm direction... being the military?
If Trump were arrested there would be a very high chance of a Trump supporter (or many) being emotionally triggered into violence - which would only suit the DS at this point.
If there were riots, then good people would get hurt - and that is directly opposite of Q's stated intent to reduce innocent casualties as much as possible.
Once you invoke the mob, it's very hard to put it back into its bottle. Antifa is an exception, because they were basically renta-mob - so when the money dried up they stopped.
I agree. That's why I think we would see instant Marshall Law and the beginning of the truth... not to mention control of the media (and EBS) by white hats. The people were peaceful on January 6th...
I think, through Durham, Trump has many more sealed indictments ready to fire than whatever bad guy.
Agreed... those indictments are out there. I guess my point has more to do with how to interpret the way Q worded the post. Since there is no indictment of PDT, yet (that we know of), perhaps it is saying the "first indictment of PDT" . The "unseal" does not necessarily have to refer to all the unsealed indictments, but could refer to the unsealing of the first indictment of PDT.
Or, it could be the Pope : )
I didn't realize we knew the identity... I apologize.
So, who is it?
I keep seeing this, but not the relevant drop. Perhaps someone should psit it, and mods sticky it so everyone gets the message.
First it was “he had to be impeached to expose the Deep State.” Then it was “he had to lose 2020 to expose the DS.” Now people are seriously suggesting that Trump needs to be arrested to further “the Plan” and cause the military to finally act?
That is literally the worst plan ever devised. There are only two outcomes for that plan - anons kick the can by suggest it had to be this way to introduce a new “savior” ( Desantis?), or nationwide violence. The latter will result in the military finally acting - against the American people.
Agreed. You can only rope-a-dope so much before you eventually are the dope.
This question keeps being raised on this Board, and there is a lot of discussion about it if one searches the Board.
I have a theory... because the question keeps surfacing... what if Q-Team members are posting this question randomly to get Anons to be more comfortable with the notion, so that when it happens we are still out in front of it...?
Personally, I have always thought that PT would be the first arrest, because it would force the military to finally act.
Interesting theory. Hadn’t heard it put so well.
Hm.
He has to be the first arrest. He is baiting the deep state. No president has had their home raided, or arrested. The precedent must be set.
Exactly why they might not want to arrest him. They know he can release too much damming info. Although they know he will eventually anyway. I also agree it would set a precedent but maybe one doesn’t need to be set. Maybe a resting Obama could set the precedent.
No
"They" (with the support of the media) are pushing this bullshit idea like crazy right now. I think it is more fear porn and we shouldn't buy into it.
Really? Do someone believe it's possible to arrest the commander in chief of the US? Really?