I've seen many anons here on GA asking how to to stop paying income tax (in the USA). There are many approaches. I'll briefly share a few ideas, however the linked video is by a guy using a method that I'm hearing through the grapevine that many are finding success with. I highly encourage everybody here to give it a listen and decide if you feel up to the task.
The video is 1hour, 20 minutes from SGT Report last night. And the tl;dr is this: Constitutional law trumps tax law. And nowhere in the Constitution does it say that a man/woman's labor/capital are taxable. The word "income" was meant to apply to capital gains. You'd never hear such a thing from a brainwashed "agent of the state", but nonetheless, this is the case. Listen and learn:
https://odysee.com/@sgtreport:7/brian:3
And this is effectively who (the uber-wealthy) and what (capital gains) was supposed to be taxed with the pseudo-passage of the 16th amendment. It was sold to the states as a "wealth tax", not a "wage tax". Also, many today say that the 16th amendment never had two-thirds of the states ratify it. It's a bone of contention to this day. Supporters can't prove enough states ratified it, and opposers can't prove that they didn't. Par for the course. It should be a simple process but I digest (shout out to Brent Terhune!)... :)
Notwithstanding this, less than 5% of Americans were paying "income taxes" prior to WWII when the passage of the "Victory Tax" was implemented to assist with the war effort in 1942. Everybody above the poverty line paid a flat 10% of their wages to support the war. And after the war ended, Congress didn't end the "Victory Tax" statute (not a LAW) and people just kept right on paying it without questioning it. Then in 1953 "Income tax" became formalized in the Code of Federal Regulations and here we are. Perfectly boiled frogs - 40 years, the "2 generation" shift to ignorance magic trick masterfully executed yet again.
As to approaches people are taking, there are many. The majority require that you do a decent amount of research so you know what you're doing. One thing is for certain, as the man in the video points out, the IRS isn't going to make it easy for you and they'll use any number of methods to deceive you in order to suck you back into their fold. As such, research and studying are an absolute necessity IMHO.
Approach #1 - (from the video) - "Wages/Capital" are not "income", as strictly defined by the Constitution and all the LEGALESE statute deception designed to confuse you. For those who have their paychecks garnished, it is highly recommended that you raise the number of dependents so as to not have to fight for a refund. And it's none of your employer/HR-manager's business if they ask. They aren't getting paid one red cent to act as agents for the tax collectors.
Approach #2 - You're not a "taxpayer" - you're a man or a woman. Nor are you a "Resident" - you're a man or a woman. Nor are you a "Citizen" - you're a man or a woman. See the trick? It is YOU that are making a CLAIM of being a 'taxpayer" (which is a fictional LEGAL entity), not them. And you VOLUNTARILY make the claim. Nobody forced you into doing it. So a number of people are simply denying that they are what's known as a "Taxpayer" and asking the IRS to PROVE THEIR CLAIM that you are. All of this done IN WRITING I might add. Not in a conversation. You must communicate IN WRITING at all times. Never agree to a conversation. Results I've heard for using this method is that after several back and forth mailings, the IRS stops bothering these people. There are no more attempts to collect. The same guy in this video covers this topic on his website.
Approach #3 - You don't "RESIDE" in the "DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA". This is yet another deception that I'm not going to explain in any detail here. But suffice it to say, the group running the "FEDERAL (not American) GOVERNMENT" has deceptively turned the land of the 50 independent states into being part of their FEDERAL DISTRICT (of Columbia) through the cunning use of State abbreviations (AL, CA, NY, etc.) and zip codes. Once again, these are LEGAL (fictional) CORPORATE entities and "regions". They aren't REAL!!! California is a geographical description. The "STATE OF CALIFORNIA" is a corporation doing international business. And "CA" is a fictional designation given to a "Virtual District" that exists within the "FEDERAL JURISDICTION" exclusively on paper. Peymon Mottahedeh is the guy who runs this site called "Freedom Law School" -> https://livefreenow.org/ --- and uses this method. I can't vouch for the guy and I don't know anybody who has used his services. He did do a few interviews on the Stew Peters show and advertised there for a couple months. Is he legit? I don't know. Based on a cursory review of his website, it appears he's charging a tidy sum of money for his services. However, he does offer a $1,000,000 guarantee that if his method doesn't work, he'll pay up to that amount in back taxes and penalties. And he openly says he hasn't paid taxes in nearly 30 years. Caveat emptor.
Approach #4 - Another guy named Karl Lentz has been telling his listeners for years that it's all even simpler than this. This is a guy who remarkably figured out the whole "Legal vs Lawful" sham on his own after his kids were taken away from him by CPS several decades ago. He uses what I call the "King/Sovereign" approach, which is fundamentally correct but not advisable if you don't realize who YOU are (and are NOT) and who THEY are - which requires dedicated research and comprehension. But in a nutshell, he says that no MAN or WOMAN at the IRS will ever PUT IN WRITING and add their SIGNATURE to a piece of paper CLAIMING you owe them money. He says he's dealt with the IRS many times and each time he has asked this simple question: "If there is a MAN or WOMAN at the IRS that CLAIMS I owe them money, please have them put in writing with their full name, title and signature at the bottom of an official IRS document and I will then honor my duty and obligation to that MAN or WOMAN if in fact I do owe them money." He never hears back other than agents begging him to "come on in for a discussion", which he always refuses.
At a minimum, hopefully all who read this will at least come to a basic understanding that we have been deceived into WILLFULLY and VOLUNTARILY ACCEPTING these "Titles of Slavery" (as opposed to "Titles of Nobility"), as I call them -> Person, Citizen, Resident, Taxpayer, Tenant, Driver, and on and on and on. The list is endless. And nobody FORCED you to accept these titles. Granted, nobody explained any of this to you either. Such is the game we're playing. It is and always has been an information/education war.
And one major caveat. It should go without saying that there is no preventing brute thug force, and I realize this causes many to shy away from any attempts to do any of this. My best advice is to educate yourselves, more and more on these "legal vs lawful" topics, not just around taxes. Because it's ultimately an individual effort. I don't expect a white knight to ride in and fix everything for everybody all at once. It's just not going to happen this way as there are still many millions who unwittingly prefer to "be governed" rather than to become self-governing themselves.
This all goes well beyond taxes, although this is the topic that gets the most interest from most. Income, property, state/local, etc. The legal system is a "containment field" of sorts, so vast and all-encompassing as to be unseeable, that "matrix that is all around you blinding you from the truth Neo". And of course it has usurped our "lawful system" in the process.
At the end of the day, I encourage those who feel inspired to begin learning and researching these topics, as opposed to just diving right in and not paying your taxes, hoping it will all just work out for you. The guy in the video, Brian Swanson, runs this website: https://capitalvsincome.com and it's as good a place as any to start. You're going to need to understand all the tricks and deceptions that will be employed against you, and a sound understanding as well as knowing people out there that are doing the same thing as a strong support network. Suffice it to say the cabal won't just roll over, as Brian points out in the interview.
We're still in the early days of people catching on to this legal scam. The "Great Awakening" is under way and more and more are beginning to wonder why they are voluntarily funding a clearly insane and unelected bureaucracy.
I wish you all luck and happy to answer any relevant questions.
thanks. Has anyone ever brought a lawsuit against the IRS, and demanded repayment of what was collected fraudulently and deceitfully?
I wonder if a class action suit should be undertaken.
The guy in the video has brought two lawsuits and is embarking on a third. He won the first two.
Class action won't work because people are VOLUNTARILY paying their taxes by their own free will. That's the whole point of this post. You have to learn to stop voluntarily giving your money away.
Thanks. Good point. But, being deceived means that my actions are not truly voluntary--if I knew the truth, I would choose differently. In the wild west, a snake oil salesman could be hung, but he bailed out of town before anyone caught on.
They would argue that the truth is available and in plain sight but you just chose to ignore it. As angering as that may be to you, this is their stance.
Basically, it's your fault for allowing your enemy to educate and entertain you your whole life.
And who would you sue anyway? 99% of the people who work for these government bureaucracies are as ignorant as the rest of the population. The people who hatched this plan 125 years ago are long since gone. And there are but a tiny few today that are fully aware of the scam. Tax court judges are obviously in on it.
The responsibility lies with each one of us to unbind ourselves, just as we voluntarily chose to bind ourselves. What was individually done can be individually undone. There is no other way...
I appreciate the insights. Thanks. I need to look into this.
I did not have an issue with the IRS, but I did have one with the CA state taxation agency. I caught them running an embezzlement and racketeering scheme, and the case was about whether or not it was legal for them to embezzle my estimated tax payment then charge me penalties for "paying late." In my own case, I cited a legal ruling that I had read about in the news; however, that case had been scrubbed from the website that has all the legal cases past and present listed.
In my court case, the taxation agency refused to acknowledge the grounds of my case. They kept pretending the case was about something else. They committed multiple counts of perjury and improperly redacted documents to hide their accounting fraud to hide where the money disappeared. They also retaliated against me by posting me and my husband's social security numbers on the internet.
In his rulings he judge never addressed the grounds of my case. The judge then threatened me, telling me that "my nice family" would be harmed if I didn't stop making allegations of government corruption. David Myrland's life was ruined by the IRS for fighting them. At the end of the video series, he recommends to not try to fight them because they know they have no legal basis and thus fight dirty to keep their agency intact.
I know that what I wrote sounds bleak and defeatist, but actually, I am very hopeful that more and more people will wake up and refuse to comply with unlawful theft of our hard earned money. They can't go after all of us and once enough people refuse to comply, the taxation agencies are DONE. Hence the ramping up of agents; the more agents they have, the longer until they are done, but even with more agents, their days are numbered.
Thanks for the share. And yes, there are thousands of stories of people going into battle in the TAX COURTS, which is a whole separate court system from our common law, state, local and federal jurisdictions. It's a PRIVATE jurisdiction in every way imaginable, designed to hide the truth and for you to lose in most cases. Now of course, they have to let some people win some of the time lest the truth get revealed. So there are always a few who win from time to time.
But as you say, they just move the goalposts, shift the burden, change the argument, just as Brian in the linked video explains. The bottom line is, it's all rigged against you. Which is why you should not engage with them on their turf (tax courts). And also why you should not TALK with them. You need to do everything in writing.
The larger problem arises when they already have your money and you're trying to get it back. This is an increasingly difficult situation to be in. Which is why I suggest not allowing your earnings to be "withheld" by your employer to begin with.
The essence of the approaches I shared is that these AGENCIES have no business with YOU, and no business addressing YOU. A living/breathing MAN/WOMAN does not fall under their purview or jurisdiction, nor somebody who doesn't live within a "federal district". The IRS is a fictional corporation that only has jurisdiction and power over other fictional corporations, like your ALL CAPS NAME, as well as fictional legal entities, in this case "taxpayers".
Once you see it you see it. Until then this stuff is all just frustrating and aggravating gobbley-gook and rhetoric. I totally get it.
There was a recent ruling in the 5th circuit court that congress did not have the authority to shift legislative powers to the SEC. That may wind up having serious impact on other sectors of specialized governance agencies, including the IRS. We shall see.... https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-61007-CV0.pdf
We can surely hope! But I'm not interested in waiting around for the very bureaucrats that profit from our ignorance making changes any time soon. If we each individually bound ourselves, we can likewise unbind ourselves.
I totally agree! But this ruling may make it easier to unbind ourselves.
Let's hope so! We could use all the help we can get!!
Document explaining that the IRS was created by executive order, nto by a law passed. https://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/CREATEirs.html
Here is a series of short videos explaining why the income tax is illegal and how the IRS gets away with the fraudulent taxes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAkSTXk9sO0FE0cpDo3vWp_MvYV_tYkJO
The Income Tax is not lawful, however it is Legal
Did you voluntarily endorse private credit
Does endorsing private credit constitute entering into a contract with the issuer??
=============
Statutes creating corporations are private acts: 20 Am.Jur. 35, p. 60. In this connection, the Federal Reserve Act is private law.
.
Federal Reserve banks derive their existence and corporate power from the Federal Reserve Act: Armano v. Federal Reserve Bank, 468 F.Supp. 674 (1979).
. .
A private act may be published as a public law when the general public is afforded the opportunity of participating in the operation of the private law. The Internal Revenue Code is an example of private law which does not exclude the voluntary participation of the general public. Had the Internal Revenue Code been written as substantive public law, the code would be repugnant to the Constitution, since no one could be compelled to file a return and thereby become a witness against himself. Under the fifty titles listed on the preface page of the United States Code, the Internal Revenue Code (26 USC) is listed as having not been enacted as substantive public law, conceding that the Internal Revenue Code is private law
...................
HJR-192 automatically extended the privilege to renege on debts to every person using the Federal Reserve banking system; however, never forget that when you operate on a privilege, you have to respect the ruler of the giver of that privilege. Furthermore, in the case of .
Great Falls Mfg. Co. v. Attorney General, 124 U.S. 581, the court said:
"The court will not pass upon the constitutionality of a statute at the instance of one who has availed himself of its benefits."
.
Thus, if you avail yourself of any benefits of the public credit system you waive the right to challenge the validity of any statute pertaining to, and conferring "benefits" of this system on the basis of constitutionality. cmlaw8.htm
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6020
The IRS (specifically the secretary him/herself) is required to do your taxes for you.
Failure to file only applies if you lie / deceive / attempt to hide. They have deadlines in which they must do your return for you, notify you of refund owed, and send you a check.
26 USC 6020: Returns prepared for or executed by Secretary Text contains those laws in effect on August 28, 2022 From Title 26-INTERNAL REVENUE CODE Subtitle F-Procedure and Administration CHAPTER 61-INFORMATION AND RETURNS Subchapter A-Returns and Records PART II-TAX RETURNS OR STATEMENTS Subpart D-Miscellaneous Provisions
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2008/02/20/E8-3100/substitute-for-return
https://casetext.com/statute/united-states-code/title-26-internal-revenue-code/subtitle-f-procedure-and-administration/chapter-61-information-and-returns/subchapter-a-returns-and-records/part-ii-tax-returns-or-statements/subpart-d-miscellaneous-provisions/section-6020-returns-prepared-for-or-executed-by-secretary
interesting notes: rule was amended, 'or his delagates' was removed. the LAW says the secretary themselves must do it, not a delegate, not an officer, not an agent, not a machine.
the return must be signed by a person under oath and penalty of perjury. Reading through their regs, they don't actually do that.
There is a difference between "You" and the "you" buried in all the "tax codes". The latter being a voluntarily admitted to "taxpayer". There are fundamental PRESUMPTIONS inherent in every statute, code, act, regulation, ordinance, mandate, etc. If you are unwilling or unable to rebut their presumptions, than they've got you right where they want you - as a slave to their system.
This is why I point out that if you don't fully comprehend what's going on, you should not embark on this path. The trickery and deception is built-in to our everyday society. If you can't you see it, or choose not to, then you'll get caught up in one scheme or another that you can't get out of, always by your own ignorant, uniformed, voluntary self-admission. They're counting on this!
From my (our) POV, the "tax codes" simply do not apply to a living man or woman so there's no reason to even attempt to understand them. "Codes" are for dead, fictional entities, like; **Persons, residents, citizens, drivers, tenants, homeowners, taxpayers" etc. If you agree that you are one of these fictional LEGAL entities, and/or a thousand others, than none of these strategies will work for you. That's the essence of all that I shared.
Here are a couple of Donald Duck propaganda videos from the 40s put out to convince Americans to pay the newly imposed income taxes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNMrMFuk-bo and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMU-KGKK6q8
Would it be wise to wait till the end of the year to update my w2 or can it be done at any time in the year.
You can do it at anytime, like if you just had a child today for example. The sooner the better, that way you've given over less money that you might have to fight for a refund check over. And it can't hurt anything. If you decide you're going to just go along and pay your taxes, you'll just give them the same amount of money later as opposed to earlier anyway.
Makes sense. I’m gonna go for it. I really don’t have much to lose. I’m just not entirely sure how crypto/stocks will work. I assume I would pay taxes on those and keep my paycheck to myself by updating my w2 and keep insisting on the difference between the 2. Need to do a bit more digging.
I’m fully prepared to lose this game of chicken. Let’s see how well I’ve built an immunity to fear and intimidation.
Great! Yeah, the capital gains aspect of things doesn't fit into the wages/earnings part of "income" tax. I'm pretty sure you're still on the hook for those, although technically you shouldn't be. But I don't know enough to help you one way or the other on this so definitely do your own due diligence on cap gains.
Hey how’s it going.
I wanted to ask if you had any tips (not advice) on updating w4. It seems like the only way I can get 0 withholding is if I lie. Because of penalty of perjury, it’s not a smart option.
Search results didn’t yield anything useful (as expected).
That's the only way to go if you want to keep your money until the last possible day (assuming you're going to pay taxes).
The question is, exactly WHO/WHAT is "perjuring" itself. The man named "John Q Doe" whose earnings/wages cannot be taxed as per the Constitution, or the TRUSTEE for the "JOHN Q DOE" trust under the LEGAL SYSTEM which can tax "Income" earned (capital gains) by the fictional entity JOHN Q DOE (strawman) trust.
This is the whole shooting match. If you don't understand these things, at a bare minimum, than you probably shouldn't take the risk.
Well that’s the thing. I trying to learn more before I execute. I figured you’d say what you said but at the same time I was hoping there was another way.
I remember reading about the legal entity thing and how birth certificate are some sort of bond. Never really looked into it but I will now. Thanks for the info.
I wish I could give you a better answer. Even when you know this stuff through and through, that doesn't prevent the IRS from coming after you. You have to be psychologically prepared for this eventuality before you go down this path. And hiring an attorney ensures you will lose no matter what. So you have to be prepared to withstand their aggression, by holding your sovereign ground as a man, not as the legal entity (strawman trust -> ALL CAPS NAME) you've been the ACTING TRUSTEE for in previous years.
And they will play stupid on any and all of your efforts to do so. Tax court is a jurisdiction of the dead/fictional entity. As such, the man/woman ACTING as the judge, the man/woman ACTING as the prosecutor, and all other men/women in the tax courtroom ACTING in their fictional capacity (bailiff, court reporter, assistant attorneys, etc.) CANNOT HEAR....let me repeat that.... CANNOT HEAR the words of a man/woman. These ACTORS can only HEAR/UNDERSTAND the ACTIONS of a DEFENDANT/LITIGANT/AFFIANT/TAXPAYER/ETC.
Do you get the gist of what I'm saying? Because you must if you're going to try this. Otherwise, you're certain to lose.
There are no men/women in the LEGAL SYSTEM. There are only those ACTING AS judges, attorneys, plaintiffs, defendants, citizens, persons, residents, taxpayers, etc. Because it's all an ACT, a FICTIONAL DRAMA, a GAME, that unfortunately, we weren't informed about.
And this is why you must get the IRS to put things in writing, asking for signatures by real men/women claiming a debt is due to them and demonstrating how you, the man, are a "taxpayer". As soon as you agree to ACT as a taxpayer, or a defendant, or a resident, etc., then they have you dead to rights --> ACTING as the FICTIONAL ENTITY that they can then prosecute and levee fines against.
They'll never agree that you're only a man/woman, accepting no other titles. They'll pretend they have no idea what you're talking about. They'll point out that you ACTED AS the "taxpayer" in years prior as evidence that you must think you're one. If you agree you once were, but then say you aren't now, they'll then play the game of "Well were you telling the truth then and lying now, or vice versa". And no matter how you verbally answer, you're screwed. You simply can't talk with them, requesting everything in writing accompanied by the signature of a man/woman. This, they cannot do.
Do you see why? The dead (fictional entities) cannot summons the living (men/women). Each are in entirely separate domains/jurisdictions. And neither can see/hear the other. This is the trick. They send LEGAL DEMANDS (taxes due) to fictional entities. And you must respond as the living man/woman requesting correspondence only from men/women. A letter from the IRS with a fictional titled entity, like "Director of IRS Collections (or whatever)", is another fictional entity. A man/woman can't hear/understand this fictional entity. But a person/resident/taxpayer can interact with this fictional entity.
Confusing? Frustrating? Maddening? All three? Such is the way. And you must ALWAYS, and I do mean ALWAYS, behave and ACT HONORABLY when dealing with them. Because there is nothing more important in the LEGAL SYSTEM than acting honorably. Nothing. Honorable behavior trumps truth and facts a million times over. This is their game. This is their system. And as such, you have to play by their rules.
The great thing is, their rules allow for the man/woman, who KNOWS WHO HE/SHE IS, to prevail. And by extension, you must know who you ARE NOT (taxpayer, person, defendant, citizen, resident). And because it's a game, they will attempt to trick you a thousand different ways in order to ensure that you really are a man/woman who knows who they are.
If this sounds overwhelming to you, I understand. This is why you must educate yourself. I recommend listening to hundreds of hours of Karl Lentz until you pick up on just what he's saying. It takes time. It takes listening to hundreds of different interactions with people in different situations before it "clicks". But when it does, they you're prepared.
I wouldn't try this had I not invested the time to learn. Karl Lentz is the best place to start IMHO. You can listen to him here -> https://www.youtube.com/c/CraigLynch/videos
I can point you to many dozen other folks worth listening to as well. But many are one trick pony's in man ways. They only deal with taxes, or CPS, or driving infractions, or family court, etc. Lentz's methods work in any and all situations. You don't need to learn this trick and that trick, and you don't need to learn the legal system. You need to EMBODY the role of the man/woman, the king/queen, the sovereign. After which, you will come to realize that the IRS works for YOU. The judge works for YOU. And when YOU hold court, you are the BOSS. And your court (common law) is superior to their court (statutory, admiralty, tax court jurisdiction, etc.). CLAIMS (facts) trump COMPLAINTS (whining/complaining). It's right there in the words if you can see it. Men and women file the former, fictional entities file the latter.
Your education is far more valuable than saving a couple grand this tax season. I wish you luck!
I really appreciate you taking the time to write all that out. I’m starting to get the gist of it and it’s exactly what I was expecting. I’d have to be commuted to standing my ground, and I know I’d have to take on a different mindset when doing so.
I’ll check out the YouTube link you sent. If you have any other names worth mentioning, please do. I’ll definitely add them to my to-read list.
It’s not about the money for me, it’s about funding evil.
Yep, you've got the right motivation.
Here are couple more options. This Bryan Swanson guy seems to be highly active right now in not paying taxes: https://capitalvsincome.com/
Here's a recent interview Bryan did: https://odysee.com/@sgtreport:7/brian:3
Bryan is effectively following these people's research and guidance, but he's added a bit of his own material to it: https://www.losthorizons.com/
And this guy will do all the work for you, for a pretty penny I might add, but it would save you having to educate yourself. He offers a $1million guarantee to pay any back taxes if you use his services. I think his basic offering starts around $10 grand or so. https://livefreenow.org/
I still prefer understanding I'm the king and I have no "income" following Lentz's methods. I think Karl is correct in saying that once the authorities/courts realize you know what you're doing and who you are, they leave you alone forevermore as they don't want the masses to catch on. So it's easier to let a few who have educated themselves "slip through the cracks" rather than trying to make a public example out of them.
Remember, no matter what you choose to do, don't ever hire an attorney. Not only will it cost you an arm and a leg, but you'll ultimately lose choosing any of the above methods.
Anyway, good luck!
Our greatest strength is in numbers. Find the other lions. Find those pissed off that the presidency has been stolen, the country has been stolen.
There's got to be millions that can't stand paying our illegitimate farce of a government. Get just a few hundred willing to take a stand and watch it cascade. This whole system could be changed by to a Constitutional Republic.
Methinks there will be tens, possibly hundreds of thousands, possibly millions who will do this in the next year or two. It's gonna take some kajones, but as always, there is strength in numbers!
Especially if the vaxx takes hold with a cascade of deaths as many fear. People are simply going to refuse to pay a government that brought this outcome about.
What Is Income?
Since the term “income” is not defined in the RTC or in the IRC, we are justified by the holding in Holmes v. McColgan supra to search for federal judicial pronouncements on this point. Fortunately for us, the federal courts have been unusually clear on the correct legal definition of “income”. Appendix “J” in “The Federal Zone” contains a short list of those definitions, which are repeated here as follows:
Income is NOT everything that “comes in”:
[Southern Pacific Co. v. John Z. Lowe, 247 U.S. 330]
............
Corporate profits are "income":
[Emanuel J. Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co., 247 U.S. 179]
..............
Congress CANNOT change the Constitution:
[Mark Eisner v. Myrtle H. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189]
...........
Again, "income" is a gain, a profit:
[Mark Eisner v. Myrtle H. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189]
..............
The Supreme Court has REPEATEDLY ruled that compensation for professional services is not "income":
[Merchant's Loan & Trust v. Smietanka, 255 U.S. 509]
..................
"Income" has been legally and officially defined:
[Goodrich v. Edwards, 255 U.S. 527]
................
You do NOT obtain "income" by charging for services rendered:
[Edwards v. Keith, 231 F. 111 (2nd Cir.)]
...........
No gain, no income -- no income, no tax:
[Conner v. U.S., 303 F.Supp. 1187]
..............
"Income" means "gain" -- "gain" means "profit":
[Staples v. U.S., E.D. Penna., 21 F.Supp. 737]
................
Wages and profits are two DIFFERENT things:
[Oliver v. Halstead, 196 Va. 992; 86 S.E. 2d 858]
............
Payment for labor is NOT profit:
[Laureldale Cemetery Assoc. v. Matthews] [345 Pa. 239; 47 A. 2d 277, 280]
............
The meaning of "income" has been CONSISTENT in law:
............
Again, "income" has had the SAME MEANING in law:
[Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U.S. 103]
...................
"Income" is NOT the same as "gross receipts":
[Anderson Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Hofferbert, USDC Maryland] [102 F.Supp. 902]
............
Try to find a principle that is better settled:
[Alan Stang, Tax Scam, Mt. Sinai Press, POB 1220] [Alta Loma 91701, CALIF. 1988]
Great citations TRYNEIN. The evidence abounds, but so few are willing to take the chance just yet. I think it's safe to say we're still a little early on garnering any interest on this topic. But alas, we'll still keep sharing the evident truth and hope to win over a few converts at a time!
I agree
I Have more if you ever need it, just ask
=============
"Income has been taken to mean the same thing as used in the Corporation Excise Tax of 1909 (36 Stat. 112). The worker does not receive a profit or gain from his/her labors-merely an equal exchange of funds for services"
"The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for the mere privilege of existing. The corporation is an artificial entity which owes its existence and charter powers to the state; but the individuals' rights to live and own property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which an excise cannot be imposed."
Redfield v. Fisher, 292 P. 813, 135 Or. 180, 294 P.461, 73 A.L.R. 721 (1931)
=========
“In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, unless the context indicates otherwise— the words ‘person’ and ‘whoever’ include corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals.”
U.S. Code › Title 1 › Chapter 1 › § 1
It's all good stuff and might indeed come in handy some day. I'll definitely save it. However, I myself prefer the Karl Lentz/Bill Thornton "King" approach when it comes to these matters. I haven't suffered through hundreds of hours of Karl;s "Talk Shoe" audios for nuthin! :)
Thanks again for adding your wisdom to this thread!
These court decisions are proof of the lies for those who are just waking up.
I absolutely would not suggest anyone try to take on the IRS until they understand real law and the real money vs the colourable law they use because of colourable money
Very good points indeed. It was a good share. You're a valuable resource and I'm glad you're here.
But you're right, at this stage, just getting the normies to stop and consider things is the challenge at the moment...
Great post fren
What charge was Al Capone arrested for???!!
Why???
If they wanna get you and make an example out of you, it's gonna happen and there ain't nothing you could do about it. They're banking on their compliant citizen's fear more than anything else.